English Teachers’ Understanding and Implementation of Large-Unit Integrated Teaching in Chinese Middle Schools

Authors

  • Jiayi Pang Master Student in Division of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Jutarat Vibulphol Assistant Professor (Ph.D.) in Division of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

large-unit integrated teaching, English language teaching in China, teacher understanding, policy implementation

Abstract

The recent basic education curriculum revision in China has promoted the use of a large-unit integrated teaching approach in designing instruction. Using this approach, teachers design a unit that integrates several subjects related to real-life situations. This qualitative study aims to explore middle school English teachers' understanding and implementation of large-unit integrated teaching, focusing on objective setting, content design, learning activities, classroom roles, material selection, and assessment practices. Six English teachers were purposively selected for interviews and lesson plan analysis. Data were analyzed through deductive qualitative content analysis. The results of the research revealed that six teachers were aware of the value of the large-unit integrated teaching approach. The teaching units designed by experienced teachers had clear learning objectives, coherent teaching activities, and systematic assessment strategies. In contrast, novice teachers had trouble transforming broad course objectives into specific teaching plans. They often use the degree of participation in activities as the assessment goal rather than actual learning outcomes, and the assessment method is examination-oriented. The research shows that the successful implementation of large-unit integrated teaching depends not only on teachers' acceptance of the reform but also on their ability to translate curriculum principles into coherent instructional practices. The findings highlight the role of teacher cognition, assessment literacy, and curriculum interpretation in supporting coherent implementation of large-unit integrated teaching. And provides implications for teacher professional development. Clearer curriculum guidance and assessment standards may further support effective large-unit integrated teaching implementation.

References

English

Bertram, C. (2023). A systems approach to understanding novice teachers’ experiences and professional learning. Journal of Education, 90, 11–31. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i90a01

Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 190-209). Cambridge University Press.

Deng, L., Wu, Y., Chen, L., & Peng, Z. (2024). ‘Pursuing competencies’ or ‘pursuing scores’? High school teachers’ perceptions and practices of competency-based education reform in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141, Article 104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104510

Fiegener, A. M., & Adams, C. M. (2024). Instructional Program Coherence: A structural support for teacher psychological needs. Journal of School Leadership, 35(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846241271459

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Lyu, S. (2025). Unit-based integrated teaching under the perspective of the new English curriculum standards. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 9(1), Article 10590. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10590

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). 义务教育英语课程标准 (2022年版) [English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 Edition)]. People's Education Press. https://www.britishcouncil.cn/sites/default/files/annex_4_-_cnec_translated_version_final.pdf

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004

Tajeddin, Z., & Mansouri, A. (2024). Teachers’ cognition and classroom implementation of tasks in task-supported language teaching (TSLT). Language Teaching Research, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241230945

Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching. In A. B. M. Tsui (Ed.), Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers (pp. 245–282). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524698.011

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, (pp. 1-12). Libraries Unlimited. https://pages.ischool.utexas.edu/yanz/Content_analysis.pdf

Chinese

Cao, X. (2025). 初中英语单元整体教学实践中的问题及对策 [Problems and countermeasures in the practice of junior high school English unit-integrated teaching]. Educational Theory and Research, 3(4), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.61369/etr.10859

Lao, X. (2024). 初中英语单元整体教学设计—以人教版初中英语教材为例 [Unit-based integrated teaching design in junior high school English—A case study of junior English textbook published by PEP]. Research on Innovative Education, 12(2), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2024.122060

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Pang, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2026). English Teachers’ Understanding and Implementation of Large-Unit Integrated Teaching in Chinese Middle Schools. An Online Journal of Education, 21(2), 1–16. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/OJED/article/view/286871

Issue

Section

Research Articles