Thai Millennials’Online Political Engagement: Investigating Motivation Behinds Their Engagement on Facebook

Main Article Content

Poiluang Konsongsaen
Ratanasuda Punnahitanond
Rosechongporn Komolsevin
Pacharaporn Kesaprakorn

Abstract

Facebook mobilizes society by facilitating users to engage in political issues quite freely. Motivations behind this political communication phenomenon remain to be explored in greater detail. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 225 samples of Thai Millennials in Bangkok to examine how Selective Exposure (SE), Willingness to Self-Censor (WSC) and political news interest, influence their political engagement (Like, Comment, and Share) on Facebook. Results of Multiple Regression Analysis showed that the samples’SE, WSC and political news interest significantly influenced their engagement with news article related to politics in general, and engagement with remunerative, and relational contents based on the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT). Informational contents were significantly influenced by WSC and political news interest, whereas entertaining contents were significantly influenced by SE and political news interest.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Abdulrauf, A. A., Hamid, N. A., & Ishak, M. S. (2015). Social media and youth online political participation: Perspectives on cognitive engagement. New Media and Mass Communication, 44, 8-15.

Batorski, D., & Grzywinska, I. (2018). Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 356-374.

Bennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In J. S. Wurzel (Ed.), Toward Multiculturalism: A Reader in Multicultural Education (pp. 62–77). Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation.

Brundidge, J. & Rice, R. E. (2009). Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded become more similar? In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), The Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 144-156). London and New York: Routledge

Bobok, D. (2016). Selective exposure, filter bubbles and echo chambers on Facebook (Master’s

thesis, Central European University).

Chan, M. (2018). Reluctance to talk about politics in face-to-face and Facebook settings: Examining

the impact of fear of isolation, willingness to self-censor, and peer network

characteristics. Mass Communication and Society, 21(1), 1-23.

Chatchorfa, A. (2020). Thais Politics and political involvement. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 7(7),

-11.

Chen, H. T., Chan, M., & Lee, F. L. (2016). Social media use and democratic engagement: A

comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. Chinese Journal of

Communication, 9(4), 348-366.

Dahlgren, P. (2007). Civic identity and net activism: The frame of radical democracy. In Radical

democracy and the Internet (pp. 55-72). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses

and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277.

Gottfried, J., & Barthel, M. (2015). How millennials’ political news habits differ from those of Gen Xers and Baby Boomers. Retrieved June 1, 2020, from http://www. journalism. org/2015/01/28/after-charliehebdo-balancing-press-freedom-and-respect-for-religion.

Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Gencer, A. S., & BouJaoude S. B. (2014). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581–603.

Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 443-455.

Hampton, K. N., Rainie, H., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the 'spiral of silence'. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Lu, W. (2016). Social media and political discussion: When online presence silences offline conversation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 1091-1107.

Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19-34.

Katz, M., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as ‘escape’: Clarification of a concept. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 377–388.

Kaye, B., & Johnson, T. (2014). Site effects: How reliance on social media influences confidence in the government and news media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2), 127-144.

Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: Global digital overview. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview

Kim, C., & Yang, S. U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449.

Kwon, K. H. Moon, S. I., & Stefanone, M. A. (2015). Unspeaking on Facebook? Testing network

effects on self-censorship of political expressions in social network sites. Quality and

Quantity, 49(4), 1417–1435.

Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2017). From online disagreement to offline action: How diverse motivations for using social media can increase political information sharing and catalyze offline political participation. Social Media and Society, 3(3), 2056305117716274.

Magpanthong, C., & McDaniel, D. (2015). Online expression of emotions and personal viewpoints: A case study of Facebook usage among Thai and US Students. BU Academic Review, 14(2), 83-99.

Magpanthong, C., & McDaniel, D. (2016). Online readers responses to news stories on Thai newspaper Facebook pages. In Creative Industries in Asia: Innovating Within Constraints International Conference (pp. 182-200). Bangkok: Bangkok University.

Nash, S. M. (2015). Life beyond the like: Uses & gratifications of sharing business Facebook page content (Master's thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln).

Nolan, D. (1971). Classifying and analysing politico-economic systems. The Individualist, 1, 5-11.

Nuzulita, N., & Subriadi, A. P. (2020). The role of risk-benefit and privacy analysis to understand different uses of social media by Generations X, Y, and Z in Indonesia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(3), e12122.

Paireepairit, I. (2012). Free space of expression: New media and Thailand’s politics. Bangkok: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES).

Panthanuwong, A. (2017). Relationship between social media and political interests and engagement. Journal of Communication Arts, 35(3), 79-93.

Pew Internet Study. (2005). Internet evolution: A decade of adoption: How the internet has woven itself into American life. Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/27/part-1-how-the-internet-has-woven-itself-into-american-life/

Pootrakul, P. (2014). The determinants of selective exposure that influence political tolerance among Thai university students. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.

Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Das, S., McConahy, A. L., Wiese, J., & Cranor, L. F. (2013). The post that wasn't: Exploring self-censorship on facebook. Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://www.cs.utah.edu/~wiese/publications/PostThatWasnt.pdf

Srimahawaro, V. (2014). The representative democracy: Problems and alternative model of Thai political development. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 55-92.

Taber, K. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.

Thorson, K., Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., & Pak, C. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183-200.

Tsfati, Y. (2016). A new measure for the tendency to select ideologically congruent political information: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 1-28.