Prime Ministerial Term Limit: Adopted, Abused, and Abandoned
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.269967Keywords:
Term limit, Abusive constitutional borrowing, Prayut Chan-ocha, Constitutional courtAbstract
Since 2007, Thailand has introduced a prime ministerial term limit into its constitutional system. However, the purpose of this term limit appears not to prevent an elected tyranny but rather to obstruct enemies of the conservative establishment who have been entrenching their presence in Thailand’s volatile politics. The measure was put to the test when Prayuth Chan-ocha, the junta leader and one of Thailand’s longest serving prime ministers, hit the eight-years term limit. The Constitutional Court was willing to ignore the law and save him. This article traces the adoption of the prime ministerial term limit and highlights the constitutional court decision as a case study of an abusive constitutional borrowing.
References
Abebe, Adem K. “It’s Time for the African Union to Put a Stop to ‘Third-termism.’” Al Jazeera (8 July 2019). https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/7/8/its-time-for-the-african-union-to-put-a-stop-to-third-termism
Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Phongpaichit. A History of Thailand (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139656993
“Cambodia: Son of Long Time Ruler Hun Sen Becomes PM in Historic Transfer of Power.” The Guardian (22 August 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/22/who-is-cambodia-pm-hun-manet-hun-sen-son-transfer-of-power
“China’s Leader Xi Jinping Secures Third Term and Stacks Inner Circle with Loyalists.” The Guardian (23 October 2022). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/23/xi-jinping-to-rule-china-for-precedent-breaking-third-term
“Constitutional Referendum to Remove Presidential Term Limits Divides Central African Republic.” AP News (7 July 2023). https://apnews.com/article/central-african-republic-referendum-vote-constitution-democracy-e1ce818f27fcfcbc7452003a9fa7ef02
Desatova, Petra, and Saowanee T. Alexander. “Election Commissions and Non-Democratic Outcomes: Thailand’s Contentious 2019 Election.” (2021) 43(4) Politics 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211000978
Dixon, Rosalind, and David Landau. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal Globalization and the Subversion of Liberal Democracy (Oxford University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001
“Evo Morales Returns to Bolivia, Ending Year in Exile.” AP News (10 November 2020). https://apnews.com/article/argentina-bolivia-latin-america-evo-morales-4f5ff3b663086bacd71c7f3672c3d014
Ginsburg, Tom. “Constitutional Afterlife: The Continuing Impact of Thailand’s Postpolitical Constitution.” (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 83. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon031
Ginsburg, Tom, Zachary Elkins, and James Melton. “Do Executive Term Limits Cause Constitutional Crises?” In Tom Ginsburg (ed), Comparative Constitutional Design (Cambridge University Press 2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139105712.016
Hewison, Kewin. “Thaksin Shinwatra and the Reshaping of Thai Politics.” (2010) 16 Contemporary Politics 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569771003783810
Hewison, Kevin, and Kengkij Kitirianglarp. “‘Thai-Style Democracy:’ The Royalist Struggle for Thailand’s Politics.” In Søren Ivarsson and Lotte Isager (eds). Saying the Unsayable. Monarchy and Democracy in Thailand (Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press 2010) 186–92. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs33-1f
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Entrenching the Minority: The Constitutional Court in Thailand’s Political Conflict.” (2017) 26(2) Washington International Law Journal 247.
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Hope v Reality: Can Thailand’s Military be Trusted?” Constitutionnet (29 August 2014). https://constitutionnet.org/news/hope-v-reality-can-thailands-military-be-trusted
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Thailand.” In Richard Albert et al. (eds), 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law (I·CONnect, Clough Center 2018).
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Thailand.” In Richard Albert et al. (eds), 2019 Global Review of Constitutional Law (I·CONnect, Clough Center 2020).
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Thailand.” In Richard Albert et al. (eds), The I·CONnect-Clough Center 2020 Global Review of Constitutional Law (Clough Center for the Study of Constitutional Democracy 2021).
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Thailand’s Unamendabiltiy: Politics of Two Democracies.” In Rehan Abeyratne and Ngoc Son Bui (eds). The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Asia (Routledge 2021). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003097099
Landau, David. “Abusive Constitutionalism.” (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189.
“Law Lecturers Advise Constitutional Court Judges PM’s Term Expires by Aug 24.” Thai PBS (16 August 2022). https://www.thaipbsworld.com/law-lecturers-advise-constitutional-court-judges-pms-term-expires-by-aug-24/
McCargo, Duncan. “Thailand in 2014: The Trouble with Magic Swords.” In Daljit Singh (ed), Southeast Asian Affairs 2015 (ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute 2015). https://doi.org/10.1355/aa15-1s
McCargo, Duncan, Saowanee T. Alexander, and Petra Desatova. “Ordering Peace: Thailand’s 2016 Constitutional Referendum.” (2017) 39 Contemporary Southeast Asia 65. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-1b
Mérieau, Eugénie. “Thailand in 2018: Military Dictatorship under Royal Command.” In Daljit Singh and Malcolm Cook (eds). Southeast Asian Affairs 2019 (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 2019). https://doi.org/10.1355/aa19-1t
Mérieau, Eugénie. “Thailand’s Deep State, Royal Power and the Constitutional Court (1997–2016).” (2016) 46 Journal of Contemporary Asia 445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1151917
Overholt, William H. “The Rise and Fall of Ferdinand Marcos.” (1986) 26 Asian Survey 1137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644313
Prajak Kongkirati. “Thailand’s Failed 2014 Election: The Anti-Election Movement, Violence, and Democratic Breakdown.” (2016) 46(3) Journal of Contemporary Asia 467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1166259
“Prayut Signs Up with United Thai Nation Party.” Bangkok Post (9 Jan 2023). https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/2478609
Ricks, Jacob I. “Thailand’s 2019 Vote: The General’s Election.” (2019) 92(3) Pacific Affairs 443. https://doi.org/10.5509/2019923443
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Autocratic Legalism.” (2018) 85(2) The University of Chicago Law Review 545.
“Senegal’s Macky Sall Rules Out Third Term after Deadly Protests.” Al Jazeera (4 July 2023). https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/7/4/senegals-macky-sall-rules-out-third-term-after-violent-unrest
Siripan Nogsuan Swasdee. “Electoral Integrity and the Repercussions of Institutional Manipulations: The 2019 General Election in Thailand.” (2019) 5(1) Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119892321
Tejapira, Kasian. “Toppling Thaksin.” (2006) 39 New Left Review 5.
“Thailand: An Abuse of Judicial Review.” In Yap Po Jen (ed), The Judicial Review of Elections in Asia (Routledge 2016). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668567
“Thai Lawmakers Vote to Impeach Ousted Premier.” NPR (23 January 2015). https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/01/23/379311642/thai-lawmakers-vote-to-impeach-ousted-premier.
Versteeg, Mila, Timothy Horley, Anne Meng, Mauricio Guim, and Marilyn Guirguis. “The Law and Politics of Presidential Term Limit Evasion.” (2020) 120 Columbia Law Review 173.
Sources in Thai
กมลชัย รัตนสกาววงศ์. “ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญและวิธีพิจารณา.” In ธนาพล อิ๋วสกุล (ed). การปฏิรูปการเมืองไทย ฐานคิดและข้อเสนอว่าด้วยการออกแบบรัฐธรรมนูญฉบับประชาชน ปี 2540 [Kamonchai Rattanasakawong. “Constitutional Court and Its Procedures.” In Thanapol Ewsakul (ed). Thailand’s Political Reform: Basis and Proposal for Designing the People’s Constitution in 1997] (Thailand Research Fund 2017) 508–53.
“ทักษิณ : ‘เราต้องเป็นรัฐบาลอีก 20 ปี—ทำการเมืองอย่างสร้างสรรค์’ ” [“Thaksin: ‘We Must be Government for Another 20 Years—Committed to Constructive Politics’.”] Voice Online (26 July 2018). https://www.voicetv.co.th/read/rJTmgJw4Q
บวรศักดิ์ อุวรรณโณ. “ระบบการตรวจสอบทุจริตของผู้ดำรงตำแหน่งระดับสูง.” [Borwornsak Uwanno. “Corruption Scrutiny for High-Level Office Holders.”] In Thanapol Ewsakul (ed). Thailand’s Political Reform: Basis and Proposal for Designing the People’s Constitution in 1997] (Thailand Research Fund 2017) 554–627.
“ป.ป.ช.ไม่ ‘เปิดเผย’ บัญชีทรัพย์สินประยุทธ์ ที่ยื่นตอนเข้ารับตำแหน่งนายกฯ รอบสอง.” [“NACC Does Not Disclose Prayuth’s Assets in His Second Round of PM.”] The Matter (6 April 2021). https://thematter.co/brief/139973/139973
“เปิดคำชี้แจง ‘มีชัย’ ชี้วาระนายกฯ 8 ปี ‘ประยุทธ์’ เริ่มนับวันประกาศใช้ รธน.ปี 60.” [Meechai’s Memo Suggests Prayuth’s Term Begun in 2017.] Prachatai (6 September 2022). https://prachatai.com/journal/2022/09/100392
“ฝ่ายค้านส่งความเห็นค้าน ‘มีชัย’ ยัน ‘ประยุทธ์’ เป็นนายกฯ นับปี 60 อัดลืมบันทึกประชุม กรธ.” [Opposition Opposes Meechai’s Memo.] Voice TV (7 September 2022). https://voicetv.co.th/read/W4yAnnHBy
วิษณุ วรัญญู. “องค์กรของรัฐที่เป็นอิสระ.” [Vishnu Varunyou. “Independent Public Agency.”] In Thanapol Ewsakul (ed). Thailand’s Political Reform: Basis and Proposal for Designing the People’s Constitution in 1997] (Thailand Research Fund 2017) 467–507.
“สรุปความเห็น 3 ตุลาการเสียงข้างน้อย ผู้ชี้ว่า พล.อ. ประยุทธ์เป็น ‘นายกฯ 8 ปี’ แล้ว.” [“Summary of 3 Minority Judges on Prayuth’s Case.”] BBC Thai (7 October 2022). https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cv2nd39jvndo
สมคิด เลิศไพฑูรย์. “พระราชบัญญัติประกอบรัฐธรรมนูญ.” [Somkid Lertpaitoon, “Organic Act.”] In Thanapol Ewsakul (ed). Thailand’s Political Reform: Basis and Proposal for Designing the People’s Constitution in 1997] (Thailand Research Fund 2017) 53–80.
“อนาคตของประยุทธ์หลังคำตัดสินศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ ‘แคนดิเดตนายกฯ หรือองคมนตรี ???’ ” [“Future of Prayuth After the Constitutional Court’s Decision: ‘Prime Ministerial Candidate or Privy Councillor???’ ”] iLaw (4 October 2022). https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/6278
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but grant Thai Legal Studies the right of first publication in English and to distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (“CC BY 4.0”). It allows others to freely share the work, including the making of translations. There is no charge or fee for readers to immediately view published articles or content, and users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from Thai Legal Studies or the author(s), the only requirement being that an acknowledgement is given of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in English by Thai Legal Studies.
