Looking Around: Should Thailand Promote Mediation Effectiveness and How?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.270008Keywords:
Mediation, Alternative dispute resolution, Thai mediation, Singapore mediation, Singapore Convention on MediationAbstract
Mediation as a form of alternative dispute resolution has many advantages compared to other dispute resolution methods, especially those of adjudicatory nature, such as litigation and arbitration. Thailand and Singapore share a similar policy of advocating the practice of mediation. That said, Thailand seems to focus principally on domestic mediation, while Singapore tends to position itself as a mediation hub for international disputes. In terms of the legal framework, both countries have enacted legislation and regulations that endorse, effectuate, and facilitate mediation. In both jurisdictions, these laws and regulations aim to uphold the principle of party autonomy, provide the necessary support, create a mediation-friendly climate, maintain the integrity of the process, and ensure the enforceability of valid mediated settlement agreements. This article, which is intended to be descriptive, discusses some important concepts and characteristics of mediation and explores the legal frameworks of mediation in Thailand and Singapore, as well as both countries’ experiences in dealing with this non-adversarial dispute settlement mechanism.
References
“About the SIMI Credentialing Scheme.” Singapore International Mediation Institute. https://www.simi.org.sg/What-We-Offer/Mediators/SIMI-Credentialing-Scheme
“About Us.” Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management. https://www.tal.sg/tadm/about
Alexander, Nadja. “The Singapore Convention: What Happens after The Ink Has Dried?” (2020) 30(2) American Review of International Arbitration.
Alexander, Nadja, Joel Lee, and Kit-Wye Lum. Singapore Mediation Handbook (2019).
“Arb-Med-Arb.” Singapore International Mediation Centre. https://simc.com.sg/dispute-resolution/arb-med-arb/
Chalat Pratheuangrattana. “The Development of Mediation in Thailand from the Past to Present Toward the Future.” (2021) 19 King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal 114.
Chotechuong Thapvongse. “Court-Annexed Mediation.” In Collected Essays: Mediation and Introduction to Relevant Laws (Alternative Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Judiciary, 2002).
Chua, Eunice. “Free the Earth Move – Shifts in the International Dispute Resolution Landscape.” Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy (2018). https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/feel-earth-move-shifts-international--landscape
Fox, E. M., and L. Urwick (eds). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follet (London: Pitman, 1973).
“A Historical Perspective of Dispute Resolution in the Region – What Lessons Can We Draw for Today?” Singapore Mediation Lecture 2022.
Lee, Joel, and Teh Hwee Hwee (eds). Asian Perspective on Mediation (Singapore Academy Publishing, 2009).
Lee, Joel. “Singapore Developments – The Mediation Act 2016.” Kluwer Mediation Blog (2017). http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/03/12/singapore-developments-the-mediation-act-2016/
Lim, Gloria. “International Commercial Mediation, The Singapore Model.” (2019) 31 Singapore Academy Law Journal 377.
“Mediation.” Singapore Law Watch, s 2B. https://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/About-Singapore-Law/Overview/ch-03-mediation
Neti Kitkoson. “Problem Regarding the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Court: Mediation on Civil Dispute.” (Master Thesis, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University 2013).
Nopporn Bhotirungsiyakorn. “History of Alternative Dispute Resolution.” (2020) 67 Journal of the Court of Justice 1.
Pattrawn Kettuluk, and Thanee Vorapatr. “The Conciliation Dispute of Private Organization: Case Study on the Dispute Resolution Act 2019.” (2022) 6 The Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Science, School of Law Chiang Rai Rajabhat University 225.
Sawaporn Nussti. “Legal Measures Relating to Legal Executions in Accordance with the Contract of Compromise by Office of the Attorney General.” (2018) 28 Payap University Journal 121.
Sim, Christine. “The International Reach of the Singapore Mediation Act.” Kluwer Mediation Blog (2017). http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/12/17/international-reach-singapore-mediation-act/
Sorawit Limparangsri. “Alternative Dispute Resolution in ASEAN: A Contemporary Thai Perspective.” (2007) 2 Thai Arbitration Institute Journal of Arbitration 13.
Sorawit Limparangsri, and Prachya Yuprasert. “Arbitration and Mediation in ASEAN: Laws and Practice From a Thai Perspective.” (2003) 203. https://coj.go.th/th/file/get/file/20181122649840e5fdaea8a5c1378bd6c83a9570084334.pdf
Srunyoo Potiratchatangkoon. “Mediation in the Administrative Court of Thailand: Experiences and Current Situation.” (2021). https://www.admincourt.go.th/adminCourt/en/article_detail.php?id=439
Suchada Srimai, and Tossaporn Jindawan. “Mediation: A Comparative Study of People Sector and Village Committee.” (2021) 5 Law and Local Society Journal 145.
Tawan Manakul. “Mediation in Thailand.” National Health Foundation.
Tay, Patrick. “Testimonials.” Singapore Mediation Centre. https://www.mediation.com.sg/about-us/testimonials/#:~:text=the%20Singapore%20Mediation%20Centre%20(SMC,disputes%20resolved%20within%20a%20day
Teh, Hwee Hwee. “Mediation Practices in ASEAN: The Singapore Experience.” (2012). https://docplayer.net/61740617-Mediation-practices-in-asean-the-singapore-experience-teh-hwee-hwee.html
Thanee Vorapatr, and Wichet Sinprasitkul. “Compilation of Cases on Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation in Thailand from B.E. 2557–2561.” Thailand Arbitration Center (2019). https://thac.or.th/v1/file/20200225%20โครงการวิจัยเรื่องการบังคับตามสัญญาประนีประนอมยอมความช่วงปีพ.ศ.2557-2561.pdf
Udom Ngammuangsakul, and Wimonrekha Sirichairawan. “Laws on Public-Engaging Mediation.” (2020) 49 Thammasat Law Journal 297.
Vichai Ariyanuntaka. “Court-Annexed ADR: A New Challenge.” (2002). https://coj.go.th/th/file/get/file/20181122cc23400755be6e9d60e67eb10c2284da084331.pdf
Vijayendran, Gregory. “Considering Conciliation.” The Law Society of Singapore. https://v1.lawgazette.com.sg/2017-07/1897.htm
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Francis Goh, Amnart Tangkiriphimarn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but grant Thai Legal Studies the right of first publication in English and to distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (“CC BY 4.0”). It allows others to freely share the work, including the making of translations. There is no charge or fee for readers to immediately view published articles or content, and users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from Thai Legal Studies or the author(s), the only requirement being that an acknowledgement is given of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in English by Thai Legal Studies.
