Design of ergonomic work facilities on assembly station of mozaic stone for increasing work productivity
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to improve work facilities’ designs ergonomically on the assembly station with the goal of increasing work productivity using an anthropometry database approach. One of the production processes in small and medium enterprises was the stone assembly. The stone assembly was conducted by an operator who sits on a small bench and uses a box-shaped can as a table. The operator worked in a bent position, head bowed and both legs folded. According to Standardised Nordic Questionnaires, the worker suffered from pain in the neck, shoulders, elbows, wrists, back, buttocks, and knees, negatively affecting their work productivity. This research applied the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) method to assess the postures of the worker’s upper limb during working h. The concept of ergonomics was used for the designing of work facilities. The anthropometric data was taken as reference for the dimension of assembly work facilities design which matched the body dimension of the worker. In terms of RULA score, both proposed layouts (score 4) indicated an improvement compared to the initial layout (score 7). Regarding the standard time, both of those layouts showed a decrease in the standard time of 40% and 44%, respectively when compared to the initial condition. Related to the standard output, it indicated that there was an increase of 200% in terms of productivity when compared to the initial condition. Furthermore, there was a decrease at the level of uncomfortable from 80% to 30%. The second proposed layout alternative recommended a better improvement than the first one.
Article Details
References
Declaration of HumanEntrepreneurship in Jakarta, Indonesia [Internet]. International Council for Small Business. 2015 [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: https://icsb.org/declaration-of-humanentrepreneurship -in-jakarta-indonesia/
Sutalaksana IZ, Widyanti A. Anthropometry approach in workplace redesign in Indonesian Sundanese roof tile industries. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;53:299-305.
Kristanto A, Fanany DF. Improvement of working position on frying pan lathing process using the ergonomics approach (A case study at WL alumunium metal casting yogyakarta). In: 3th International Conference on Green World in Business and Technology (ICGWBT). Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2014. p. D-21.
Del Prado-Lu JL. Anthropometric measurement of Filipino manufacturing workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(6):497-503.
Mokdad M, Al-Ansari M. Anthropometrics for the design of Bahraini school furniture. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(5):728-735.
Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F. New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41(1):30-42.
Pheasant S. Bodyspace Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the design of work. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 1998.
Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):233-237.
Karwowski W. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
Govil N, DeMayo WM, Hirsch BE, McCall AA. Optimizing positioning for in-office otology procedures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(1):156-160.
McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(2):91-99.
Barnes RM. Motion and Time Study. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980.
Hartanti LPS. Work measurement approach to determine standard time in assembly line. Int J Manag Appl Sci. 2016;2(10 Special Issue-1):192-195.
Kushwaha DK, Kane PV. Ergonomic assessment and workstation design of shipping crane cabin in steel industry. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;52:29-39.
Bridger RS. Introduction to ergonomics. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2003.
Zare M, Croq M, Hossein‐Arabi F, Brunet R, Roquelaure Y. Does ergonomics improve product quality and reduce costs? a review article. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 2016;26(2):205-223.
Deros BM, Yusoff ARM, Ismail SJ, Daruis DDI. Optimizing workstation design for standing work system in an electronics assembly work. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(1):17-24.
Zakerian SA, Garosi E, Abdi Z, Bakhshi E, Kamrani M, Kalantari R. Studying the influence of workplace design on productivity of bank clerks. Health Saf Work. 2016;6(2):35-42.