A Study of the Need for Managing the Bachelor of Business Administration Program with International Cooperation Towards Internationalization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aims to study the current state, desired state, and necessary needs for the management of the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) program that involves collaboration between Thai higher education institutions and foreign vocational institutions. Data was collected through questionnaires distributed to 45 faculty members involved in the BBA program related to international business from both public and private higher education institutions. The research findings are as follows: 1) Curriculum Management: Both public and private sectors emphasize online learning and the use of English by instructors. The desired state for the public sector focuses on learning outside the classroom, while the private sector prioritizes virtual learning environments. The necessary need is to develop more learning spaces outside the classroom. 2) Academic Administration: Both sectors emphasize teaching through electronic media and blended learning. The desired state focuses on integrating flexible content that is appropriate for the modern era. The necessary need is for comprehensive assessment and quality assurance through participation from various stakeholders to enhance educational standards. 3) Internship Experience: Both public and private sectors emphasize planning and evaluating internship experiences. The public sector focuses on online internships and evaluations by instructors, while the private sector uses the Backward Design approach and workplace simulation methods. The desired state places importance on evaluations from both instructors and employers. The highest necessary need is preparing for online internships and evaluating students' performance.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Any views and comments in the Journal of Social Innovation and Lifelong Learning are the authors’ views. The editorial staff have not to agree with those views and it is not considered as the editorial’s responsibility.
2. The responsibility of content and draft check of each article belongs to each author. In case, there is any lawsuit about copyright infringement. It is considered as the authors’ sole responsibility.
3. The article copyright belonging to the authors and The Far Eastern University are copyrighted legally. Republication must be received direct permission from the authors and The Far Eastern University in written form.
References
กัญญาณัฐ์ เตโชติอัศนีย์. (2562, 7 พฤศจิกายน). ผลการจัดอันดับความสามารถในการใช้ภาษาอังกฤษ โดยดัชนี EF English Proficiency Index ปี 2019. https://thestandard.co/ef-english-proficiency-index-2019
คณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา. (2560). มาตรฐานคุณวุฒิระดับอุดมศึกษาแห่งชาติ. สำนักงานปลัดกระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
จรัญญา เทพพรบัญชากิจ. (2556). แนวทางการบริหารจัดการหลักสูตรนานาชาติของมหาวิทยาลัยเอกชนไทย. วารสารมหาวิทยาลัยพายัพ, 23(2), 25-46. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pyu/article/view/135394
ทิวา ดอนลาว, สมพร เฟื่องจันทร์, เพ็ญศรี ฉิรินัง และ วิวัฒน์ กรมดิษฐ์. (2564). อนาคตแรงงานไทยภายใต้ภาวะเศรษฐกิจที่เปลี่ยนแปลง. วารสารนวัตกรรมการบริหารและการจัดการ, 9(1), 35-44. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RCIM/article/view/248766
ภัทรวรรธน์ นิลแก้วบวรวิชญ์. (2559). รูปแบบการพัฒนาเครือข่ายความร่วมมือทางวิชาการของสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาสังกัดสำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาดุษฎีบัณฑิต]. มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา. https://buuir.buu.ac.th/bitstream/1234567890/1234567890/11560/1/54820015.pdf
ศิริพร อาจปักษา. (2557). การประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น: แนวคิดและแนวปฏิบัติ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สุบรรณ เอี่ยมวิจารณ์. (2561). การบริหารจัดการหลักสูตรในศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งมหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2552). การวิจัยและพัฒนาหลักสูตร. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
CEDEFOP. (2023). Supporting learning pathways: Building bridges between VET and higher education. Publications Office of the European Union.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
European Commission. (2021). European skills agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1223.
Gudoniene, D, Staneviciene, E, Huet, I, Dickel, J, Dieng, D, Degroote, J, Rocio, V, Butkienė, R & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 17(2), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756
ILO. (2021). Skills for a resilient youth in the era of COVID-19 and beyond. International Labour Organization. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/07/wysd_2020_concept_note_final.pdf
Fleacă, B, Fleaca, E & Osiceanu Maiduc, S. (2022). Digital Transformation and Current Challenges of Higher Education. TEM Journal, 11(3), 1235-1241. https://www.temjournal.com/content/113/TEMJournalAugust2022_1235_1241.pdf
McLaughlin, P., & Mills, A. (2011). Combining vocational and higher education studies to provide dual parallel qualifications – an Australian case study. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2010.541563
Istenič, A. (2024). Blended learning in higher education: the integrated and distributed model and a thematic analysis. Discover Education, 3, 165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00239-y
Nazzi, A. (2019). Collaboration for transition between TVET and university: a proposal. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), 1428-1443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0197
OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2022). Strengthening Apprenticeship in Scotland, United Kingdom. OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/2db395dd-en
Selingo, J., Clark, C., & Noone, D. (2021). The hybrid campus: Three major shifts for the future of higher education. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/articles/6756_CGI-Higher-ed-COVID/DI_CGI-Higher-ed-COVID.pdf
UNESCO. (2020). Embracing a culture of lifelong learning: Contribution to the Futures of Education initiative. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374112
Wibrow, Bridget. (2022). VET and higher education pathways – do outcomes differ for the same occupation? NCVER. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED623391.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
Yorke, M., & Knight, P. T. (2006). Embedding employability into the curriculum. Higher Education Academy.