Enhancing 6Cs Skills through a Transnational Design Thinking Online Program in Higher Education Program among Thai and Taiwanese EFL Learners

Article Sidebar

PDF
เผยแพร่แล้ว: ธ.ค. 29, 2025

Main Article Content

Krittika Inta
Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
Arpasri Tewata
Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
Sumana Sorathiwa
Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
Tawan Watakit
Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
Supornphan Konchiab
Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

บทคัดย่อ

The objectives of this research were to 1) analyze and compare the levels of the 6Cs skills perceived by EFL students before and after participating in the transnational design thinking online program in higher education, and 2) to examine the concordance between facilitators' evaluation and students' self-assessment regarding 6Cs skills following participation in the program for 10 days. Using a quantitative approach, the data were collected from 28 Thai and Taiwanese EFL learners from two universities. The research instruments were pre- and post-self-assessments, and facilitators’ evaluation. The statistical analysis revealed that students' self-assessment scores before and after the program differed significantly at the 0.05 level. The average scores after the program improved in the following areas: communication skills, critical thinking and problem-solving skills, creativity and innovation skills, and conceptual understanding, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the average scores for collaboration and intercultural communication skills before and after the program. In addition, when comparing the facilitators’ evaluation with the students’ post-self-assessment, both showed consistent results. The highest ratings were found in collaboration and intercultural communication skills. Meanwhile, communication, critical thinking and problem-solving, as well as creativity and innovation were rated at a high level. However, the facilitators' evaluation of conceptual understanding differed from the students’ post-self-assessment. In conclusion, integrating design thinking into EFL learning can enhance learners’ communication, creativity, and collaboration skills, supporting language and skill development. Moreover, implementing ongoing DT cycles and reflection in language classrooms can help cultivate future competencies that support lifelong learning.

Article Details

ฉบับ
ปีที่ 19 ฉบับที่ 3 (2025): กันยายน - ธันวาคม 2568 (In Progress)
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย
Creative Commons License

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

1. ทัศนะและข้อคิดเห็นใดๆ ในวารสารนวัตกรรมสังคมและการเรียนรู้ตลอดชีวิตเป็นทัศนะของผู้เขียน กองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นพ้องด้วยกับทัศนะเหล่านั้นและไม่ถือว่าเป็นความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ
2. ความรับผิดชอบด้านเนื้อหาและการตรวจร่างบทความแต่ละบทเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน กรณีมีการฟ้องร้องเรื่องการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนแต่เพียงฝ่ายเดียว
3. ลิขสิทธิ์บทความเป็นของผู้เขียนและมหาวิทยาลัยฟาร์อีสเทอร์นได้รับการสงวนสิทธิ์ตามกฎหมาย การตีพิมพ์ซ้ำต้องได้รับอนุญาตโดยตรงจากผู้เขียนและมหาวิทยาลัยฟาร์อีสเทอร์นเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร

ประวัติผู้แต่ง

Krittika Inta, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

Miss Krittika Inta graduated from Chiang Mai University, Thailand, in 2010 with a Master of Education in Teaching English. She has experience teaching English for 20 years and has worked with the community for several years. Now, she is an English lecturer at RMUTL specializing in teaching English , Active Learning, Design Thinking and Social Innovation. She was also trained and got a certificate as a facilitator in Design Thinking from Singapore and facilitated many international exchange projects. Her research interests include EFL, intercultural Communication, Social Innovation, and Design Thinking.

Arpasri Tewata, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

Miss Arpasri Tewata lecturer in the Business Administration Program, majoring in Business Management, at the Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (RMUTL), Chiang Mai, Thailand. With expertise in Business Administration, Marketing, Management, and Design Thinking, she has been actively engaged in both academic and community development initiatives. Her research interests encompass community economic development, consumer behavior. She was also trained and got a certificate as a facilitator in Design Thinking from Singapore and facilitated many international exchange projects.

Sumana Sorathiwa, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

Miss Sumana Sorathiwa earned her LL.B. from Thammasat University and LL.M. in Digital Law from Chiang Mai University. She is currently a junior lecturer at RMUTL, teaching Business Law, Commercial Law, International Trade Law, and International Business Ethics. With prior experience as an International Relations Officer, she actively conducts international exchange programs and promotes cross-cultural learning. She incorporates design thinking and activity-based learning in her teaching and holds a certification in Design Thinking from Singapore Polytechnic. Her research interests include digital law, international trade, legal education, and the application of innovative, experiential teaching methods in higher education.

Tawan Watakit, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

Tawan Watakit earned his Ph.D. in Psychology from Chulalongkorn University in 2014. He also holds a Master of Science in Counseling Psychology (2004) and a Bachelor of Education in English (2000) from Chiang Mai University, Thailand. In addition, he received a certificate as a facilitator in Design Thinking from Singapore. With over two decades of academic and counseling experience. With over two decades of academic and counseling experience. He has consistently contributed to both psychological education and community development. He currently serves as a lecturer and the Associate Dean for Research and Academic Services at the Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (RMUTL). His areas of expertise include education, counseling psychology, holistic well-being, self-esteem enhancement, and therapeutic program development.

Supornphan Konchiab, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

ssist. Prof. Dr. Supornphan Konchiab is a lectuer in English for International Communication Program, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna. She graduated in PhD (Education) from Massey University, NZ, in 2015. She has experience teaching English as a Foreign Language for 25 years. Her research interests include ESP, Action Research, and Design Thinking. She was also trained and certified as a Design Thinking facilitator in Design Thinking from Singapore. She has facilitated Thai and International students learning through Design Thinking in many international exchange projects.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Almache-Granda, G., Aguilar-Parra, J., Ramírez-Romero, E., & Coello-Vásquez, V. (2024). Design Thinking to Facilitate the Development of TEFL Students’ Competencies. Polo del Conocimiento, 9(12), 1345-1361. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/8545

Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92,141. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5248069_Design_Thinking

Buphate, T. & Esteban, R. H. (2022). Using ideation discussion activities in Design Thinking to develop EFL students’ speaking and critical thinking abilities. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 682-708. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256743

Buphate, T., Inta, K., & Esteban, R. (2018). A CLIL Approach in Thailand University Setting: Teaching Design Thinking Through English. In Proceedings of The International Conference on English Language Studies 2018, (pp.58-72). Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. http://soctech.sut.ac.th/fl/newfl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Proceeding_ICELS-2018.pdf

Cleminson, T. & Cowie, N. (2021). Using design thinking as an approach to creative and communicative and communicative engagement in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4). 1-22. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.7

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process

Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.421

EF SET. (n.d.). The leading English test for free online certification. https://www.efset.org

Galloway, N., Kriukow, J. & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan [Report]. British Council ELTRA Papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320183212

Guaman‑Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: A multi‑actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(3), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z

Indrianto, A. T. L., Oktavio, A., Azmi, A., Abdullah, A., Isa, N. M., Adityaji, R., & Subadi, L. C. (2024). Exploration of the teaching and learning model using the design thinking method in developing community-based tourism. Revista De Gestão – RGSA, 18(1), Article e04740. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-061

Jones, P. A. (2024). Design Thinking in Action: Fostering 21st-Century Skills Alongside Subject Specific Knowledge at Key Stage 3 in D&T. Design and Technology Education, 29(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.24377/DTEIJ.article2425

Kachru, B.B. (1985) English in the World: Teaching are the language and literatures (pp. 11-30). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kang, N. (2021). Design-thinking framed EFL autonomous learning through interactive

e-journaling. STEM Journal, 22(1), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2021.22.1.91

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3

Konchiab, S., & Gunjina, M. (2020). Self -assessments on Learning and Innovation Skills of Thai Students Participating in Design Thinking for Social Innovation Activities. Journals for Community Development and Life Quality, 8(2), 327-338. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JCDLQ/article/view/244740

Kurokawa, T. (2013). Design thinking education at universities and graduate schools. Science & Technology Trends Quarterly Review, 46, 50–62. https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/Science-Technology-Trends-Quarterly-Review-No.46%EF%BC%8Dreport4.pdf

Lim, M. A. (2024). Internationalisation and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in higher education: The promise of internationalism and the danger of positionalism. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 5(2), 22-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.61186/johepal.5.2.22

Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J. (2025). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01

Minet, A., Wentzel, D., Raff, S. & Garbas, J. (2024). Design Thinking in physical and virtual environments: Conceptual foundations, qualitative analysis, and practical implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 10-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123596

Moffett, J., Little, R., Illing, J., Carvalho Filho, M., & Bok, H. (2024). Establishing psychological safety in online design-thinking education: a qualitative study. Learning Environments Research, 27, 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning Definitions. Battelle for Kids. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Sándorová, S., Repánová, T., Palenčíková, Z., & Beták, N. (2020). Design thinking - A revolutionary new approach in tourism education? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 26, 100238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100238

Seevaratnam, V., Gannaway, D., & Lodge, J. (2023). Design thinking-learning and lifelong learning for employability in the 21st century. The Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 14(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no1art1631

Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2020). Accelerating Education for the SDGs in Universities: A guide for universities, colleges, and tertiary and higher education institutions. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

Stoev, P., Stoeva, M., & Shotlekov, I. (2023). Building Career Skills in Computer Science Students through Design Thinking Hackathons. In M. Shelley, O. T. Ozturk, & M. L. Ciddi, Proceedings of ICEMST 2023 International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (pp. 304-317), Cappadocia, Turkiye. ISTES Organization.

Swallow, D., & Tomalin, B. (2024). Design thinking in education: A paradigm shift in language learning. Training, Language and Culture, 8(4), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-4-86-94

United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, 42809, 1-13. https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/70/1

Vallis, C., & Redmond, P. (2021). Introducing design thinking online to large business education courses for twenty-first century learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(6), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.6.14

Withell, A., & Haigh, N. (2013). Developing design thinking expertise in higher education. In Reitan, J.B., Lloyd, P., Bohemia, E., Nielsen, L.M., Digranes, I., & Lutnæs, E. (Eds.), DRS Cumulus: Design Learning for Tomorrow: 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers (pp.1-13). Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.160

Yeh, Y. C. & L, J. H. (2023). The Impact of Innovative Learning of University Students Participating in Interactive Online Design Thinking Workshop: A Case Study in One University at Sothern Taiwan. General Education and Transdisciplinary Research, 28, 40-64. https://libap.nhu.edu.tw/citesys/jnPaperDetail.aspx?pID=11510