อิทธิพลของความถี่ของประเภทคำและผลกระทบของภาษาแม่ที่มีต่อการใช้โครงสร้างภาษาอังกฤษที่ไม่เป็นไปตามแบบแผนในงานเขียนของนักวิชาการไทย/The Influence of Word-Type Frequency and Mother Tongue Effects on Non-Conventional English-Structure Usage in Thai Academics’ Writing

Authors

  • Michael Guy Currie Prince of Songkla University
  • Kemtong Sinwongsuwat
  • Kathleen Nicoletti

Keywords:

Academic writing, error analysis, language structure, word type, word frequency

Abstract

The study reported analyzed 26 manuscripts written by Thai academics for publication in English language journals, based on suggestions for changes made by a native-English speaking editor prior to submission, with the aim of establishing which areas of English structure cause most problems to Thai writers at this level. The overall study employed a mixed-methods approach although the findings reported in this paper are derived from the quantitative analysis of the non-conventional usage (NCU) of English in the manuscripts. The study followed the broad conceptual approach of error analysis and this paper reviews previous studies of English writing by Thais based on this approach, mostly involving high school or undergraduate students. The paper compares the findings of those papers with those of the study reported, finding that four of the main problem areas identified in those studies (article, verb, preposition and noun usage) were also the structural aspects most frequently identified in the 26 manuscripts analyzed, accounting for more than 80% of the structure NCU. However, the study also analyzed the number of tokens of each word type in the manuscripts and identified a high correlation of 0 .86 between the errors in those word types and the frequency of occurrence of the word types in the manuscripts. Previous studies have not identified such a relationship thus potentially misrepresenting the level of difficulty presented by different word-type usage. Nevertheless the areas giving rise to most problems are  also noted to coincide with areas where Thai language structure differs from English. The paper concludes that although the distribution of word types in the manuscripts is a significant influence on the pattern of NCU, the major factor behind the types of errors to which the participants are prone is the influence of their Thai L1. The paper concludes that a relatively small number of areas need to be targeted in the early teaching of English, notably the use of the definite article, the past and present simple tenses, singular and plural nouns and preposition use generally, in order that problems in these areas should not later become entrenched in higher level usage.

Author Biographies

Kemtong Sinwongsuwat

Assistant Dean for Research and Graduate Studies, Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University

Kathleen Nicoletti

Former lecturer at the Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University

References

Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2012). Investigating move structure of English applied linguistics research article discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1.
Andania, R.A. (2015).The grammatical accuracy, cohesion and coherence of Thai students' English Writing in Darawithaya School, Narathiwat. Unpublished master's thesis, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya, Malaysia
Banlomchon, J. (2006). An error analysis of free compositions in written English by Thai high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis. Christian University, Bangkok, Thailand).
Beckner, C. et al.. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language learning, 59(s1), 1-26.
Bennui, P. (2016). A study of L1 interference in the writing of Thai EFL students. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 4(1), 31.
Bootchuay, T. (2008). An analysis of errors in English writing by a group of first year Thai graduates majoring in English. Unpublished master's thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok.
Chakorn, O. O. (2005) An analysis of lexico-grammatical errors of Thai businesspeople in their English business correspondence. NIDA Language and Communication Journal. 10, 70-94
Chuenchaichon, Y. (2014). A review of EFL writing research studies in Thailand in the past 10 years. Journal of Humanities, 11(1), 13-30.
Clarke, A et al. (2007). Bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. European Journal of Public Health, Vol.17 (Supplement 1): 43–49.
Currie, M., Sinwongsuwat, K., & Nicoletti, K. (2016). Non-conventional English language use in the writing and speech of Thai academic writers: A preliminary study. ESP – Journal of English for Specific Purposes at tertiary level, 4(2), 251-264.
EF-EPI (2017). Downloaded from https://www.ef.co.th/epi/, 2nd March 2018.
Gillet, A. (1996). What is EAP? IATEFL ESP SIG Newsletter, Vol.6, 17-23.
Hinnon, A. (2015). Common errors in English writing and suggested solutions of Thai university students. Humanities and Social Sciences, 31(2), 165-180. Downloaded from: file:///C:/Users/Acer/Downloads/32281-Article%20Text-71843-1-10-20150320%20(2).pdf 2nd March 2018
Hutyamanivudhi, N. 2001. An error analysis of business correspondences concerning construction project at Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited. Unpublished master's Thesis, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology North Bangkok
Iamsiu, C. (2014). An analysis of grammatical errors in Srinakarinwirot University students’ writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, Srinakarinwirot University, Bangkok.
James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.
Jaroongkhongdach, W., Watson Todd, R., Keyuravong, S., & Hall, D. (2012). Differences in quality between Thai and international research articles in ELT. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Vol. 11, 194-209.
Jenwitheesuk, T. (2009). A study of persisted syntactic errors in writing of the 3rd year students of English for international communication program. Proceedings of international conference on the role of university in hands-on education: 2009,Rajamangla University of Technology Lanna. (pp. 982-986). Chiang-Mai, Thailand.
Khamput, P. (2004). First language interference on second language writing of mattayomsuksa 5 students. Unpublished master's thesis, Khon Kaen University. Thailand
Khaoural, P. 2002. A study of error analysis in English composition: case study of English major students of Rajabhat Institute Nakhon Pathom. Unpublished master's thesis, Mahidol University, Bangkok. Abstract downloaded from: https://mulinet11.li.mahidol.ac.th/thesis/scan/4337020.pdf, 20 March 2018.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Larsen, P. O., & Ins, M. von. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 84(3): 575–603.
Lush, B. (2002). Writing errors: A case study of Thai students’ writing errors. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 15(1). 75-82.
Na-Ngam, S. (2004) Common grammatical errors in foundation English I written assignments of Prince of Songkla University student with high and low English entrance examination scores. Unpublished master thesis, Prince of Songkla University Hatyai, Thailand
Nonkukhetkhong, K. (2013). Grammatical error analysis of the first year English major students, Udon Thani Rajabhat University. In the proceedings of the Asian Conference on Language Learning, 2013 (pp. 117-126). Downloaded from: https://iafor.info/archives/offprints/acll2013-offprints/ACLL2013_0068.pdf, 20th March 2018
Nopjirapong, R. (2011). An analysis of article errors in Thai university students’ composition. Unpublished master’s thesis, Srinakarinwirot University, Bangkok.
O’Donnell, L. (2015). An error analysis of Thai EFL learner’s controlled dialogue writing. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 1(8), 1169-1171.
Phetdannui, F. (2016). An analysis of interlingual errors and intralingual errors in Thai EFL students’ writing at Khon Kaen University. Khon Kaen University Research Journal HS (GS) 4 (2) : May - August, 35-51
Pongpairoj, N. (2007) Asymmetric patterns of English article omissions in L2A In Gabrielatos, C., Slessor, R., & Unger, J., W. eds.(2007) Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching, Vol. 1. ps. 103-119
Promsupa, P., Varasarin, P., & Brudhiprabha, P. (2017), An analysis of grammatical errors in English writing of Thai university students. HRD Journal, Vol.8.1
Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: a web-based corpus processing environment, Computing Department, Lancaster University. https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/
Rattanadilok-Na-Phuket, P. & Othman, N. B. (2015). Understanding EFL students' errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99-106.
Richards, J. C. (1970) A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, San Francisco, March 1970.
Rurakwit, M. (2004). Negative transfer, communication strategies, and learning strategies in the English writing of Thammasart University. Unpublished master's thesis. Thammasart University, Bangkok.
Sattayatham, A., & Honsa, S. (2007). Medical students' most frequent errors at Mahidol University, Thailand. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 170-194.
Sattayatham, A., & Ratanapinyowong, P. (2008). Analysis of errors in paragraph writing in English by first year medical students from the four medical schools at Mahidol University. Silpakorn University International Journal, 8, pp.17-38
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 1972, Vol. 10, No. 3.
Sereebenjapol, P. (2003). An analysis of the errors in English which graduate science students make in the discussion section of their thesis. Unpublished master's thesis, Mahidol University, Bangkok. Abstract downloaded fro3/21/2018 https://mulinet11.li.mahidol.ac.th/thesis/2546/4236311.pdf, 20 March 2018.
Sompong, M. (2014). Error analysis. Thammasat review, 16(2), 109-127.
Spillner, B. (2017). Error Analysis in the world. A bibliography (Vol. 37). Berlin, Frank & Timme GmbH.
Srichai, C. 2002. Analysis of errors in written work by first year business administration students at Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai. Unpublished master's thesis, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai.
Suvarnamani, S. (2017) A study of grammatical and lexical errors in descriptive writing of first year arts students at Silpakorn University. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts Vol.17(2): 239-264.
Swan, M. (1996). Practical English usage. Oxford Univ. Press.
Vasconselos, M.R., Sorenson, M.M., & Leta, S. (2009). A new input indicator for the assessment of science and technology research. Scientometrics. Vol. 80, 217–230.
Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2012). Thai EFL students’ writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67

Downloads

Published

2019-04-29

How to Cite

Currie, M. G., Sinwongsuwat, K., & Nicoletti, K. (2019). อิทธิพลของความถี่ของประเภทคำและผลกระทบของภาษาแม่ที่มีต่อการใช้โครงสร้างภาษาอังกฤษที่ไม่เป็นไปตามแบบแผนในงานเขียนของนักวิชาการไทย/The Influence of Word-Type Frequency and Mother Tongue Effects on Non-Conventional English-Structure Usage in Thai Academics’ Writing. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUSOKKU), 36(1), 128–168. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSO/article/view/152229

Issue

Section

บทความ