An Estimation of Portfolio’s Value-at-Risk with Copula: Empirical Evidence from Laos Securities Exchange
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to examine the application of copula in estimating portfolio’s VaR of the two most actively traded stocks (BECL and EDL-Gen) registered in the LSX which can describe the overall movement of the Laos stock market transactions during November 2019 to February 2024. The daily returns of both stocks were calculated to figure out the potential marginal distributions that were well describing the behavior of stock’s return. The chi-square and Anderson-Darling tests would be applied to assess a goodness-of-fit between historical time series of daily return and the possible probability distributions which were normal, Student-t, log-normal, logistic, triangular, Gumbel, Fréchet, Weibull, generalized beta, and generalized extreme value distributions. The tested results were found that the Gumbel distribution, extreme value distributions type-I, was well suit to describe the behavior of each stock’s returns. The method of maximum likelihood estimation was then employed to estimate parameters of the Gumbel distributions. In accordance with the variance-covariance matrix of both stocks, random samples from a multivariate normal distribution were then generated. The tail-independent Gaussian copula, which permits negative dependency and correlation matrix of the generated random samples were used to compute stock’s returns. Based on equally weighted average of all individual estimated stock’s returns held in the portfolio, the portfolio’s returns were recalculated in a number of 1,000 times. Then, the portfolio VaRs based on normality assumption and copula method were estimated in according with 95%, 97.5% and 99% levels of confidence respectively. We found that the Gaussian copula VaR was marginally lower than the normality VaR for all given levels of confidence respectively. This can be implied that the Gaussian copula VaR was not consistently aligned with the conservative portfolio investment where investing in low-risk securities is prioritized. Even though, the portfolio based on low-volatility stocks was formulated, the Gaussian copula VaR was not favorable for risk-averse investors to measure the worse loss depending on the current position.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The manuscript submitted for publication must be the original version, submitted only to this particular journal with no prior acceptance for publication elsewhere in other academic journals. The manuscript must also not violate the copyright issue by means of plagiarism.
References
Ang, A., & Chen, J. (2002). Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(3), 443-494.
Barreto, A. M. M., & Ishimura, N. (2022). Copula-based estimation of value at risk for the portfolio problem. In Proceedings of the Forum "Math-for-Industry" 2018, (pp. 1-13). Singapore: Springer.
Cherubini, U., & Luciano, E. (2001). Value at risk trade-off and capital allocation with copulas. Economic Notes, 30(2), 235-256.
Delignette-Muller, M. L., & Cornu, M. (2008). Quantitative risk assessment for escherichia coli O157:H7 in frozen ground beef patties consumed by young children in French households. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 128(1), 158–164.
Delignette-Muller, M. L., & Dutang, C. (2015). Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(4), 1-34.
Fortin, I., & Kuzmics, C. (2002). Tail dependence in stock return Pairs. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 11(2), 89-107.
Hofert, M., Kojadinovic, I., Maechler, M., & Yan. J. (2020). Copula: Multivariate dependence with copulas, R package version 1.0-1. Retrieved April 30, 2023, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=copula.
Hofert, M., & Mächler, M. (2011). Nested archimedean copulas meet R: The nacopula package. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(9), 1–20.
Ivan, K., & Jun, Y. (2010). Modeling multivariate distributions with continuous margins using the copula R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 34(9), 1–20.
Jun, Y. (2007). Enjoy the joy of copulas: With a package copula. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(4), 1–21.
Khanthavit, A. (2013). Copula and expected shortfall for measuring the risk level of fixed income portfolio. Journal of Business Administration, 30(113), 13 – 24.
Khruachalee, K., & Bodhisuwan, W. (2019). Applying copula in measuring portfolio value at risk. In The Proceedings of the 15th IMT-GT International Conference on Mathematics, Statistics, and their Applications (pp. 185-197). Indonesia: IPB University.
Khruachalee, K., & Bodhisuwan, W. (2021). Measuring of conditional value at risk portfolio using copula. ABAC Journal, 41(3), 130 – 154.
Laos Securities Exchange. (2024). Market data: Trading summary. Retrieved March 30, 2024, from http://www.lsx.com.la/market/trading/summary.do?lang=en.
Liebscher, E. (2008). Construction of asymmetric multivariate copulas. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 99(10), 2234–2250.
Longin, F., & Solnik, B. (2001). Extreme correlation of international equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 649-676.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
Nelsen, R. B. (1999). Introduction to copulas. New York: Springer Verlag.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://www.R-project.org/.
Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21, 49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1994.409501
Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43, 63-75.
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
Wang, Y. C., Lai, Y. H., & Wu, J. L. (2024). Asymmetries in risk spillovers between currency and stock markets: Evidence from the CoVaR-copula approach. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 63(3), 1083-1119.