ASEAN Centrality in the Era of Great Power Competition
Keywords:
ASEAN, ASEAN Centrality, Multipolarity, Great Power Competition, Small StatesAbstract
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was formed in 1967 with the Bangkok Conference as a bulwark against the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia. In its 57 years of existence ASEAN has proven to be a durable organization capable of organizational change. Furthermore, as the oldest and only standing regional organization with full membership of its region, or sub-region ASEAN has a large degree of credibility in international affairs. With the end of the Unipolar moment where the ‘West’ led by the United States exercised hegemony and beginning of a multipolar world ASEAN and its member states are entering into a new and dangerous period of great power competition. This holds both opportunities and perils similar in scope to the Cold War. This article will demonstrate using an historical and geopolitical approach that ASEAN will continue to play a pivotal and central role in East Asian international relations.
References
Abrams, E. (2022, March 4). The New Cold War. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/blog/new-cold-war-0.
Abuza, Z. (2020). America Should Be Realistic About its Alliance with Thailand - War on the Rocks. War on the Rocks. January 2. https://warontherocks.com/2020/01/america-should-be-realistic-about-its-alliance-with-thailand/.
Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution‐building: From the “ASEAN way” to the “Asia‐Pacific way”?. The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226.
Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia (1st ed.). Routledge.
Acharya, A. (2005). Do norms and identity matter? Community and power in Southeast Asia’s regional order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), pp.95–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500047199.
Acharya, A. (2018). Doomed by Dialogue: Will ASEAN Survive Great Power Rivalry in Asia? In G. Rozman & J. C. Liow (Eds.), International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier (pp. 77–91). Palgrave.
Acharya, A., Estevadeordal, A., & Goodman, L. W. (2023). Multipolar or multiplex? Interaction capacity, global cooperation and world order. International Affairs, 99(6), 2339–2365. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad242.
Alagappa, M. (1993). Regionalism and the quest for security: ASEAN and the Cambodian conflict. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 47(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719308445107.
Alimov, R. (2018). The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Its role and place in the development of Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.08.001.
Allison, L. (2015). The EU, ASEAN and interregionalism regionalism support and norm diffusion between the EU and ASEAN. Palgrave Macmillan.
Amador III, J. S. (2010). ASEAN in the Asia Pacific: Central or Peripheral? Asian Politics & Policy, 2(4), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-0787.2010.01217.x.
Asbach, O., & Schröder, P. (2014). The Thirty Years’ War - An introduction. In: O. Asbach and P. Schröder, eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to the Thirty Years’ War. New York: Routledge, pp.1–7.
ASEM. (2023). ASEM Summit. ASEM InfoBoard. Retrieved February 26, 2024, from https://aseminfoboard.org/overview/.
ASEAN. (1967). The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration). https://agreement.asean.org/media/download/20140117154159.pdf.
ASEAN. (1976). The Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, February 24, 1976. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20131230235433.pdf.
ASEAN. (2007). The ASEAN Charter. ASEAN; ASEAN. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf.
ASEAN. (2010). Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity. ASEAN Connectivity. https://connectivity.asean.org/resource/master-plan-on-asean-connectivity-2025/.
Ba, A. D. (2009). Regionalism’s multiple negotiations: ASEAN in East Asia. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104032.
Ba, A. D. (2017). ASEAN and the Changing Regional Order: The ARF, ADMM, and ADMM-Plus. In A. Baviera & L. Maranis (Eds.), Building ASEAN Community Political–Security and Socio-cultural Reflections ASEAN @ 50, volume 4 (pp. 146–157). Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Barbero, M. (2023). Europe Is Trying (and Failing) to Beat China at the Development Game. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/01/10/europe-china-eu-global-gateway-bri-economic-development/.
Beeson, M. (2002). Southeast Asia and the politics of vulnerability. Third World Quarterly, 23(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590220138321.
Beeson, M. (2003). Sovereignty under siege: Globalisation and the state in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000074637.
Beeson, M. (2005). Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative historical perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500270620.
Beeson, M. (2008). Institutions of the Asia-Pacific ASEAN, APEC, and beyond. Routledge.
Beeson, M. (2013). Living with Giants: ASEAN and the Evolution of Asian Regionalism. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2013.8.
Beeson, M. (2016). Can ASEAN Cope with China? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341603500101.
Beeson, M. (2022). Decentered? ASEAN’s Struggle to Accommodate Great Power Competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab044.
Blank, S. (2013). Making Sense of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14(2), 39–49.
Bonner, B. (2023). Rising tensions along the Indian-Chinese border. GIS Reports. August 8. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-india-border-2/.
Breuer, C. (2022). The New Cold War and the Return of History. Intereconomics, 2022(4), 202–203. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2022/number/4/article/the-new-cold-war-and-the-return-of-history.html.
Caballero-Anthony, M. (2014). Understanding ASEAN’s centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924227.
Caballero-Anthony, M. (2022). The ASEAN way and the changing security environment: navigating challenges to informality and centrality. International Politics, Online First.
Chen, I. T.-Y., & Yang, A. H. (2013). A harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory typologies of ASEAN countries’ strategies to the rise of China. The Pacific Review, 26(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2012.759260.
Choudhury, S. R. (2020). Here’s a list of the Australian exports hit by restrictions in China. CNBC. December 18. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/18/australia-china-trade-disputes-in-2020.html.
Collins, L., & Sobchak, F. (2023). U.S. Deterrence Failed in Ukraine. Foreign Policy. February 20. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/02/20/ukraine-deterrence-failed-putin-invasion/.
Detsch, J. (2022, June 17). Washington Worries China Is Winning Over Thailand. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/06/17/china-thailand-submarines-military-influence/.
Diesen, G. (2019). The Disorderly Transition to a Multipolar World. New Perspectives, 27(3), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825x1902700310.
Dung, P. X., & Vu, H. (2024). Vietnam-U.S. Security Cooperation Prospects under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. ISEAS Perspective, 2026(No. 10). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2024-10-vietnam-u-s-security-cooperation-prospects-under-the-comprehensive-strategic-partnership-by-phan-xuan-dung-and-hoai-vu/.
Epstein , K., & McCausland, P. (2024). Super Tuesday: Trump and Biden rematch looms as both win big. BBC News. March 6. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68486556.
Florick, D. (2021). Cambodia is China’s leverage point on ASEAN | East Asia Forum. December 14. https://eastasiaforum.org/2021/12/15/cambodia-is-chinas-leverage-point-on-asean/.
Gaens, B. (2008). Europe-Asia interregional relations : a decade of ASEM. Ashgate.
Gede, I., & Karim, M. F. (2023). How regional organisation survives: ASEAN, hedging and international society. Contemporary Politics, 29(5), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2216031.
Gerstl, A. (2022). Hedging Strategies in Southeast Asia. Routledge.
Goh, E. (2008). Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies. International Security, 32(3), 113–157.
Goh, N. (2021). Is Southeast Asia waking up to need for unity in South China Sea? South China Morning Post. April 19. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3129538/southeast-asia-waking-need-unity-south-china-sea.
Goldman, C. A. (1995). Managing Trade Policy Toward China Under Clinton: The Changing Role of Economics. In RAND Corporation (pp. 1–34). https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/drafts/2008/DRU928-1.pdf.
Green, M. A. (2023). China Is the Top Trading Partner to More Than 120 Countries | Wilson Center. Www.wilsoncenter.org. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/china-top-trading-partner-more-120-countries.
Grossman, D. (2017,). US Striking Just the Right Balance with Vietnam in South China Sea. The Diplomat. November 22. https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/us-striking-just-the-right-balance-with-vietnam-in-south-china-sea/.
Haacke, J. (2009). ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects. Routledge.
Hadano, T. (2020). Multipolarity and the Future of Multilateralism: Towards “Thick” Peacekeeping in the Donbas Conflict. Global Policy, 11(2), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12790.
Hameiri, S. & Jones, L. (2023). Why the West’s alternative to China’s international infrastructure financing is failing. European Journal of International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231218573.
Hammond, J. (2020, November 2). Vietnam ports may see increased U.S. Navy visits | Indo-Pacific Defense Forum. Indo-Pacific Defense Forum. https://ipdefenseforum.com/2020/11/vietnam-ports-may-see-increased-u-s-navy-visits/.
Ikenberry, J. G., & Mastanduno, M. (2003). International Relations Theory and the Search for Regional Stability. In J. G. Ikenberry & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1–22). Columbia University Press.
Jinping, X. (2013). Speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Indonesian Parliament---ASEAN---China Center. Asean-China-Center.org. http://www.asean-china-center.org/english/2013-10/03/c_133062675.htm.
Jones, L. (2007). ASEAN intervention in Cambodia: from Cold War to conditionality. The Pacific Review, 20(4), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740701672001.
Jones, L. (2010). Still in the “Drivers’ Seat”, but for how Long? ASEAN’s Capacity for Leadership in East-Asian International Relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341002900305.
Jones, L. (2011a). Beyond securitization: explaining the scope of security policy in Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), pp.403–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr002.
Jones, L. (2011b). State Power, Social Conflicts and Security Policy in Southeast Asia. In: R. Robison, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics . New York: Routledge, pp.346–360.
Jones, D. M., & Jenne, N. (2015). Weak states’ regionalism: ASEAN and the limits of security cooperation in Pacific Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 16(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcv015.
Jones, W. J., & Rhein, D. L. (2023, July 31). Bending with the Wind Again? Thailand’s Foreign Policy after the May Election. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia. https://kyotoreview.org/issue-35/thailands-foreign-policy-after-the-may-election/.
Kewalramani, M. (2024, February 7). India and China’s Volatile New Status Quo. FULCRUM. https://fulcrum.sg/india-and-chinas-volatile-new-status-quo/.
Kimball, J. (2021). Costs of the 20-year war on terror: $8 trillion and 900,000 deaths. Brown University; Brown University. September 1. https://www.brown.edu/news/2021-09-01/costsofwar.
Kittisilpa , J., & Lefevre, A. S. (2016). Thai-U.S. security ties still feel chill of 2014 coup. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0VI098/.
Krauthammer, C. (1990). THE UNIPOLAR MOMENT. The Washington Post. July 20. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1990/07/20/the-unipolar-moment/62867add-2fe9-493f-a0c9-4bfba1ec23bd/.
Kuik, C.-C. (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore´s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-2a.
Kuik, C.-C. (2021). Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review, 3(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.
Kurecic, P. (2017). Small States in the Multi-Polar World: Introduction. World Review of Political Economy, 8(3), 280. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.8.3.0280.
Liu, R. (2023). Reinforcing Wedging: Assessing China’s Southeast Asia Policy in the Context of Indo-Pacific Strategy. China Review, 23(1), 277–306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48717996.
Maizland, L. (2023). Why China-Taiwan Relations Are so Tense. Council on Foreign Relations. April 18. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-relations-tension-us-policy-biden.
Marston, H. S. (2024). Navigating great power competition: a neoclassical realist view of hedging. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 24(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcad001.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77–89.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press.
Ministry of External Affairs. (2017). India-Russia Relations. https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/India_Russia_May.pdf.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024). Internal document of an ASEAN Member State of ASEAN Foreign Ministers Retreat. 29 January.
Mohan, J. (1981). Why Vietnam Invaded Kampuchea. Economic and Political Weekly, 16(4), 121–125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4369465.
Morris, S. J. (1999). Why Vietnam invaded Cambodia : Political Culture and the Causes of War. Stanford University Press.
Mount, F. (1979). The Prussians of Southeast Asia. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 6(6), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.1979.10553988.
Mueller, L. M. (2021). Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and Hedging in Connectivity Governance—regional and National Pressure Points. The Pacific Review, 34(5), 747–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1757741.
Murray, P. (2008). Europe and Asia. Springer.
Narine, S. (1997). ASEAN and the ARF: The Limits of the ‘ASEAN Way’. Asian Survey, 37(10), pp.961–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2645616.
Narine, S. (1999). ASEAN into the twenty‐first century: Problems and prospects. The Pacific Review, 12(3), pp. 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749908719296.
Narine, S. (2024). Whether it’s Trump or Biden as president, U.S. foreign policy endangers the world. The Conversation. March 21. https://theconversation.com/whether-its-trump-or-biden-as-president-u-s-foreign-policy-endangers-the-world-225524.
Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2009). ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: from regional order to regional community? The Pacific Review, 22(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802651169.
Nischalke, T. (2002). Does ASEAN measure up? Post-Cold War diplomacy and the idea of regional community. The Pacific Review, 15(1), pp.89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740110110873.
O’Brien, A. (2005). The U.S.-Indonesian Military Relationship. Council on Foreign Relations. October 5. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-indonesian-military-relationship.
Ostergard, R. (2006). The Failure of America’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy: From the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Guinea. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/shjdir/v7n2/v7n2_05.pdf.
Phillips, C. (2022). The international system and the Syrian civil war. International Relations, 36(3), 004711782210979. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178221097908.
Rachman, J. (2023). US-Indonesia Security Relations Flourish in a Changing Indo-Pacific. The Diplomat. September 14. https://thediplomat.com/2023/09/us-indonesia-security-relations-flourish-in-a-changing-indo-pacific/.
Roberts, C. B. (2012). ASEAN Regionalism: Cooperation, Values and Institutionalization. Routledge.
Robles, A. C. (2007). The Asia-Europe Meeting. Routledge.
Saballa, J. (2023, May 29). US Refuses Thailand Request for F-35 Fighter Jets. The Defense Post. https://www.thedefensepost.com/2023/05/29/us-refuses-thailand-jets/#google_vignette.
Sacks, D. (2021). Europe’s Global Gateway Plans To Counter China, But Questions Remain. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/blog/europes-global-gateway-plans-counter-china-questions-remain.
Sang, H. T. (2022). Vietnam’s “Four No’s” of defence policy are being tested | Lowy Institute. April 22. Www.lowyinstitute.org. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/vietnam-s-four-no-s-defence-policy-are-being-tested.
Sanglee, T. (2022). Revisiting Thailand’s Involvement in the Cambodian Conflict. Thediplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2022/01/revisiting-thailands-involvement-in-the-cambodian-conflict/.
Schindler, S., Alami, I., DiCarlo, J., Jepson, N., Rolf, S., Cyuzuzo, L., DeBoom, M. J., Farahani, A. F., Liu, I. T., McNicol, H., Nock, P., Teri, G., Facundo, M., Ward, K., Zajontz, T., Zhao, Y., Bayırbağ, M. K., & Miao, J. T. (2023). The Second Cold War: US-China Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks. Geopolitics, Online First, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432.
Sebastian, L.C. and Lanti, I.G. (2010). Perceiving Indonesian Approaches to International Relations Theory. In: A. Acharya and B. Buzan , eds., Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia . New York: Routledge, pp.148–173.
Shalal, A. (2022, June 27). G7 aims to raise $600 billion to counter China’s Belt and Road. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/refile-us-aims-raise-200-bln-part-g7-rival-chinas-belt-road-2022-06-26/.
Shanghai Cooperation Organization. (2017). General information. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. https://eng.sectsco.org/20170109/192193.html.
Sheehan, M. (2022). Biden’s Unprecedented Semiconductor Bet. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. October 27. https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/10/27/biden-s-unprecedented-semiconductor-bet-pub-88270.
Shoji, T. (2018). Vietnam’s Security Cooperation with the United States: Historical Background, Present and Future Outlook. NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, 19. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/kiyo/pdf/2018/bulletin_e2018_2.pdf.
Simon, S. (2008). ASEAN and Multilateralism: The Long, Bumpy Road to Community. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 264–292. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-2e.
Simon, S. W. (1987). ASEAN’s Strategic Situation in the 1980s. Pacific Affairs, 60(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2758831.
Smith, S. (2002). The End of the Unipolar Moment? September 11 and the Future of World Order. International Relations, 16(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016002001.
Song, X. (2023,). A Decade of “Belt and Road” in China-Indonesia Cooperation. Kompas. October 4. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2023/10/04/en-satu-dekade-sabuk-dan-jalan-dalam-kerja-sama-china-indonesia.
Southgate, L. (2015). ASEAN and the Dynamics of Resistance to Sovereignty Violation: The Case of the Third Indochina War (1978–1991). Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 2(2), 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797015586128.
Stirling, J. (1980). ASEAN. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 7(5), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.1980.10553893.
Strangio, S. (2023). Thailand Will Replace Chinese Sub With Frigate, Defense Minister Says. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/10/thailand-will-replace-chinese-sub-with-frigate-defense-minister-says/.
Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA) Between United States-Singapore, United States-Singapore, 12 July, 2005. Retrieved from https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/95360.pdf.
Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to ‘global’ governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), pp.451–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802294713.
Stubbs, R. (2014). ASEAN’s leadership in East Asian region-building: strength in weakness. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924229.
Sutter, J. O. (1966). Two Faces of Konfrontasi: “Crush Malaysia” and the Gestapu. Asian Survey, 6(10), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642110.
Szalwinski, A. (2023). The Quad and Regional Security: U.S. Perspectives on the Future of Indo-Pacific Cooperation. The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-quad-and-regional-security-u-s-perspectives-on-the-future-of-indo-pacific-cooperation/.
Taiwan Relations Act, no. H.R.2479 (1979). https://www.congress.gov/bill/96th-congress/house-bill/2479/all-info#:~:text=Taiwan%20Relations%20Act%20%2D%20Declares%20it,other%20people%20of%20the%20Western.
The White House. (2023a). JOINT LEADERS’ STATEMENT: ELEVATING UNITED STATES-VIETNAM RELATIONS TO A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP. The White House. September 11. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/11/joint-leaders-statement-elevating-united-states-vietnam-relations-to-a-comprehensive-strategic-partnership/.
The White House. (2023b). FACT SHEET: Trilateral Australia-UK-US Partnership on Nuclear-Powered Submarines. The White House. March 13. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/13/fact-sheet-trilateral-australia-uk-us-partnership-on-nuclear-powered-submarines/#:~:text=Sale%20of%20U.S.%20Virginia%20Class.
Thompson, D. (2024). Don’t Make Us Choose Sides: Southeast Asian Perspectives of U.S. Strategy and Presence in the Region. National University of Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/cag/don't-make-us-choose-sides_march2024.pdf.
Townshend, A., Baruah, D. M., Corben, T., Herzinger, B., & Satake, T. (2023). Bolstering the Quad: The Case for a Collective Approach to Maritime Security. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/90350.
Turton, S. (2020). In Cambodia’s boomtown, a gamble on Chinese money goes sour. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-Spotlight/In-Cambodia-s-boomtown-a-gamble-on-Chinese-money-goes-sour.
Tzinieris, S., Chauhan, R., & Athanasiadou, E. (2023). India’s A La Carte Minilateralism: AUKUS and the Quad. The Washington Quarterly, 46(4), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660x.2023.2285540.
Paikin, Z. (2023). Multipolar Competition and the Rules-based Order: Probing the Limits of EU Foreign and Security Policy in the South China Sea. International Spectator, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2280598.
Parameswaran, P. (2023). What’s Behind the New China-ASEAN South China Sea Code of Conduct Talk Guidelines? | Wilson Center. Www.wilsoncenter.org. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/whats-behind-new-china-asean-south-china-sea-code-conduct-talk-guidelines.
Pettis, M. (2021). How Trump’s Tariffs Really Affected the U.S. Job Market. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. January 28. https://carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancialmarkets/83746.
Pham, L. (2019). Vietnam releases defense white paper, reaffirming no military alliance. Hanoi Times. November 26. https://hanoitimes.vn/vietnam-releases-defense-white-paper-reaffirming-no-military-alliance-300279.html.
Phillips, T., Holmes, O., & Bowcott, O. (2017). Beijing rejects tribunal’s ruling in South China Sea case. The Guardian. November 28. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china.
Poon-Kim, S. (1977). A Decade of ASEAN, 1967-1977. Asian Survey, 17(8), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.2307/2643336.
Putra, B. A. (2024). Brunei’s silent claims in the South China Sea: a case for the theory of trade expectations. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2317533.
Rahman, L. L. A., Perwita, A. A. B., Rishidianto, A., & Ardianasari, N. (2024). The Relevance of United States-Thailand Military Cooperation In 2010-2020. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 42(2), 642–648.
Rajghatta, C. (2024). India’s increased purchase of Russian oil is helping fuel Ukraine war: European think tank. The Times of India. February 19. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/indias-increased-purchase-of-russian-oil-is-helping-fuel-ukraine-war-european-think-tank/articleshow/107829601.cms.
Rasheed, Z. (2023). How an impasse in the South China Sea drove the Philippines closer to US. Al Jazeera. December 30. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/30/how-an-impasse-in-the-south-china-sea-drove-the-philippines-us-closer.
United Nations General Assembly. (1991). The Comprehensive Cambodian Peace Agreement (Paris Agreement). Resolution A/46/608, S/23177. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/KH_911023_FrameworkComprehensivePoliticalSettlementCambodia.pdf.
United States Department of State. (2017). U.S. Collective Defense Arrangements. 2009-2017.State.gov. https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/treaty/collectivedefense/.
United States Department of State. (2021). U.S. Relations With Brunei. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-brunei/.
United States Department of State. (2022). U.S. Security Cooperation With Thailand - United States Department of State. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-thailand/.
United States Embassy. (2023). United States and Indonesia Sign Defense Cooperation Arrangement. U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Indonesia. https://id.usembassy.gov/united-states-and-indonesia-sign-defense-cooperation-arrangement/.
Vu, K. (2023). Vietnam and China Announce Major Upgrade in Relations During Xi Visit. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/vietnam-and-china-announce-major-upgrade-in-relations-during-xi-visit/.
Wang, Y. (2021). Hedging Strategy: Concept, Behavior, and Implications for China-ASEAN Relations. East Asian Affairs, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557921500121
Wanyi, Z., & Mingjiang, L. (2023). China’s COVID-19 Vaccine Cooperation with Southeast Asia: A Boost for the Health Silk Road Initiative. East Asian Affairs, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557922500097.
Weissman, S. R. (2022). Covert Action, Congressional Inaction. Foreign Affairs. November 9. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/covert-action-congressional-inaction.
Wey, A. L. K. (2021). How “Konfrontasi” Reshaped Southeast Asian Regional Politics. Thediplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/how-konfrontasi-reshaped-southeast-asian-regional-politics/.
World Bank. (2021a). World Development Indicators. World Bank. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/.
World Bank. (2021b). Top Exporters and Importers by country and region 2021 | WITS Data. Wits.worldbank.org. https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/WLD/Year/2021/TradeFlow/EXPIMP.
Wu, C. C.-H. (2019). Why Do States Hedge in East Asia? An Empirical Study on Hedging. Asian Perspective, 43(3), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0017.
Yoshimatsu, H. (2012). ASEAN and evolving power relations in East Asia: strategies and constraints. Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2012.728030.
Yu, H. (2024). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Springer.
Yuzhu, W. (2021). Hedging Strategy: Concept, Behavior, and Implications for China-ASEAN Relations. East Asian Affairs, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557921500121.
Zachariah, N. A. (2024, February 28). RSAF to acquire eight F-35A fighter jets, growing its fleet to 20 F-35s. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/rsaf-to-acquire-eight-f-35a-fighter-jets-growing-its-fleet-to-20-f-35s.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 วารสารเอเชียตะวันออกและอาเซียนศึกษา

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ตีพิมพ์ได้ผ่านการพิจารณาจากผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ทัศนะและข้อคิดเห็นจาก บทความในวารสารเป็นของผู้เขียน ไม่ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของคณะผู้จัดทำและศูนย์การเมือง สังคม และอาณาบริเวณศึกษา การนำบทความในวารสารไปตีพิมพ์ซ้ำต้องได้รับอนุญาตจาก กองบรรณาธิการ