Development of English Grammar and Writing Skills Based on Participation in a Peer-assisted Learning Center

Main Article Content

Edward Devere Bacon


In an effort to address undergraduate students’ insufficient English writing skills in Thailand, this study incorporated a peer-assisted learning (PAL) center to develop their English grammar and writing skills. This mixed-method (both quantitative and qualitative), quasi-experimental study was done at an international college in Thailand, where the control and experimental groups consisted of 36 and 30 research participants respectively. An additional 30 participants functioned as student-peer mentors (SPMs), providing peer feedback to those students in the experimental group. From the research findings, it was concluded that integrating a PAL center as part of an English course’s curriculum can significantly improve student writing skills. However, the participants’ English grammar skills did not improve. With universities incorporating more and more academic projects or other courses of actions in order to augment student skills in various areas, PAL centers could be utilized to develop student writing skills. The research implications for this study provide a framework on how further studies might be built.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research Articles


Al-Mekhlafi, A., & Nagaratnam, R. (2011). Difficulties in teaching and learning grammar in an EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 62–92.

Alzahrani, I. (2016). The role of the constructivist learning theory and collaborative learning environment on wiki classroom and the relationship between them. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 10(3), 891–894. zenodo.1115335

Aprizawati, A., & Satria, A. (2016). The use of peer assisted learning to increase students’ writing ability.Inovish Journal, 1(1), 118-126. doi:10.35314/inovish.v1i1.20

Bennett, S., Morris, S., & Mirza, S. (2018). Medical students teaching medical students surgical skills: The benefits of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(6), 1471–1474.

British Council (n.d.). IELTS Task 2 writing band descriptors (public version). British Council. https://takeielts.

Bugaj, T., Blohm, M., Schmid, C., Koehl, N., Huber, J., Huhn, D., Herzog, W., Krautter, M., & Nikendei, C. (2019). Peer-assisted learning (PAL): skills lab tutors’ experiences and motivation. BMC Medical Education, 19, 353.

Çimer, A., & Coskun, S. (2018). Students’ opinions about their ninth grade Biology textbook: From the perspective of constructivist learning approach. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 201–214.

Collins, G., & Norris, J. (2017). Written language performance following embedded grammar instruction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 56(3), 16–30.

Farangi, M., Kamyab, J., Izanlu, M., & Ghodrat, N. (2017). The effect of using SMS as a post task activity on Iranian EFL learners' grammar knowledge. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 8(2), 392–403.

Foot, H., & Howe, C. (1998). The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 27–43). Routledge.

Hinkel, E. (2001). Giving personal examples and telling stories in academic essays. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 14–170.

Hopkins, D., & Cullen, P. (2006). Cambridge Grammar for IELTS. Cambridge University Press.

Jellison, J., Draper, E., & Brown, L. (2017). Learning together: The instinct to do good and peer-assisted strategies that work. Music Educators Journal, 104(2), 15–20. https://doi:10.1177/0027432117713823

Kaplan Publishing. (2016). IELTS premier with 8 practice tests. Kaplan Publishing.

Kunwongse, S. (2013). Peer feedback, benefits and drawbacks. Thammasat Review, 16(3), 277–288.

Loan, N. (2017). A case study of combined peer-teacher feedback on paragraph writing at a university in Thailand. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 253–262.

Looi, C., Wong, L., Glahn, C., & Cai, S. (2019). Seamless learning: Perspectives, challenges and opportunities. Springer Nature.

Maheady, L. (1998). Advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted learning strategies. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning (pp. 45–65). Routledge.

McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitation of peer-mediated instruction, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 5–25.

Moebius, L. (2015). Creating a peer-managed writing center for secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, United States). context=dissertations

Nuruzzaman, M., Islam, A., & Shuchi, I. (2018). An analysis of errors committed by Saudi Non-English major students in the English paragraph writing: A Study of Comparisons. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 31–39.

Oliverio, S. (2015). The need for “connectedness in growth”: Experience and education and the new technological culture. Education and Culture, 31(2), 55–68.

Pinion, C., & Hisel, J. (2019). Mentoring: What is your role? Journal of Environmental Health, 81(7), 32–34.

Puranik, C., Patchan, M., Lemons, C., & Al Otaiba, S. (2017). Using peer assisted strategies to teach early writing: results of a pilot study to examine feasibility and promise. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 25–50.

Rakhmawati, F., & Nirmalawati, W. (2017). Grammar teaching at pre-service training program in Kampung Inggris (a case study on mastering system program). Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 1(1), 7–14.

Roberts, E., Mills, D., & Stein, A. (2018). Dentists’ perceptions of their peer learning experiences in dental school and effects on practice. Journal of Dental Education, 82(11), 1185–1193. https://doi:10.21815/ JDE.018.123

Saeed, M., Ghazali, K., Sahuri, S., & Abdulrab, M. (2018). Engaging EFL learners in online peer feedback on writing: What does it tell us? Journal of Information Technology Education, 17, 39–61.

Schicker, J. (2018). Teaching writing and grammar through critical thinking in a genre-based upper-level undergraduate German class. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 51(1), 63–75.

Sevcikova, B. (2018). Online open-source writing aid as a pedagogical tool. English Language Teaching, 11(8), 126–142.

Sevenhuysen, S., Haines, T., Kiegaldie, D., & Molloy, E. (2016). Implementing collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Clinical Teacher, 13(5), 325–331. https://doi:10.1111/tct.12583

Tai, H., Lin, W., & Yang, S. (2015). Exploring the effects of peer review and teachers’ corrective feedback on EFL students’ online writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284–309. https://doi:10.1177/0735633115597490

Usman, R., & Jamil, B. (2019). Perceptions of undergraduate medical students about peer assisted learning. Professional Medical Journal, 26(8), 1283–1288. 26.08.3870

Usta, N., & Ayas, A. (2017). Worksheets enriched with computer-assisted activities based on the constructivist learning theory: An example of half-life and radioactive decay. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(35), 75–89.

Wang, C. (2011). Design of the model of constructivist learning theory for moral education in physical education teaching. International Education Studies, 4(3), 62–65.

Wong, L., & Looi, C. (2019). The conceptual niche of seamless learning: An invitation to dialogue. In C. Looi, L.

Wong, C. Glahn, & S. Cai (Eds.), Seamless learning: Perspectives, challenges and opportunities (pp. 3–27). Springer Nature.