Main Article Content
Seventh-day Adventist biblical scholars and theologians assert that Ellen G. White accepts and applies principles of biblical interpretation when she interprets Scripture. However, there seems to be a lack of academic research to support such a presupposition. One area that seems to be lacking is a comparison betweenWhite’s interpretations of gospelparables with those of modern biblical scholars. The interpretations of four scholars of selected synoptic gospel parables are compared and contrasted with those provided by White. It is shown that Whiteinterpreted selected parables in context using sound principles of biblical interpretation. She agrees with the interpretations of some non-Adventist scholars, and also provides additional insights.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
Blomberg, C. (2012). Interpreting the parables. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
Hultgren, A. (2000). The parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Kistemaker, S. (1987). The parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Pfandl, G. (2005), Ellen G. White and Hermeneutics. In R. W. George (Ed.), Understanding scripture: an Adventist approach. Silver Spring, MD: Review and Herald Publishing Association (pp. 309–326). Retrieved from https://epdf.pub/understanding-scripture-an-adventist-approach.html
Snodgrass, K. (2008). Stories with intent: A comprehensive guide to the parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
White, E. G. (1911). The great controversy between Christ and Satan. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press Publishing Association.
White, E. G. (2002a). Testimonies for the church (Volume 5). Nampa, ID: Pacific Press Publishing Association.
White, E. G. (2002b). Christ's object lessons. Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald Publishing Association.