Title Five Dimensions of Community Capital: A Framework for Grassroots Economic Empowerment
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study, entitled “Community Capital Management for Strengthening Local Fisheries in Ban Chom Phra through Participatory Processes,” investigates how community-based management of local resources can enhance sustainable livelihoods. The research advances the analytical framework of the five dimensions of community capital—human, social, cultural, natural, and economic capital—as a strategic mechanism for developing local occupations and community enterprises in Ban Chom Phra, Bueng Bun Subdistrict, Bueng Bun District, Sisaket Province. The objectives are: (1) to examine the existing conditions of community capital in the local fishery sector of Ban Chom Phra, (2) to explore participatory community-based management strategies for strengthening sustainable local occupations, and (3) to propose pathways for developing self-reliant community enterprises through inclusive participation.
Employing a qualitative research methodology, data were collected from 30 volunteer participants through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and focus group discussions with community leaders and members of local occupational groups.
Findings reveal that a fundamental challenge in the study area lies in the community’s limited understanding of community capital as an integrated system. Although the community possesses diverse cultural, social, economic, and ecological resources, local perceptions tend to emphasize only tangible assets such as income or marketable products. In contrast, human capital, social networks, cultural heritage, and environmental capital are often overlooked, resulting in underutilization of existing capacities and unequal access to communal benefits.
Through in-depth qualitative inquiry, the study identifies that this conceptual gap constitutes both the root cause and a major barrier to sustainable development, as it prevents the community from leveraging its assets to create value addition or long-term collective welfare. Consequently, the research emphasizes knowledge management processes aimed at building a shared understanding of the five forms of capital. This is achieved through interactive community forums, collaborative analysis, and lesson-learning workshops, leading to the development of a participatory community capital management model. The model provides practical guidance for planning, resource governance, and grassroots economic development aligned with local contexts.
The study concludes that enhanced awareness of community capital enables Ban Chom Phra residents to integrate the five dimensions of capital into a coherent framework for action. This integration strengthens local resource governance, reduces internal inequalities, and lays a foundation for long-term development consistent with principles of grassroots economics and sustainable development.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.
References
โดม กองพล (นามสมมุติ). (2567, 15 กุมภาพันธ์). สัมภาษณ์ ณ ศาลาริมห้วยทับทัน บ้านจอมพระ ตำบลบึงบูรพ์ จังหวัดศรีสะเกษ.
ใบ ใจสบาย (นามสมมุติ). (2567, 15 กุมภาพันธ์). สัมภาษณ์ ณ ศาลาริมห้วยทับทัน บ้านจอมพระ ตำบลบึงบูรพ์ จังหวัดศรีสะเกษ.
ประมวล เกิดจอมพระ (นามสมมุติ). (2567, 15 กุมภาพันธ์). สัมภาษณ์ ณ ศาลาริมห้วยทับทัน บ้านจอมพระ ตำบลบึงบูรพ์ จังหวัดศรีสะเกษ.
อุดร เกียรติจอมพระ (นามสมมุติ). (2567, 15 กุมภาพันธ์). สัมภาษณ์ ณ ศาลาริมห้วยทับทัน บ้านจอมพระ ตำบลบึงบูรพ์ จังหวัดศรีสะเกษ.
สายไหม โตจอมพระ (นามสมมุติ). (2567, 15 กุมภาพันธ์). สัมภาษณ์ ณ ศาลาริมห้วยทับทัน บ้านจอมพระ ตำบลบึงบูรพ์ จังหวัดศรีสะเกษ.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10001-8
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper No. 296). Institute of Development Studies.
Flora, C. B., & Bregendahl, C. (2012). Collaborative community-supported agriculture: Balancing community capitals for producers and consumers. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(3), 329–346.
Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (2004). Rural communities: Legacy and change (2nd ed.). Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494697
Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (2008). Rural Communities: Legacy and Change (3rd ed.). Westview Press.
Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (2013). Rural communities: Legacy and change (5th ed.). Westview Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper No. 72). Institute of Development Studies.
Serrat, O. (2017). The sustainable livelihoods approach. In Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance (pp. 21–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5