Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Kesan Strategi Kepimpinan Terhadap Kecemerlangan Sekolah Diperantarakan oleh Atribut Pengetua Berkesan di Selatan Thailand

Main Article Content

Farid Abdullahhasan, 6852279
Siti Salwa Mohd. Noor, 6852279

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk untuk menentukan sebuah model yang menunjukkan hubungan strategi kepimpinan SK, terhadap kecemerlangan sekolah KS, dan atribut pengetua berkesan APB, sebagai mediator, menggunakan kaedah structural equation modeling SEM. sebagai hubungan antara model kajian. Kajian tinjauan ini merupakan kajian inferensi dengan menggunakan data-data kuantitatif. Seramai 310 orang sebagai responden daripada pengetua sekolah, meliputi lima wilayah selatan Thailand, dipilih melalui teknik Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).  dan penganalisisan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan statistik inferensi program AMOS, Hasil dapatannya; kajian menguji model hubungan structural equation modeling SEM antara faktor. Konstruk atribut pengetua berkesan APB, sebagai mediation antara konstruk strategi kepimpinan SK, terhadap konstruk kecemerlangan sekolah KS, kesan hubungan direct effect, indirect effect, dan total effect didapati model pengaruh hubungan yang positif dan signifikan. Dengan umumnya, implikasi penting terhadap kepimpinan bagi pengetua dalam tindakan amalan operasi yang kecekapan dan keberkesanan untuk kecemerlangan sekolah yang berkualiti.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abdullahhasan, F., & Mohd. Noor, S. S. (2019). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Kesan Strategi Kepimpinan Terhadap Kecemerlangan Sekolah Diperantarakan oleh Atribut Pengetua Berkesan di Selatan Thailand. Al-HIKMAH Journal, 9(18), 175–195. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HIKMAH/article/view/238566
Section
Research Article

References

Adair, J. (2002). Effective strategic leadership. London: Macmillan.
Baldrige National Quality Program. (2007). Criteria for Performance Excellence. [online], Available from : http:// www.baldrige.nist.gov. 2009, October 11. Blog-post_41.html. 5 February 2015.
Carmines ,E.G. and Mclver,J.P. 1983. Antroduction of the analysis of models with unobserved Variables, Political Methodology, 9(1),51-102.
Chawengsak Preuksatewed. (2010). Development of Strategic Leadership Indicators ofo Educational Service Area Office Directors, Ministry of Education, Ph.D. Thesis. Khon Kaen University.
Dess,G.and Miller, A. (1993). Strategic Formulation and Management Action. 2nd ed. New. York : McGraw-Hill Book.
Ding, L., Velicer, W.F., & Harlow, L.L. 1995. Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2), 119-143.
Dubrin, J.A. (1998). Leadership Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. Boston, MA. Thesis. Houghton. Mifflin.
Fair, Richard W. (2001). A study of New Jersey public school superintendents’ perceptions regarding the behavioral characteristics of effective elementary school principle. Ed.D. Seton Hall University.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top execultives and their effects on organizations. St. Pual, MN: West.
Gaithersburg. (2008). Baldridge national quality program educational criteria for performance excellence. National quality of standard and technology.
Gill, Roger. (2006). Theory and Pratice of Leadership. California : Sege Publication Ltd.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1995). The motivation to work. (2nd ed.). New York: Wesley.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Management of strategy: Concept and Cases. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (2001). Educational Administration, Theory, Research and Practices. 6th Edition, Mcgraw Hall, New York.
Jumrern Jitlung, 2007. A Linear Structural Equation Model of Knowledge Management Factors Affecting Learning Organizations in Schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission in Southern Provinces, Dissertation, Prince of Songkla Universiti.
Kachaporn Sermsri and Wallapha Ariratana. (2014). Strategic Leadership of School Administrators Affecting Schools Affectiveness Under the Office of Nongbualamphu Primary Educational Service Area 1. Journal of Education, 37(4), 25-33.
Kementerian Pendidikan. (1997). Perlembagaan Kerajaan Thailand, 1997. Bangkok: Cetakan Karn Sasena.
Luan & Angkana Saiyot. (1999). Pengukuran sampingan moral. Bangkok: Suviriyasan.
Miskel Cecil, David McDonald and Susan Bloom. (1983). “Structural and Expectiancy Linkage within Schools and Organizational Effectiveness” Educational Administration Quarterly. 19 (1): 49-82.
Nawarat Santikul. (2003). Perspectives of subordinates towards supervisors'' leadership dimensions and subordinates'' job satisfaction, case study : the office of the securities and exchange commission. M.A. Thesis, Srinakharinwirot University.
Netpanna Yawirach. (2007). Pemimpin dan Strategi Kepimpinan. Cetak, 5. Bangkok: Sentral Express.
Norlia Goolamally & Jamil Ahmad. Atribut Pemimpin Sekolah Ke Arah Kelestarian Kepimpinan: Satua Kajian Delphi. Pembentanga kertas kerja dalam seminar pendidikan serantau. Tahun 2011. FKIP Universitas Riau, Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.
Parleewan Sittikarn. (2014). The Model of Excellent Project Management of Schools under the Jurisdiction of Primary Educational Service Office Areas in Southern Provinces of Thailand, Thesis, Ph.D. Prince of Songkla University.
Pejabat Suruhanjaya Pendidikan Asas. (2010). Cara operasi sekolah standard antarabangsa. Bangkok: Chumnum Sahakhon Karnkaset, Thailand. Ltd.
Rangsan Prasertsri. (2006). Pengurusan moden. Bangkok: Tarmmasanr.
Rattaya Wonghirakoon. (2015). Development Guidelines to Reach Excellence School of Banpongdaeng Schools, Tak Primary Educational Service Area Office1. M.Ed. Master, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University.
Robbins, S. P., & Jude T. (2007). Organization Behavior. (13t h ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Robert Tannenbaum and others. (1961). Leadership and Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, Boo Company.
Rungnirun Putthisen & Thanomwan Prasertcharoensuk. (2014). faktor analisis strategi kepimpinan bagi pengetua sekolah yang memberi kesanan kepada sekolah, wilayah Maha Sarakham, area 3. Journal of Education, 37(4) October-December 2014, 122-130.
Samit Sachanukorn. (2005). Teknik dalam perkhidmatan. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Snok Tiyaw. (2000). Prinsip Pengurusan. Bangkok: Percetakan Thammasat University.
Somyok Nawikarn. (2001). Pengurusan untuk kecemerlangan. E, 2. Bangkok: Barnnakit.
Songpol Charoenkham. (2009). The Model of Excellence Schools Under Bangkok Metropolitan Adminstration, Thesis, Ph.D. Silpakorn University.
Spring, (2008). Anugerah kualiti bagi Negara Singapore (The Singapore Quality Award). [online], accessed 13 January 2008. Avalible from: http://spring.gov. sq/portal/product/awards/sqa.
Sunant Sadchaisomboon. (2013). Atribut pengetua berkesan bagi pengetua sekolah mengikut pandangan guru dan lembaga pengarah pendidikan asas, satu kajian pendidikan rendah bagi wilayah Singburi. M.A. Tesis Universiti Rajabahat Thep Sateri.
Supanee Saridwanich. (2010). Pengurusan Strategi: Konsep dan Teori. Bangkok: Se-ed book Center.
Suthep Ponagsriwat. (2005). Kepimpinan. Bangkok: S.Asiapress.
Tee, N.P. (2003). “The Singapore School and the School Excellence Model”. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2, 27-39.
Udom Chooleewan. (2016). Development Model of Quality Management System for Secondary Schools toward of World – Class Standard Schools, Thesis, Ph.D. Prince of Songkla University.
Yukl, G.A. (2000). Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.