ประเมินผลนโยบายสาธารณะถ้าไม่สำเร็จก็เท่ากับล้มเหลว? : Public Policy Evaluation if Unsuccessful, it Fails?
Keywords:
Evaluation Theories, Success and Failure evaluation, Public Policy AssessmentAbstract
This article aims to present public policy evaluation theories problems first is how to deal with ontology dilemma problem, need to choose only between subjective or objective? Second Does the evaluation public policy result if its unsuccessful means it fails? The data obtained from academic paper reference. The results showed Multi Dimensions model and Grey Areas in Between approach from Allan McConnell that add political factor which accept subjective values and redefined meaning of successful and failure by shading the degree are properly to solve the problem and make it a step to develop public policy evaluation theories. Avail use to analyze and understand the complicated of public policy nowadays.
References
Bovens, Mark, Paul t’Hart and B. Guys Peters (eds). (2001). Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bovens, Mark and Paul t’Hart. (2016). Revisiting the Study of Policy Failures. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 653-666.
Boyne, G.A. (2003). What is Public Sector Improvement? Public Administration. Vol. 81, No. 2. pp. 211-227.
Donaldson, Stewart I. and Mark W. Lipsey. (2006). Roles for Theory in Contemporary Evaluation Practice: Developing Practical Knowledge. in Ian F. Shaw, Jenifer C. Greene and Melvin M. Mark ed. Handbook of Evaluation: Policies, Program and Practices. London: Sage.
Donna H. Kerr. (1976). The Logic of Policy and Successful Policies. Policy Sciences. September 1976, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp. 351-363.
Gore, Tony. (2011). Review Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. People, Place & Policy Online (2011): 5/1, pp. 46-49.
Marsh, David and Allan McConnell. (2010). Towards a Framework for Establishing Policy Success. Public Administration. Vol. 88, No.2, 2010 (564-583)
McConnell, Allan. (2010)a. Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy. Vol. 30., 3, pp. 345-262.
McConnell, Allan. (2010)b. Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmilan,
Rossi Peter H, Mark W. Lipsey and Howard E. Freeman. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th edition. California: Sage.
Stame, Nicoletta. (2004). Theory-Based Evaluation and Type of Complexity. Evaluation. Vol 10 (1). pp. 58-76.
Bovens, Mark and Paul t’Hart. (2016). Revisiting the Study of Policy Failures. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 653-666.
Boyne, G.A. (2003). What is Public Sector Improvement? Public Administration. Vol. 81, No. 2. pp. 211-227.
Donaldson, Stewart I. and Mark W. Lipsey. (2006). Roles for Theory in Contemporary Evaluation Practice: Developing Practical Knowledge. in Ian F. Shaw, Jenifer C. Greene and Melvin M. Mark ed. Handbook of Evaluation: Policies, Program and Practices. London: Sage.
Donna H. Kerr. (1976). The Logic of Policy and Successful Policies. Policy Sciences. September 1976, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp. 351-363.
Gore, Tony. (2011). Review Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. People, Place & Policy Online (2011): 5/1, pp. 46-49.
Marsh, David and Allan McConnell. (2010). Towards a Framework for Establishing Policy Success. Public Administration. Vol. 88, No.2, 2010 (564-583)
McConnell, Allan. (2010)a. Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy. Vol. 30., 3, pp. 345-262.
McConnell, Allan. (2010)b. Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmilan,
Rossi Peter H, Mark W. Lipsey and Howard E. Freeman. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th edition. California: Sage.
Stame, Nicoletta. (2004). Theory-Based Evaluation and Type of Complexity. Evaluation. Vol 10 (1). pp. 58-76.
Downloads
Published
2019-12-21
How to Cite
คล่องดำเนินกิจ ศ. (2019). ประเมินผลนโยบายสาธารณะถ้าไม่สำเร็จก็เท่ากับล้มเหลว? : Public Policy Evaluation if Unsuccessful, it Fails?. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUSOKKU), 36(3), 141–166. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSO/article/view/198676
Issue
Section
บทความวิจัย
