Theory of Asymmetric Conflict: Consideration on Its Strategies and Outcomes

Authors

  • Parinya Nounpian

Keywords:

Asymmetric Conflict, Strategy, Outcome, Negotiation

Abstract

This article aims to explain theory of asymmetric conflict which bases on the unequal power relationship between the stronger and the weaker. Each side has exercised different objectives and strategies. This theory usually focuses on zero-sum outcome. Furthermore, the article adds the perspective of theory of negotiation that provides the area for third party to participate more in the conflicts. Also, this theory clarifies the role of third party in the asymmetric conflict management.

References

Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Harper Collins.

Alfredson, T. & Cungu, A. (2008, January). Negotiation Theory and Practice: A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/550/4-5_negotiation_background_paper_179en.pdf

Arreguin-Toft, I. (2001, Summer). How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict. International Security, 26 (1), 93 – 128.

Arreguín-Toft, I. (2005). How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brading, K. & Castellani, E. (2003). Introduction. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani

(Eds). (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gallo, G., & Marzano, A. (2009). The Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian Case. Journal of Conflict Studies, 29.

Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/article/view/15231

Jeong, H.W. (2010). Conflict Management and Resolution: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

Mack, A., Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics, 27, 175 – 200.

Pfetsch, F. R. & Landau, A. (2000). Symmetry and Asymmetry in International Negotiations. International Negotiation, 5, 21 – 42.

Retrieved from https://eduedi.dongguk.edu/files/20070519075040624.pdf

Schif, A. (2012). The Israeli-Palestinian Oslo Process: A Prenegotiation Perspective. Peace and Conflict Studies, 19 (1), 60 – 92.

Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol19/iss1/3

Smolin, L. (2006). The Trouble with Physics. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Stepanova, E. (2008). Terrorism in Asymmetric conflict: Ideological and Structural Aspects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Womack, B. (2004, May). Asymmetry Theory and China’s Concept of Multipolarity. Journal of Contemporary China, 13 (39), 351 – 366.

Womack, B. (2006). China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zartman, I.W. (2008). Negotiation and Conflict Management: Essays on Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Zartman, I.W. & Faure, G.O. Eds. (2005). Escalation and Negotiation in International Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ

Downloads

Published

2022-02-04

How to Cite

Nounpian, P. (2022). Theory of Asymmetric Conflict: Consideration on Its Strategies and Outcomes. Political Science Critique, 7(13), 1–15. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PSC/article/view/254505

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 13 (2020): January - June

Section

Research Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.

All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.