The four-dimensional theses for one fundamental synthesis: Lacan’s subject as the subject of resistance
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This article aims to explore Jacques Lacan’s idea of the subject, which is sporadic in his writings and teachings. It argues that Lacan’s subject is and will always be the subject of resistance. To understand the nature of the Lacanian subject, this inquiry focuses on four fundamental theses: (1) mirror-stage, (2) negation, (3) trauma, and (4) woman. The article takes on a philosophical task in this regard. The synthesis of all the theses suggests that Lacan’s subject is the subject of resistance. This type of subject is preoccupied with agility, movement, speech, and action, which nurtures a dissonance from the consecutive consonance posited by the Other. Its presence marks the logic of disruptive ego-consciousness. Lacan compels everyone to negate ego-consciousness as a true locus of the subject. This marks a flamboyant declaration of independence of Lacan’s disjunctive synthesis about the subject as a revolutionary subject. It is unlike the conceptualisation of the subject that is consistently envisioned in a psychoanalytic community under the dominance of scientific behaviouralists such as Erik Erikson’s focus on ego identity and Carl Jung’s optimism of the unity of consciousness and the unconscious of the subject.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.
All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.
References
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore and Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Edkins, J. (2019). Routledge Handbook of Critical International Relations. New York and Oxon: Routledge.
Erikson, E. (1960). Identity and the Life Cycle. London and New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Haines, S. (2019). The Politics of Trauma: Somatics, Healing, and Social Justice. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2014). Science of Logic (Miller, A., Trans.). London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Jayanama, S. (2022). Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Global Politics but Were Afraid to Ask Lacan (Kwangthong, P., Trans.). Siam Publishing House.
Jung, C. (2002). The Undiscovered Self: The Dilemma of the Individual in Modern Society. London and New York: Routledge.
Lacan, J. (1999). Encore: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XX (Fink,B, Trans.). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2006a). The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience. In Fink, B., Fink, H. & Grigg, R. (Ed. & Trans.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp.75-81). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2006b). Aggressiveness in Psychoanalysis. In Fink, B., Fink, H. & Grigg, R. (Ed. & Trans.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp.82-101). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2006c). A Theoretical Introduction to the Functions of Psychoanalysis in Criminology. In Fink, B., Fink, H. & Grigg, R. (Ed. & Trans.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp.102-122). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2006d). Presentation on Psychical Causality. In Fink, B., Fink, H. & Grigg, R. (Ed. & Trans.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp.123-160). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2006e). The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. In Fink, B., Fink, H. & Grigg, R. (Ed. & Trans.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp.197-268). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2007). The Other Side of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XVII (Grigg,R, Trans.). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Leupin, A. (1991). Lacan & the Human Sciences. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Miller, J. A. (Ed.). (1998). Encore: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XX (Fink, B., Trans.). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Moncayo, R. & Romanowicz, M. (2018). The Real Jouissance of Uncountable Numbers. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Nobus, D. (2022). Critique of Psychoanalytic Reason: Studies in Lacanian Theory and Practice. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Shepherdson, C. (2003). Lacan and Philosophy. In Rabaté, J. M. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Lacan (pp.116-152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarabochia, AS. (2014). Lacking Subjects and the Subject of Lack: Basaglia and Lacan. In Chiesa, L. (Ed.), Lacan and Philosophy: The New Generation (pp.221-238). Melbourne: Re.Press.
Themi, T. (2014). Lacan’s Ethics and Nietzsche’s Critique of Platonism. Albany: SUNY Press.
Watson, J. (2011). Guattari's Diagrammatic Thought: Writing Between Lacan and Deleuze. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Zupančič, A. (2020). Ontology and the Death Drive: Lacan and Deleuze. In Sbriglia, R. & Žižek, S. (Eds.), Subject Lessons: Hegel, Lacan, and the Future of Materialism (pp.142-170). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.