A Comparative Study: Lessons and Solutions for Developing Knowledge Regarding the 21st Century Bureaucracy
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This article aims to present a study using comparative methods to create knowledge about the 21st-century bureaucracy, which is facing the problem of fragmented knowledge from efforts to develop theories suitable for the complex, diverse, and dynamic environments of each society today. This complexity makes it challenging to understand and apply such knowledge practically, potentially leading to the decline of the discipline similar to the field of public administration in the past. Therefore, this article proposes a solution by using a comparative study approach to create models of relationships between social contexts and practices in the form of conditions, which will lead to the connection, organization, and integration of fragmented knowledge into a unified whole.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.
All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.
References
Balutis, A. P. (1973). “Normative Aspects of Comparative Administration.” Journal of Comparative Administration, 5(1): 3-13.
Bendor, J. (1976). “A Theoretical Problem in Comparative Administration.” Public Administration Review, 36(6): 626-631.
Bowornwathana, B. (2008). Importing governance into the Thai policy: Competing hybrids and reform consequences. In Bowornwathana, B.& Wescott, C. (Eds.), Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust (pp.5-20). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Bowornwathana, B. (2012). ratthaprasāsanasāt : thritsadī læ nǣo kānsưksā ( khō̜ . sō̜ . nưngphanpǣtrō̜ipǣtsipčhet - khō̜ . sō̜ . nưngphankāorō̜ičhetsip)sipčhet edition. [Public Administration: Theory and Study (1887-1970)17th edition] Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing.
Bowornwathana, B., & Wescott, C. (Eds.). (2008). Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2022). “Comparative bureaucratic politics.” Annual Review of Political Science, 25: 43-63.
Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering.” Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.
Dimitrova, A. L. (2020). “Grand challenges in studying comparative governance.” Frontiers in Political Science, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00003.
Fitzpatrick, J., Goggin, M., Heikkila, T., Klingner, D., Machado, J., & Martell, C. (2011). “A new look at comparative public administration: Trends in research and an agenda for the future.” Public Administration Review, 71(6): 821–830.
Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Macmillan.
Heady, F. (1978). “Comparative Administration: A Sojourner’s Outlook.” Public Administration Review, 38(4): 358-365.
Heady, F. (2001). Public administration: Comparative perspective. Marcel Dekker Inc.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? In Shafritz, J. M. & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.), Classics of public administration 5th edition. (pp.503-516) USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Jirarungruangwong, S. (2021). “Generating people’s participation and accountability of the government in Thailand: cultural impact of power distance.” Journal of East Asian and ASEAN Studies, 21(1): 1-22.
Jirarungruangwong, S. (2023). “Introducing the Study of Bureaucratic Reform by Comparing Problems and Solutions: Example of Government and Governance.” Political Science Critique, 10(1): 1-22.
Kennedy, S. S. (2013). “Context matters: Pedagogy and comparative public administration.” Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 13(1): 161–174.
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). “AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings.” Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976.
Loveman, B. (1976). “The Comparative Administration Group, Development and Antidevelopment.” Public Administration Review, 36(6): 616-621.
Newton, K., & Van Deth, J. W. (2010). Foundations of comparative politics: Democracies of the modern world (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press.
Nyadera, I. N., Onnder, M. & Islam, Md. N. (2022). Palgrave Handbook of Comparative Public Administration: Concepts and Cases. Palgrave Macmilan.
Önder, M. & Nyadera, I. N. (2020). Comparative administrative cultures between developed and developing countries. In Farazmand, A. (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp.1-6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3902-1
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Penguin Press.
Ostrom, V. (2008). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University of Alabama Press.
Peters, B. G., & Savoie, D. J. (1995). Governance in a changing environment (Vol. 2). McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo–Weberian State 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. J. P. s. (1996). “The new governance: governing without government.” Political Studies, 44(4): 652-667.
Riggs, F. W. (1969). “Bureaucratic Politics in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Comparative Administration, 1(1): 1-38.
Rosenau, J. N. (2021). Governance in the Twenty-first Century. In Mills, K. & Stiles, K. (Eds.), Understanding Global Cooperation (pp. 16-47). Brill.
Smith, P. K. (2000). Philosophy of Science and Its relevance for the Social Science. In Burton, D., Research Training for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
Springer, J. F. (1976) “Empirical Theory and Development Administration: Prologues and Promise” Public Administration Review, 36(6): 636-641.
Thornton, S. (1997). Karl popper. Retrieved April 19, 2024, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/
Weber, M. (1922). Bureaucracy. In Shafritz, J. M. & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.), Classics of public administration 5th edition. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
White, L. D. (1926). Introduction to the study of public administration. Macmillan.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. In Shafritz, J. M. & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.), Classics of public administration 5th edition. (pp.22-34) USA: Thomson Wadsworth.