Democracy and Deliberation: A Case Study of Deliberation on the 2017 Constitution Drafting Process
คำสำคัญ:
Deliberative Democracy, Thai Democracy, Constitution, Deliberation, Issue Bookบทคัดย่อ
This research focuses on studying concepts and formats of deliberative democracy in various aspects, particularly in terms of processes that would be suitable for developing a culture of deep listening and results-based deliberation. In conducting this research, both qualitative and participatory methodologies were employed to experiment with the usefulness of deliberative dialogue in clarifying specific conflicted issues from the draft constitution. The findings of this research are as follows: 1) in the contextual aspect regarding problems of Thai democracy, it was found that a constitution, both in its content and drafting process, as well as political power relations, reflects the issues of democratic values and protracted social conflict in Thailand, and 2) in the process context, it was found that the utilization of an “issue book” is the key instrument in the deliberative dialogue process.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Chotsakulrat, P. (2007). sư̄sān yāng santi : khūmư̄ kānsư̄sān phư̄a sāng khwāmkhaočhai læ kǣkhai khwāmkhatyǣng yāng sāngsan. [Nonviolent Communication: A Communication Guide to Creating Understanding and Resolving Conflict Creatively] Bangkok: Semsikhalai.
Einsiedel, E. F., & Eastlick, D. L. (2000). Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy: A Communications Perspective. Science Communication, 21(4), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547000021004001
Fishkin, J. S., et al. (2000). Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliamentary affairs, 53(4), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/53.4.657
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jiawiwatkul, U. (2010). kānwičhai chœ̄ng patibatkān yāng mī sō̜ won rūam : nǣokhit lakkān læ botrīan. [Participatory action research: concepts, principles and lessons learned] Nakhon Pathom: Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University.
Jumnianpol, S. (2009). kānmư̄ang khō̜ng prachāthipatai bǣp prưksā hārư̄ nai krabūankān phatthanā : sưksā kō̜ranī kānčhatkān nam nai čhangwat Rayō̜ng. [Politics of Deliberative Democracy in Development Process: The Case Study of Water Management in Rayong Province] (Doctoral Thesis) Chulalongkorn University https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/56678
Kamateri, E. et al. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Tools and Technologies for Policy Making. In M. Janssen, M. Wimmer, & A. Deljoo (Eds.), Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research (pp. 125-156). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_7
Kongkirati, P. (2019). prachāthipatai : lāk khwāmmāi lāi rūpbǣp. [Democracy: Meanings and Forms] (2nd ed.) Bangkok: Siamparitut.
Lederach, J. P. (2012). phalang tham hǣng čhintanākān : sin læ winyān kānsāng santiphāp. [The Moral Imagination : The Art and Soul of Building Peace] (S. Khantiworapong, Trans., G. Arya, Ed.) Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.
Phlainoi, N. et al. (2008). khrư̄angmư̄ thāng sangkhom phư̄a kānrīanrū nai bō̜ribot plīan phān: chut khwāmrū khapkhlư̄an praden sāthārana (Issue Book). [Social tools for learning in transitional contexts: A knowledge kit for driving public issues (Issue Book)] Nakhon Pathom: Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University.
Pindavanija, E., et al. (2017). Social Healing Factors and Process that Lead to Reconciliation and Forgiveness: The Studies of Thailand Socio-political Violence Conflict over a Decade. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Thai Studies "Globalized Thailand?" Connectivity, Conflict, and Conundrums of Thai Studies, (pp. 1220-1237).
Smith, G., & Wales, C. (2000). Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, 48(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00250
Wisutthatham, S. (2012, September 1). “èut : héut : fang” way-tee săn-dtì bprà-chaa-típ-bpà-dtai dan săng-kom klêuuan dtuua yàang ‘hĕn dtàang’. [“Tolerance : Resilience : Listening” A Democratic Peace Platform Driving Social Transformation Through ‘Respectful Disagreement’. Isranews Agency. https://www.isranews.org/content-page/item/16044-2012-08-29-10-56-25.html
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 รัฐศาสตร์พิจาร
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.
All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.
