Art as living heritage: An art-based participatory learning model for sustaining traditional wooden boat-building knowledge in

Main Article Content

Sasikan Srisopon
Parisa Musigakama
Aamaal Phakdeetham Chimvilaisup

Abstract

This article presents findings from a broader research project that sought to develop a participatory art-based learning process for understanding the roles of art, place, and community participation in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. The study had three objectives: 1. to design and develop such a learning process, 2.to analyze the spatial, artistic, and participatory learning outcomes affecting participants’ perceptions and attitudes toward intangible cultural heritage conservation, and 3. to examine the alignment of Art-Based Learning (ABL), Place-Based Education (PBE), Participatory Action Research (PAR), Community-Based Art Education (CBAE), and Critical Pedagogy within contemporary cultural knowledge management. Employing participatory action research, the study was conducted over four months through three phases: co-design, workshop implementation at the Sri Charoen keel beam site, and collective reflection. Data were drawn from 42 completed questionnaires, together with observation, focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, and artwork analysis.The findings showed that 100% of participants reported greater understanding and appreciation of cultural values, 97.62% indicated that the activities met their expectations, and 88.10% expressed interest in joining future conservation networks. Qualitative findings further confirmed that ABPL fostered four dimensions of learning—technical knowledge, affective and aesthetic engagement, cultural-ecological understanding, and social-communicative learning—while enhancing spatial awareness and enabling the community to act as co-creators of knowledge. The study suggests that ABPL has strong potential as a cultural learning innovation for both community and educational contexts.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

สำนักงานวัฒนธรรมจังหวัดพระนครศรีอยุธยา. (2565). ภูมิปัญญาการต่อเรือ. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 มิถุนายน 2568, จาก

https://ayutthaya.m-culture.go.th/th/db_88_ayutthaya_21/14268

Barrett, T. (2008). Why is that art?: Aesthetics and criticism of contemporary art. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Darts, D. (2006). Art education for a change: Contemporary issues and the visual arts. Art Education, 59(5), 6–12.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. Retrieved June 14, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003

Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S.

Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA:

SAGE Publications.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Musigakama, P., Srisopon, S. and Chimvilaisup, A. P. (2025). Art-led approach to intangible heritage education: Wooden boat craftsmanship in Ayutthaya. Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 81–91.

Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Schnüttgen, S. (2025). Living heritage—A contribution from UNESCO. In C. Wulf (Ed.), Handbook on intangible cultural practices as global strategies for the future: Twenty years of the UNESCO convention on safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (pp. 39–54). Retrieved June 14, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72123-6_2

Smith, L. and Akagawa, N. (Eds.). (2009). Intangible Heritage. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Srisopon, S., Rueangsawat, P., Musigakama, P. and Chimvilaisup, A. P. (2025). A conservation and development model for Sri Charoen Shipyard: The future of riverside cultural heritage. The 13th International Arts and Design Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved June 14, 2025, from https://workinprogress-symposium.design/show-case/show-case-2025/sasikan-srisopon-2/

Tuck, E. and McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. London: Routledge.

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Paris: UNESCO.