The important factors for the redevelopment of abandoned mines in Thailand : case study compares the mines redeveloped by the government and private sector.

Main Article Content

Sumalee Mana
Cuttaleeya Jiraprasertkun

Abstract

 


The article is a part of research aims to investigate important factors for the redevelopment of abandoned mines in Thailand. The research compares the development process of two uncontaminated mines, one developed by the government and another by private sector. The data was collected via semi-structured interviews with the project administrators. The result illustrated that physical factor is the first supporting factor enabling the developer to choose and proceed with the development. While stakeholder factor helps supporting the whole operation process, from the start until the project is finished and open until today. Besides, management factor relating to project leader’s vision plays important part driving the operation completed. The study of two abandoned mines contributes to important lessons that the major obstacles to the mining redevelopment in Thailand come from policy factor which keeps changing, law and regulation factor which still lacks of supports for remediation process, and financial and economic factor which relates to the search for funding agencies. These three obstacles can cause further problems in management during the whole operation process. The data together with the study of abandoned mine redevelopment in overseas indicate in the same way that Thailand should develop supporting mechanisms for these three factors to increase numbers of mining redevelopment and pushing these projects to the success.


 

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Ahmad, Naveed, Y. Z., Zahid Shafait, Umer Farooq Sahibzada, Abdul Waheed,. (2019). Critical barriers to

brownfield redevelopment in developing countries : The case of Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner

Production, 212, 1193-1209.

Bartsch, C., Professionals, N. A. o. L. G. E., & Institute, N.-M. (2004). Unlocking Brownfields: Keys to Community

Revitalization: National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals.

Bannon, K. J. (2009). The brownfield-transit connection opportunities for synthesis of best practices in

Indianapolis .

EPA, T. U. S. E. P. A. (2006a). Anatomy of Brownfi elds Redevelopment. Retrieved from

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/anat_bf_redev_101106.pdf

EPA, T. U. S. E. P. A. (2006b). Brownfields Solutions Series : Anatomy of a Brownfields Deal. Retrieved

from https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P1000EUE.TXT

EPA, T. U. S. E. P. A. (2006c). Brownfields Success Stories. Retrieved from

https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-success-stories

Laraia, M. (2019). Relevant factors for redevelopment. In Beyond Decommissioning (pp. 89-133).

Leney, A. D. (2008). A systems approach to assess the redevelopment options for urban brownfield

sites. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ddu&AN=BA96434BA6325FFE&site=ehost-live

Available from EBSCOhost ddu database.

Swickard, Timothy J. (2008). Regulatory Incentives to Promote Private Sector Brownfield Remediation and

Reuse. 17(2), 121-136. doi:10.1080/15320380701870393

U.S. EPA. (The United Stated Environmental Protection Agency) (2012a). PREPARED WORK BOOK : Process

for Risk Evaluation, Property Analysis and Reuse Decisions.

U.S. EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2012b). Brownfields Road Map to Understanding

Options for Site Investigation and Cleanup (6 ed.).

US.EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2019). Brownfield Action: Questions about

Brownfields.

กพร, ก. (2014). กพร.เผยมาตรการกำกับดูแลเหมืองแร่เก่า กว่า ๑,๘๐๐ แห่งทั่วไทยเพื่อการฟื้นฟูพื้นที่ภายหลังการปิด

เหมือง. กระทรวงอุตสาหกรรม.

กรมพัฒนาที่ดิน. (2006). ข้อมูลพื้นที่ร้าง. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/PhTN0q