อิทธิพลของปัจจัยพื้นอารมณ์ต่อความคาดหวังสไตล์รายการคุณภาพและการเปิดรับสื่อโทรทัศน์มัลติแพลตฟอร์ม

ผู้แต่ง

  • สุวัฒนา นริศรานุกูล Thammasat University
  • อัจฉรา ปัณฑรานุวงศ์ คณะวารสารศาสตร์และสื่อสารมวลชน มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์

คำสำคัญ:

พื้นอารมณ์ , สไตล์รายการคุณภาพ, สื่อโทรทัศน์มัลติแพลตฟอร์ม, การวัดผลสื่อโทรทัศน์

บทคัดย่อ

This research seeks to study an approach for developing an exposure measurement system on television platforms tailored to the diverse preferences of Thai audiences in the digital age. Drawing upon David Keirsey's temperament theory, classifying into four distinct groups: 1) Rationalists, 2) Artisans, 3) Guardians, and 4) Idealists.

The research aims to explore how temperamental factors influence both both expectation for quality program styles and viewership patterns across multi-platform television in Thailand. The study employed a survey method, utilizing a questionnaire to gather data, yielding a total of 532 sample sets.

The research result revealed that the temperamental factors of viewers could partially predict the expectations of quality program styles and multi-platform television viewing. Specifically, the findings are as follows:

1) Temperamental Factors predict Program Style Expectations: Viewers with a temperament characterized by wisdom seekers (combining the characteristics of rationalists and artisans) can predict expectations for learning and socially conscious program styles, as well as artistic value program styles. Ideologists predict popular entertainment program styles and learning and socially conscious program styles. All predictions are positive.

(2) Temperamental Factors predict Multi-Platform Television Viewership: Wisdom seekers negatively predict the viewership of broadcast television. Ideologists positively predict the viewership of live streaming on online television platforms, while Guardians negatively predict the viewership of live streaming on online television platforms.

References

รมิดา ลีลาพตะ. (2567). เรตติงแบบข้ามแพลตฟอร์ม: ความคาดหวังและบทเรียนของอุตสาหกรรมโทรทัศน์ดิจิทัลไทย. วารสารการสื่อสารและการจัดการ นิด้า, 10(1), 21-37. https://www.shorturl.asia/5hUz6

Albers, R. (1996). Quality in Programming from the Perspective of the Professional Programme Maker. pp. 101–44 in S. Ishikawa (ed.) Quality Assessment in Programming. Luton: University of Luton Press.

Bourdieu. P. (1998). On television. New Press. https://monoskop.org/images/1/13/Bourdieu_Pierre_On_Television.pdf

Bourdon, J., & Méadel, C. (2014). Deconstructing the ratings machine: An introduction. In

J. Bourdon and C. Méadel (Eds), Television Audiences across the world. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345103_1

Chen, Y.-N., (2019). Competitions between OTT TV platforms and traditional television in Taiwan: A Niche analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), Article 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.006

Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1984). Please understand me: Character and temperament types

(5th ed.). Prometheus Nemesis Book.

Leggatt, T. (1996). Quality in Television: The Views from Professionals. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality Assessment in Programming (pp. 145-168). Luton: John Libbey Media.

Lima, A. C. E. S., & de Castro, L. N. (2016). Predicting temperament from twitter data. In 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 599-604). Kumamoto. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iiai-aai.2016.239

McKeen, R. L., and McSwain C. 1990. “Keirsey-Bates temperament categories: A basis for motivational interventions” Human Resource Development Quarterly, p237-250.

Meijer, I. C. (2005). Impact or content? Ratings vs quality in public broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 20(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105049632

Soper, D.S. (2006-2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. Available from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.

Stokes, P. (2003). Temperament, learning styles, and demographic predictors of college student satisfaction in a digital learning environment [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama]. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482454.pdf

Warner, W. Lloyd.(1949). Social Class in America. Chicago: Science Research Associates, Incorporated, 1949.

Yutthanavee. (2567). นักศึกษาปัจจุบัน. กระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. https://data.mhesi.go.th/dataset/univ_std_11_01.

Downloads

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2024-12-06