Learning Extension Model to Become Agricultural Entrepreneurs of Young Smart Farmers in Lower Northeastern Province Group 1

Main Article Content

Seesuda Seela
Benchamas Yooprasert
Sineenuch Khrutmuang Sanserm
Parinyarat Poosiri

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to study 1) the learning conditions and the need for learning extension to become the agricultural entrepreneurs of young smart farmers, 2) the learning of young smart farmers who were model agricultural entrepreneurs, 3) there was the learning extension to young smart farmers to become the agricultural entrepreneurs of the agricultural extensionists, 4) factors that affected learning extension as the agricultural entrepreneurs of young smart farmers, 5) there was the creation and evaluation of a learning extension model to become the agricultural entrepreneurs of young smart farmers.   


This research was mixed methods research with 3 population groups: 1) the 1,800 young smart farmers in the lower northeastern region such as Nakhon Ratchasima, Chaiyaphum, Surin, and Buriram provinces. The sample size was determined by Taro Yamane’s formula which had an error value of 0.05. The sample size was 327 people using the simple random sampling by lottery method; 2) A total of 8 young smart farmers (2 people from each province) were selected as the model agricultural entrepreneurs. The data were collected by in-depth interviews and analyzed by content analysis; 3) Agricultural extensionists who worked with young smart farmers in the lower northeastern provincial group 1. They consisted of the provincial agricultural extensionists. Representatives of 1 person per province, totaling 4 people were selected specifically; A total of 88 district agricultural extensionists were specifically selected as representatives from all districts of 4 provinces. Therefore, the total number of district and provincial agricultural extensionists was 92 people. Data were collected by questionnaires and analyzed by using descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis, and content analysis.


The results of this research found that 1) It was a high level of the received learning extension and the required learning extension of overall knowledge content. There was a need for a standard of quality of safe agricultural products, business management and agricultural product marketing, agricultural productivity, and production of standardized agricultural products at a high level. 2) Young smart farmers were the model agricultural entrepreneurs who had the learned important knowledge to be agricultural entrepreneurs. It consisted of accessing the fund sources, processing and asking permission from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), agricultural innovations, and online marketing. 3) The learning extensional conditions of agricultural extensionists found that they mostly promoted the learning for young smart farmers to be agricultural entrepreneurs who could link learning to be consistent with work and apply the obtained knowledge in practice. They mostly promoted farming knowledge and used social media such as Line application. 4) Factors that affected learning extension to be the agricultural entrepreneurs as follows. Positive factors included experience in farming, participation of group members, the promotional requirement for the learning extensional process, and the promotional requirement for knowledge content. Negative factors included the promotional receiving in the preparation steps of learning extension and the steps of learning evaluation. 5) A learning extension model to be the agricultural entrepreneurs of young smart farmers in the lower northeastern provincial group 1 that was created. It consisted of 4 main components: (1) learning information sources were household members, members of the young smart farmer network, experts, and information technology, which promoted learners to group the professional learning communities; (2) knowledge content emphasized learning on the production of safe agricultural products, business management and agricultural product marketing, agricultural productivity, production of standardized agricultural products, accessing the fund sources, processing and asking permission from the FDA, agricultural innovations, and online marketing; (3) the learning extension process was self-directed learning that emphasized the young smart farmers being responsible for their learning and having independent learning; (4) the results of the extension on young smart farmers showed that they were agricultural entrepreneurs with knowledge and skills in the practices of agricultural production, farm business, and marketing. The evaluation result of opinions on the created model was found that the model had the highest benefit, suitability, and possibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Seela, S., Yooprasert, B., Khrutmuang Sanserm , S., & Poosiri, P. (2025). Learning Extension Model to Become Agricultural Entrepreneurs of Young Smart Farmers in Lower Northeastern Province Group 1. Electronic Journal of Open and Distance Innovative Learning (e-JODIL), 15(2), 225–239. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/e-jodil/article/view/278234
Section
Research article

References

Boonyeam, P. (2021). An Extension Model for Smart Farming for Vegetable Production by Young Smart Farmers in Eastern Region of Thailand (Doctoral Dissertation). Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. Nonthaburi.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1990). New Venture Strategic Posture, Structure, and Performance: An Industry Life Cycle Analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 123-135.

Department of Agricultural Extension. (2023). Annual Action Plan 2024, Department of Agricultural Extension. Bangkok: Department of Agricultural Extension.

Integrated Provincial Administration Committee, Lower Northeastern Region Provincial Group 1. (2024). Lower Northeastern Region Provincial Group Development Plan 1. Lower Northeastern Region Provincial Group Strategy Management Office 1.

Kusol, K., & Samienpetch, T. (2015). Self-directed Learning Ability as a Learning Outcomes of Problem-based Learning of Walailak University Nursing Students. Journal of Nursing and Education, 8(3), 127-138.

Low, M., & MacMillan, I. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14, 139-161

Malairat, P. (2018). Guidelines for Farmer Development Based on the Concept of Young Smart Farmers in Ongkharak District Nakhon Nayok Province (Master’s thesis). Kasetsart University. Bangkok.

Paenthongkam, S. (2002). A Comparison of Learning Achievement in Marketing Principles of the Diploma Level Students Taught by Group Process Instruction and Conventional Approach (Master’s thesis). Silpakorn University. Retrieved from https://sure.su.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/7315?attempt=2&&locale-attribute=en

Rattanathongkham, S. (2013). Teaching Publications, Systematic Teaching Design. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://ams.kku.ac.th/aalearn/resource/edoc/tech/56web/11system56.pdf

Schollhammer, H. (1982) Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship. United States: Prentice Hall.

Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo-Mossi, J. C. (1986). Preserving Entrepreneurship as Companies Grow. Journal of Business Strategy, 11, 10–23.

Tanunchailert, A. (2015). Guideline for Developing of New Generation Farmers to be Agricultural Entrepreneurs in Phayao Province (Master’s thesis). Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. NonthaBuri.

Tumhiran, C. (2017). Techniques Methods and Communication in Agricultural Extension and Development.

In Agricultural Extension for Development Course Summary (Unit 5). Nonthaburi: Department of Agriculture and Cooperatives Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University.

Yoprasit, B. (2022). Community of Practice and Professional Learning Community in Knowledge Management for Agricultural Extension and Development. In The Practice Exercise set of Knowledge Management and Knowledge Transfer in Agricultural Extension and Development. Nonthaburi: Department of Agriculture and Cooperatives Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University