Behavior Modification Using the Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates Technique and Token Economy to Improve English Handwriting among Thai Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, behavior modification was used to enhance students’ English handwriting. Twelve Thai students were included in this study. The target behavior was their ability to write English neatly in order to be readable. Problem behaviors identified were writing too quickly, concentrating on other activities, and chatting with friends. A behavior modification technique was used (Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates – DRL) along with praise and a token economy. All subjects were asked to write an essay as per normal, but they would obtain a token when they accomplished the given task. Tokens could be exchanged for two provided gifts. Three months after the experiment commenced, subjects were retested by a rubric. The result of the behavior modification was quite satisfying since the students’ handwriting could be read clearly and their writing skills had developed. The technique could be applied to other classes such as language, science, and history which involve handwritten work.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
References
Ayllon, T., Milan, M., Roberts, M., & McKee, J. (1979). Correctional rehabilitation and management: A psychological approach. New York: Wiley.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Graham, S. (2003). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: Research-based applications and examples. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 109–123.
Bounds, G. (2010). How handwriting trains the brain: Forming letters is key to learning, memory, ideas. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527487046315045755319327 54922518
Cooper, J., Heron, T., & Heward, W. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson Education.
Cowdery, G., Iwata, B., & Pace G. (1990). Effects and side effects of DRO as treatment for self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(4), 497–506.
Deitz, S. (1977). An analysis of programming DRL schedules in educational settings. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 15(1), 103–111.
Deitz, S., & Repp, A. (1973). Decreasing classroom misbehavior through the use of DRL schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(3), 457–463.
Epstein, M., Repp, A., & Cillinan, D. (1978). Decreasing “obscene” language of behaviorally disordered children through the use of a DRL schedule. Psychology in the Schools, 15(3), 419–423.
Feder, K., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development competency and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(4), 312–317.
Graham, S., Bereninger, V., Abbott, S. & Whitaker, D. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182.
Graham, S. (2010). Want to improve children’s writing? Don’t neglect their handwriting. American Educator, 76(1), 49–55.
Iamsupasit, S. (1998). Behavioral modification theories and techniques. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
James, K. (2012). How printing practice affects letter perception: An educational cognitive neuroscience perspective. Presented at Handwriting in the 21st Century? An Educational Summit, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.hw21summit.com/media/zb/hw21/files/H2948_HW_Summit_White Paper eVersion.pdf
Kostinas, G., Scandlen, A., & Luisellie, J. (2001). Effects of DRL and DRL combined with response cost on perserverative verbal behavior on an adult with mental retardation and obsessive compulsive disorder. Behavioral Interventions, 16, 27–37.
McLaughlin, T., & Malaby, J. (1972). Reducing and measuring inappropriate verbalizations in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 329–333.
Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2007). Handwriting: What do we know and what do we need to know? Literacy, 41, 10–15.
O’Donohue, W., Fisher, J., & Hayes, S. (2003). Cognitive behavior therapy: Applying empirically supported techniques in your practice. New Jersey: Wiley.
O’Leary, K. D., & Wilson, G. T. (1987). Behavior therapy: Application and outcome. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Recine, D. (2017). IELTS Writing: Do you lose points for bad handwriting? Retrieved from https://magoosh.com/ ielts/ielts-writing-lose-points-bad-handwriting/
Somprayoon, W. (2010). Thai language teaching technique. Bangkok: Dok-Ya Academy.