Employee Perceptions of Organizational Climate Factors in a Private School System
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research was undertaken to assess employee perceptual positivity of selected current and expected organizational climate factors in a private school system. A survey adapted and modified from the Charles F. Kettering Ltd. School Climate Profile was developed consisting of 11 climate factors and 55 positive statements followed by an open-ended comment section. Completed, valid responses were received from employees (N = 215) across four different schools. A One-Way ANOVA and a t-test were used to determine perceptions. Overall employee perceptual expectations of climate factors were very high in every climate factor (mean = 3.79 on a 4.00 scale), while the overall perceptions of current climate factors were high to moderate (mean = 3.08). The highest perceptions of current climate factors were attributed to respect (3.26) and communication (3.26), while the lowest factors were trust (2.85) and morale (2.90). Open-ended findings generally supported statistical findings. Spirituality and caring were perceived to be among the strongest organizational climate aspects in these schools. Resources ranked as one of the weakest aspects across all schools. Morale was not perceived to be a strong aspect in any of the schools, and was perceived to be among the weakest aspects at most schools.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
References
Ashkanasy, N., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. (2000). The handbook of organizational culture and climate. Sage.
Griffin, R., & Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations (11th ed.). South-Western/Cengage Learning.
Johnson, W., & Johnson, A. (1992). A study on the Kettering school climate scale. Education, 112(4), 635–639.
Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73–79.
Payne, R. L., (2000). Climate and culture: How close can they get? In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson, (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 163–176). Sage.
Peterson, M., & Spencer, G. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. New Directions for Institutional Research, 17(4), 3–18.
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Schein, E. (2000). Sense and nonsense about culture and climate. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson, (Eds.). Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. xxiii–xxx). Sage.
Schneider, B. (2000). The psychological life of organizations. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. xvii–xxi). Sage.
Stolp, S., & Smith, S. (1995). Transforming school culture: Stories, symbols, values & the leader's role. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED386783
Stringer, R. (2002). Leadership and organizational climate: The cloud chamber effect. Prentice Hall.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.