A Meta-Synthesis of Effective Practices and Outcomes in the Use of Manipulatives for Teaching Mathematics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Use of manipulatives in mathematics classes has yielded compelling evidence of their value in improving several aspects of mathematics education. This report endeavored to gain a clearer picture of their benefits by using a meta-synthesis technique by integrating findings from 12 previous qualitative or mixed methods studies. They were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and summarized using a PRISMA diagram. Content analysis identified five main themes: (a) activation of classroom engagement and participation, (b) building of confidence and motivation, (c) enhancement of mathematical proficiency, (d) availability and accessibility of varied resources as manipulative, and (e) teachers’ competency and careful planning. A meta-theme that emerged was Optimizing Mathematics Learning with Effective Classroom Resources through Manipulatives. Thematic study revealed that strategically integrating manipulatives into classroom instruction has a favorable influence on student engagement, confidence, motivation, and mathematical ability. By incorporating manipulatives into mathematics instruction, educators may create inclusive, engaging, and dynamic learning environments that encourage deeper conceptual comprehension.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
References
Agodu, I. (2016). Exploring the effect of manipulatives on students’ performance. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 1(6), 36–45. https://www.multidisciplinaryjournal.net/archives/2016/vol1/issue6/ 1-5-35
Allen, C. (2007). An action based research study on how using manipulatives will increase students' achievement in mathematics [Research paper, Marygrove College]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499956.pdf
Angco, R. J. N. (2021). Error analysis in integral calculus: A modified Newman’s approach. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS), 4(9), 38–52. https://www.arjhss.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ F493852.pdf
Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1–6. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096945.pdf
Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc. 2018.0003
Bungao-Abarquez, E. (2020). The use of manipulative in teaching elementary mathematics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(11), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.11.3
Butcher, K. K. (2023). A case study examining the experiences of middle school teachers who use manipulatives to foster the self-efficacy of students with math difficulties [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University]. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/4296/
Carbonneau, K. J., Wong, R. M., & Borysenko, N. (2020). The influence of perceptually rich manipulatives and collaboration on mathematic problem-solving and perseverance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101846
Charles-Cole, S. (2020). PGCE primary trainee teachers' perceptions and accounts of using manipulatives when teaching mathematics on placement [Doctoral dissertation, University College London]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10113091
Chiphambo, S. M., Mashologu, M. N., & Mtsi, N. (2020, October). Effect of physical manipulatives on learners’ understanding of surface area and volume of prisms. In Proceedings of the South Africa International Conference on Education (SAICEd) (pp. 328–338). https://wsu.figshare.com/articles/conference_ contribution/Effect_of_Physical_Manipulatives_on_Learners_Understanding_of_Surface_Area_and_ Volume_Of_Prisms/22240789/1
Donovan, A. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2021). Toys or math tools: Do children’s views of manipulatives affect their learning? Journal of Cognition and Development, 22(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021. 1890602
Enki, K. (2014). Effects of using manipulatives on seventh grade students’ achievement in transformation geometry and orthogonal views of geometric figures [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
Gaylo, D. N., & Dales, Z. I. (2017). Metacognitive strategies: Their effects on students’ academic achievement and engagement in mathematics. World Review of Business Research, 7(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 3951851
Golafshani, N. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and teaching mathematics with manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de l'Education, 36(3), 137–159. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057978.pdf
Goracke, M. A. (2009). The role of manipulatives in the eighth-grade mathematics classroom [Research project]. University of Nebraska. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=mathmid actionresearch
Gresham, G. (2021). Exploring exceptional education preservice teachers’ mathematics anxiety. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 13. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol15/iss2/13/
Gürbüz, R. (2007). Olasılık konusunda geliştirilen materyallere dayalı öğretime öğretime ilişkin öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri [Teachers’ and students’ views on teaching based on materials developed on probability]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 259–270. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/819254
Hidayah, I., Dwijanto, & Istiandaru, A. (2018). Manipulatives and question series for elementary school mathematics teaching on solid Geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.12973/ iji.2018.11344a
Jagnandan, A., & Jagnandan, S. (2024). An examination of the effects of manipulatives on university mathematics students' motivation, retention rate, and mathematical performance. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 20(1), 14–21. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jm/papers/Vol20-issue1/Ser-2/B2001021421.pdf
Kabel, M., Hwang, J., & Hwang, J. (2021). Lessons learned from a rural classroom study: Transitioning from concrete to virtual manipulatives to teach math fact fluency to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.7
Karten, T. J., & Murawski, W. W. (2020). Co-teaching do’s, don’ts, and do betters. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Kwon, H., & Capraro, M. M. (2023). The effects of using manipulatives on students’ learning in problem posing: The instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.26711/ 007577152790026
Lange, J. (2021). The importance of using manipulatives in math class [Master’s thesis, Northwestern College]. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/291/
Laski, E. V., Jor’dan, J. R., Daoust, C., & Murray, A. K. (2015). What makes mathematics manipulatives effective? Lessons from cognitive science and Montessori education. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2158244015589588
Liggett, R. S. (2017). The impact of use of manipulatives on the math scores of grade 2 students. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 26(2), 87–101. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1160704.pdf
Maboya, M. J., Jita, L. C., & Chimbi, G. T. (2020). South African teachers' beliefs and the use of manipulatives to resolve the concept-symbol schism in mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5414–5424. https://doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.081144
Maboya, M. J. (2014). The relationship between teachers' mathematical knowledge and their classroom practices: A case study on the role of manipulatives in South African primary schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State]. https://scholar.ufs.ac.za/items/64d55d05-2dc8-40d6-a977-4a9875f971b4
McMahon, M. (2023). The impact of fraction manipulatives on 5th grade students' confidence and math skills. The Journal of Teacher Action Research, 10(2), 1–19. https://jtar-ojs-shsu.tdl.org/jtar/article/view/89
Monte, J. (2021). An exploration of manipulatives in math education [Research paper, Bridgewater State University]. https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/485.
Muammar, M., & Suhartina, S. (2018). Media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dalam meningkatkan minat belajar akidah akhlak [Information technology-based learning media in increasing interest in learning akidah akhlak]. Kuriositas: Media Komunikasi Sosial DanKeagamaan, 11(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/ 10.35905/Kur.V11i2.728
Quane, K. (2022). Evaluating factors that influence young children's attitudes towards mathematics: The use of mathematical manipulatives [Research paper, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED623708.pdf
Schumacher, C. R. (2021). Qualitative research on math manipulatives in montessori and traditional elementary 1st-3rd grade classrooms [Master’s paper, University of Wisconsin]. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/ 82448
Sulistyaningsih, D., Mawarsari, V. D., & Hidayah, I. (2017). Manipulatives implementation for supporting learning of mathematics for prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1), 1–6. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012047/pdf
Tan, M. Y. E. (2020). The beliefs and practices of primary school teachers regarding the teaching of number using mathematics manipulatives [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney]. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/24156
Tjandra, C. (2023). Effectiveness of using manipulatives in mathematics teaching in inclusive education programs in an elementary school. Dharmas Education Journal, 4(1), 168–178. https://ejournal.undhari.ac.id/index. php/de_journal
Unamba, E. C., & Njoku, C. (2023). Assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation level in learning mathematics using manipulatives among early childhood care education pre-service teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 3(12), 7–18. https://www.openjournals.ijaar.org/ index.php/ijresd/article/view/302/310
Ünlü, M. (2022). How do preservice mathematics teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics? Acta Didactica Napocensia, 15(2), 343–355. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1363756
Vinson, B. M. (2001). A comparison of pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety before and after a methods class emphasizing manipulatives. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 89–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1012568711257
Vizzi, A. (2016). Teachers' perceptions of manipulatives during middle school math instruction [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/2080/
Wong, P. P. Y., Wong, G. W. C., Techanamurthy, U., Mohamad, W. S. B., Febriana, A., & Chong, J. C. M. (2022). Using social mobile learning to stimulate idea generation for collective intelligence among higher education students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(2), 150–169. https://scholars.ln.edu.hk/en/ publications/using-social-mobile-learning-to-stimulate-idea-generation-for-col
Yağcı, F. (2010). The effect of instruction with concrete models on eighth grade students’ probability achievement and attitudes toward probability [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12612615/index.pdf