Examining Biopsychosocial Factors Influencing Drug Use Among Incarcerated Individuals and the Voluntarily Surrendered: Implications for Drug Treatment Programs in the Philippines

Main Article Content

Jason Manaois

Abstract

Abstract


Aim/Purpose: This study aimed to identify multifaceted factors contributing to drug use and dependence. It sought to delineate characteristics of two distinct groups of drug users: those incarcerated with pending drug-related court cases, and those who have voluntarily surrendered to participate in community-based interventions. By examining the interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors, this research provides a wide-ranging understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving substance use behaviors. Furthermore, the study explored how these biopsychosocial dimensions influence the progression and persistence of substance use disorders. Through rigorous analysis, it aimed to uncover specific patterns and correlations that can inform targeted intervention strategies. Ultimately, this research aspires to enhance the effectiveness of community-based interventions and contribute valuable insights to the broader substance use disorder treatment field.


Introduction/Background: The global crisis of illegal drug use remains a significant threat to public safety and health, affecting millions of adults worldwide. In the Philippines, the government’s "Oplan Tokhang" initiative, launched in 2016, led to more than 1.26 million people surrendering to authorities. Although some research exists on the nature of drug use in the Philippines, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding the characteristics of individuals impacted by the Philippine government's anti-illegal drug campaign. Drug use can be explained in various ways, but health behaviors are complex and influenced by multiple contextual factors, making a single explanation insufficient. This study employed a biopsychosocial framework to analyze a multifactorial profile of drug users. By examining biological, psychological, and social dimensions, the research sought to elucidate the intricate interactions contributing to substance use disorders. Research supports that these interconnected factors contribute to the development of substance use disorders.


Methodology: This study employed a cross-sectional design, involving 564 respondents from Metro Manila, Philippines divided into two groups: 340 voluntary surrenderers and 224 incarcerated plea bargainers. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants, ensuring the inclusion of individuals actively engaged in intervention programs. The study meticulously followed ethical research standards to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the collected data. This approach provided a relevant and focused sample for examining the factors influencing drug use and dependence. Anchored in a biopsychosocial framework, the survey assessed factors related to drug use across three domains: Biological (Substance use disorder, Age of first drug use, Number of drugs used), Psychological (Coping skills, Life skills, Psychological well-being), and Social (Family support, Quality of family life, Perceived community safety). Data analysis was conducted using hierarchical multiple regression and independent-samples t-tests to examine the interaction of research variables and differences between the groups.


Findings: The results revealed that the majority of recovering users were predominantly male, had low educational attainment, and primarily used “shabu” (a methamphetamine). Incarcerated plea bargainers reported higher scores on substance use disorder symptoms and were more likely to be poly-drug users compared to voluntary surrenderers. In contrast, voluntary surrenderers exhibited greater life skills and psychological well-being than incarcerated individuals. Life skills emerged as a significant predictor of substance use disorder symptoms for both groups, suggesting that the inability to cope with life demands increases the risk of substance use. Additionally, perceived community safety was a significant predictor of substance use disorder symptoms among voluntary surrenderers, underscoring the importance of supply reduction efforts. These results highlight the necessity to differentiate drug treatment approaches based on the profile of users.


Contribution/Impact on Society: The findings of this study underscored the critical importance of adopting a biopsychosocial approach to address the complex issue of drug use. By considering the interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors, a more comprehensive understanding of drug use and dependence can be achieved. These results may be used to advocate for the design and implementation of comprehensive community intervention programs tailored to facilitate the recovery of drug users, thereby promoting public health and safety.


Recommendations: To further elucidate the relationships among the various factors influencing drug use and dependence, advanced multivariate analytical techniques should be employed. These techniques would enable a more nuanced examination of the interactions between different variables. Additionally, the proposed model should be tested using more rigorous research designs, such as randomized controlled trials, to establish causality and enhance the robustness of the findings.


Research Limitations: The study was limited by its reliance on self-report scales, which may be subject to social desirability bias. Furthermore, the differing circumstances under which each group of respondents completed the scales could have influenced their responses. These limitations should be considered when interpreting the results and designing future research studies.


Future Research: Given that a significant portion of the participants were unemployed, further research should be conducted to examine the relationship between unemployment and drug use. Additionally, it is crucial to investigate the biopsychosocial traits of populations residing in more rural areas compared to individuals in Metro Manila, as these groups may exhibit distinct characteristics. Moreover, additional variables within the biopsychosocial framework that were not addressed in the current research need to be examined. For instance, factors such as childhood aggression and life stress warrant further investigation, as they may significantly contribute to the development of substance use disorders. Understanding the interplay of these additional variables may provide a more comprehensive understanding of drug use and inform more effective intervention programs.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Ader, M. A. P., Cruz, J. M. F. D., Paudac, M. A. M., Ramos, J. M. M., Manaois, J. O., Filipinas, T. I., Tomawis, M. C., & Barros, M. L. R. (2024). Examining the relationship between authoritative parenting style and drug dependence among PWUDs: The mediating role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1101004

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed). American Psychiatric Publishing.

Bahji, A. (2024). Navigating the complex intersection of substance use and psychiatric disorders: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(4), 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13040999

Barnett, R. E. (2009). The harmful side effects of drug prohibition. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works, 817, 11–34. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/817

Belfiore, C. I., Galofaro, V., Cotroneo, D., Lopis, A., Tringali, I., Denaro, V., & Casu, M. (2024). A multi-level analysis of biological, social, and psychological determinants of substance use disorder and co-occurring mental health outcomes. Psychoactives, 3(2), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychoactives3020013

Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Dillworth, T. M., Chawla, N., Simpson, T. L., Ostafin, B. D., Larimer, M. E., Blume, A. W., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (2006). Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(3), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1001/10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.343

Caday, F. B. (2017). Causes of drug abuse among college students: The Philippine experience. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(4), 3430–3434. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v4i4.05

Caliwan, C. L. (2018, July 31). Close to 153K drug cases filed 2 years into Duterte’s drug war. http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1043196

Crawford, T. A. M., & Evans, K. (2016). Crime prevention and community safety. In A. Leibling, S. Maruna, & L., McAra. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dangerous Drugs Board. (2017). 2017 statistics profile of drug abusers. https://www.ddb.gov.ph/component/ content/category/45-research-and-statistics

Department of Justice (DOJ). (2018, June 26). Amended guidelines on plea bargaining. Department circular no. 027. https://www.doj.gov.ph/files/2018/DC/DC027-2018JUN%20Amended%20Guidelines%20for%20Plea %20Bargaining%20dtd%2026%20Jun%202018(1).pdf

Engel, G. L. (1978). The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 310(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb22070.x

Estrellado, N. (2025). Impact of socioeconomic status on addiction rates: Statistics. https://www.addictiongroup.org/resources/socioecomic-impact-statistics/

Felipe, C. S. (2017, December 2017). 1.37 M drug personalities surrendered nationwide - PNP. https://www.philstar.com/nation/2017/12/17/1769333/137-m-drug-personalities-surrendered-nationwide-pnp

Gavilan, J. (2016, September 19). DDB: Philippines has 1.8 million current drug users. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/146654-drug-use-survey-results-dangerous-drugs-board-philippines-2015

Gonowon, M. L (2022). The implementation of Oplan Tokhang in Iriga City. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(5), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6609379

Griffiths, M. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359

Hamidullah, S., Thorpe, H. H. A., Frie, J. A., McCurdy, R. D., & Khokhar, J. Y. (2020). Adolescent substance use and the brain: Behavioral, cognitive and neuroimaging correlates. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 14, 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00298

Harris, N. A., & Weitzman, E. R. (2024). Intensifying substance use trends among youth: A narrative review of recent trends and implications. Current Psychiatry Reports, 26, 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01554-9

Hechanova, M. R., Alianan, A. S., Calleja, M. T., Melgar, I. E., Acosta, A., Villasanta, A., Bunagan, K., Yusay, C., Ang, A., Flores, J., Canoy, N., Espina, E., Gomez, G., Hinckley, E. S., Tuliao, A. P., & Cue, M. P. (2018). The development of a community-based drug intervention for Filipino drug users. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12(12), 1–10. https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/38/

Hechanova, M. R., Manaois, J. O., Co, T. A., & Escartin, I. (2023). Biopsychosocial predictors of drug dependence among Filipino drug users in community-based drug rehabilitation. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2023.2217417

Kaynak, Ö., Whipple, C. R., Kliewer, W. L., & Lepore, S. J. (2021). Peer victimization exposure and subsequent substance use in early adolescence: The role of sleep problems. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 1254–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01410-6

Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(2), 97–129. https://doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.

Latvala, A., Kuja-Halkola, R., D’Onofrio, B. M., Jayaram-Lindström, N., Larsson, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2020). Association of parental substance misuse with offspring substance misuse and criminality: A genetically informed register-based study. Psychological Medicine, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002135

Liu, L., Zhang, C., & Nahata, M. C. (2025). Trends in treatment need and receipt for substance use disorders in the US. JAMA Network Open, 8(1), e2453317. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53317

Manaois, J. O., Hechanova, M. R. M., & Estuar, J. E. (2022). Mapping social network influences of recovering Filipino drug users in community-based drug rehabilitation. Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South, 10(1), 49–77. https://doi:10.13185/STJGS2022.10104

Montiel Ishino, F. A., McNab, P. R., Gilreath, T., Salmeron, B., & Williams, F. (2020). A comprehensive multivariate model of biopsychosocial factors associated with opioid misuse and use disorder in a 2017–2018 United States national survey. BMC Public Health, 20, 1740. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09856-2

Myers, M. G., & Brown, S. A. (1996). The adolescent relapse coping questionnaire: Psychometric validation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1996.57.40

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2023). New NIH study reveals shared genetic markers underlying substance use disorders. https://nida.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/2023/03/new-nih-study-reveals-shared-genetic-markers-underlying-substance-use-disorders

Palamar, J. J., Kiang, M. V., & Halkitis, P. N. (2014). Religiosity and exposure to users in explaining illicit drug use among emerging adults. Journal of Religion and Health, 53, 658–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9660-3

Psychological Association of the Philippines (PAP). (2019, January 7). A statement on promoting a scientific and humane approach to addiction and substance use. https://www.pap.org.ph/position-paper/statement-promoting-scientific-and-humane-approach-addiction-and-substance-use

Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0

Shahrabadi, S., Jalali, A., Jalali, R., & Gholami, A. (2020). Psychological, social, and motivational factors in persons who use drugs. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 15, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00273-7

Sharma, S. (2003). Measuring life skills of adolescents in a secondary school of Kathmandu: An experience. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 1(3), 170–176. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16388225/

Sinha, R. (2024). Stress and substance use disorders: risk, relapse, and treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 134(16), e172883. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI172883

Skewes, M. C., & Gonzalez, V. M. (2013). The biopsychosocial model of addiction. Principles of Addiction, 1, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398336-7.00006-1

Squeglia, L. M., Jacobus, J., & Tapert, S. F. (2009). The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40(1), 31–38. https://doi: 10.1177/155005940904000110

Summers, J. A., Poston, D. J., Turnbull, A. P., Marquis, J., Hoffman, L., Mannan, H., & Wang, M. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring family quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 777–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00751.x

Topp C. W., Østergaard S. D., Søndergaard S., & Bech P. (2015). The WHO-5 well-being index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000376585

Trujillo, C. A., Obando, D., & Trujillo, A. (2019). An examination of the association between early initiation of substance use and interrelated multilevel risk and protective factors among adolescents. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0225384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225384

Tuliao, A. P., & Liwag, M. E. C. D. (2011). Predictors of relapse in Filipino male methamphetamine users: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 10(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2011.573319

United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (UNODC) (2020). UNODC world drug report 2020: Global drug use rising; while COVID-19 has far reaching impact on global drug markets. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/ press/releases/2020/June/media-advisory---global-launch-of-the-2020-world-drug-report.html

United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (UNODC). (2024, June 26). UNODC world drug report 2024: Harms of world drug problem continue to mount amid expansions in drug use and markets. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/press/releases/2024/June/unodc-world-drug-report-2024_-harms-of-world-drug-problem-continue-to-mount-amid-expansions-in-drug-use-and-markets.html

Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023). Substance use disorders: A comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21073

Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fowler, J. S., & Tomasi, D. (2012). Addiction circuitry in the human brain. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 52, 321-336. https://doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134625

Wang, K., Shafique, S., Wang, N., Walter, S.M., Xie, X., Piamjariyakul, U., & Winstanly, E. L. (2023). Early-onset alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use with age at onset of hypertension: A survival analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 59, 1129–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02596-9

Watts, L. L., Hamza, E. A., Bedewy, D. A., & Moustafa, A. A. (2024). A meta-analysis study on peer influence and adolescent substance use. Current Psychology, 43, 3866–3881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04944-z

Woodward, D., Wilens, T. E., Glantz, M., Rao, V., Burke, C., & Yule, A. M. (2023). A systematic review of substance use screening in outpatient behavioral health settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 18, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-023-00376-z

World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision (ICD-10). https://icd.who.int/browse10/Content/statichtml/ICD10Volume2_en_ 2010.pdf

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2