Social Media and Elections: Facebook and TikTok’s Influence on First-Time Voters’ Preferences in Maasin City, Philippines

Main Article Content

Gemar B. Mori

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: Given the scarcity of studies that have specifically examined Facebook and TikTok's impact on youth political engagement, this exploration aimed to determine the frequency of use among first-time voters. It also examined their purposes for using Facebook and TikTok, as well as the level of influence these social media platforms have on their voting preferences.


Introduction/Background: In an era of digital campaigns and elections, this study examined the political preferences of first-time voters to address the research gap on the impact of Facebook and TikTok on youth political engagement. Political culture and Facebook/TikTok usage vary widely, underscoring the need for localized research to guide future studies and political communication in the Philippines. Few studies have examined these major social media platforms, especially for younger voters and political material.


This study revealed that many young voters believe that Facebook and TikTok influence their decisions, providing crucial quantitative data on first-time voters' political activity on Facebook and TikTok. Social media platforms educate, engage, and develop communities, and the study describes how material on these platforms has inspired young users to join in political debates and activities. TikTok's creative expression makes political discussions more accessible and engaging for younger viewers, increasing political understanding and mobilization. It also stresses the importance of media literacy programs to protect young people from misinformation. This study fills a research gap in youth engagement through social media and provides actionable insights for political communication techniques to reach young voters. This research is vital in addressing social media concerns and obstacles related to electoral campaigns.


Methodology: Descriptive survey research was used to measure 380 first-time voters’ frequency of Facebook and TikTok use, along with the purpose and influence level of such usage on voting preferences. These first-time voters resided in Maasin City, Southern Leyte, Philippines, were registered to vote in automated midterm National and Local Elections, were 18 years old or above, and had active accounts on Facebook and TikTok. They were selected through a snowball sampling technique; identified respondents referred other qualified first-time voters. A structured online questionnaire through Google Forms was developed by reviewing the relevant literature. Five-point Likert-type scales measured the frequency and agreement of respondents with the study’s objectives. Cronbach’s alpha, computed to verify reliability, was .88 for the fifteen statements, indicating excellent internal consistency. The data were analyzed and interpreted using descriptive statistics such as frequency distributions and mean scores; MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were conducted to test the study’s hypotheses.


Findings: First-time voters “always” used Facebook and TikTok; Facebook was “always” used as a communication medium, while TikTok was “often” used for this purpose. Both platforms frequently served as channels for social connection, civic involvement, and political participation. Facebook and TikTok were “influential” in the voting preferences of first-time voters. Moreover, evidence revealed statistically significant differences in how frequently Facebook (Wilks' Lambda = .664, F (380) = 21.23, p < .0005) and TikTok (Wilks' Lambda = .868, F (380) = 6.87, p < .0005) were used by first-time voters, the purpose of such usage, and its level of influence on their election preferences. Using Tukey’s HSD post hoc test, the results underscored the significant role of more frequent Facebook use in influencing political preferences in elections, highlighting the importance of social media exposure and engagement for aspiring and career politicians.


Contribution to Society: The research empirically substantiated Agenda-Setting, Social Identity, and the Bandwagon Effect theories within contemporary electoral participation, thus enhancing existing knowledge. It showed that first-time voters were especially susceptible to social media's influence, emphasizing the need to understand how these platforms shaped political preferences and motivated new voters. Political campaigns could adapt material for younger audiences on Facebook and TikTok to increase civic engagement, election participation, and possibly lead to better informed and more interested voters. As information sources and political discourse platforms, social media can change young voters' engagement with democracy and behavior.


Recommendations: Since first-time voters are vital to electoral success, politicians seeking reelection or leadership roles should develop Facebook and TikTok tactics. National and municipal governments should collaborate on providing non-partisan voter information through Facebook and TikTok for first-time voters. Students and youth who are no longer in school must be taught to critically evaluate political content online by educational institutions and through community extension services.


Research Limitations: This study was conducted in Maasin City; regional cities and neighboring municipalities may yield responses that reflect their distinct socio-economic conditions, social media usage, and lifestyles. Gathering data via Google Forms may also have affected respondent answers. The survey may change or shift the perspectives of the concepts under study if deepened with qualitative responses. Referral sampling may also produce a biased sample that does not accurately represent the inclusion criteria.


Future Research: Future researchers could investigate the changing influence of Facebook and TikTok on electoral behavior, emphasizing the efficacy of engagement techniques on political campaigns and electoral success, and focusing on gender or specific age groups. Future studies on the long-term impacts of social media on youth political behavior should also be initiated.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Abdu, S. D., Mohamad, B., & Muda, S. (2017). Youth online political participation: The role of Facebook use, interactivity, quality information and political interest. SHS Web of Conferences, 33, 00080. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300080

Alhaimer, R. S. (2023). Unveiling the digital persona image: The influence of social media on political candidates’ brand personality and voter behaviour in Kuwait. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02420-4

Ali, M. (2024, February 4). Facebook turns 20: How the social media giant grew to 3 billion users. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/4/facebook-turns-20-how-the-social-media-giant-grew-to-3-billion-users

Alizen, A. N., Priamarizki, A., Gendiswardani, R. D. A., Nihru, S. S. N., & Akbar, R. A. M. (2024). From “FYP” to ballot box: TikTok and Indonesia’s 2024 general elections. Policy Report, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/ uploads/2024/06/PR240626_From-FYP-to-Ballot-Box.pdf

Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., Mason, W., Wilkins, A., Barberá, P., Brown, T., Cisneros, J. C., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Dimmery, D., Freelon, D., González-Bailón, S., Guess, A. M., Kim, Y. M., Lazer, D., Malhotra, N., Moehler, D., Nair-Desai, S., Barj, H. N. E., Nyhan, B., ... & Tucker, J. A. (2024). The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2321584121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321584121

Arugay, A. A. (2022, April 14). Stronger social media influence in the 2022 Philippine elections. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/stronger-social-media-influence-in-the-2022-philippine-elections/

Asia Centre. (2022, May 5). Disinformation winner of 2022 Philippines presidential election. https://asiacentre.org/disinformation-winner-of-2022-philippines-presidential-election/

%Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). The role of social media in shaping public opinion and its influence on economic decisions. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i1.37

Blassnig, S., Udris, L., Staender, A., & Vogler, D. (2021). Popularity on Facebook during election campaigns: An analysis of issues and emotions in parties’ online communication. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4399–4419. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17040/3573

Cadayday, B. A. R., Jimenez, D. M., & Boiser, S. M. (2024). Role of social media in the political landscape and voting decisions of Gen Zs in the Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(12), 720–730. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120059

Cano-Orón, L., Calvo, D., López García, G., & Baviera, T. (2021). Disinformation in Facebook ads in the 2019 Spanish general election campaigns. Media and Communication, 9(1), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3335

Carney, K. (2022). The effect of social media on voters: Experimental evidence from an Indian election. Job Market Paper, 2022, 1-44. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/carney/files/carney_jmp.pdf

Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). (2023, July 18). How media and supportive local institutions can grow voters. https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/how-media-and-supportive-local-institutions-can-grow-voters

Cervi, L., & Marí¬n-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. Profesional De La información, 30(4), e300403. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03

Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & Blesa, F. G. (2023). TikTok and political communication: The latest frontier of politainment? A case study. Media and Communication, 11(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6390

Chen, Y. (2022). Study of political campaign on TikTok. BCP Education and Psychology, 7, 310–313. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v7i.2680

Dad, N., & Khan, S. (2023). Reconstructing elections in a digital world. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(3), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2265886

Foster, O., & Markiewicz, P. (2023, May 15). How younger voters will impact elections: How legacy media and social media impact old and young voters. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-younger-voters-will-impact-elections-how-legacy-media-and-social-media-impact-old-and-young-voters/

Fujiwara, T., Müller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2024). The effect of social media on elections: Evidence from the United States. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(3), 1495–1539. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad058

Global Witness. (2022, October 21). TikTok and Facebook fail to detect election disinformation in the US, while YouTube succeeds. Global Witness Org, 21. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/digital-threats/ tiktok-and-facebook-fail-detect-election-disinformation-us-while-youtube-succeeds/

Global Witness. (2024, October 17). Before US election, TikTok and Facebook fail to block harmful disinformation. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/digital-threats/us-election-tiktok-and-facebook-fail-block-harmful-disinformation-youtube-succeeds/

Goldman, J. (2024, January 17). TikTok gains favor among Gen Z over Google for searches. EMARKETER. https://www.emarketer.com/content/gen-z-prefers-tiktok-google-searches

Henshel, R. L., & Johnston, W. (1987). The emergence of bandwagon effects: A theory. Sociological Quarterly, 28(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1987.tb00308.x

Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (eds), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1

Karimi, K., & Fox, R. (2023). Scrolling, simping, and mobilizing: TikTok's influence over generation Z’s political behavior. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 12(1), 181–208. https://www.thejsms.org/index.php/JSMS/article/view/1251/627

Kemp, S. (2024, February 21). Digital 2024: The Philippines. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-philippines

Kemp, S. (2024, January 31). The time we spend on social media. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users

Kleinnijenhuis, J., Van Hoof, A. M., & Van Atteveldt, W. (2019). The combined effects of mass media and social media on political perceptions and preferences. Journal of Communication, 69(6), 650–673. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz038

Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Michalski, T., Gibson, R., & Zajac, J. M. (2021). Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1837707

Kopti, A. M. (2023). How can social media improve youth voter engagement? Honors Projects. 350. https://digitalcommons.bridgewater.edu/honors_projects/350

Leuci, T. (2024). The impact of social media on political communication and voting behaviour: A historical analysis and case studies [Bachelor's degree thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, Italy]. https://tesi.luiss.it/id/eprint/40224

Locus, S. (2024, October 22). TikTok, Google to ban paid political ads for Eleksyon 2025. GMA Integrated News. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/924497/tiktok-facebook-ban-paid-political-ads/story/

Maxwell, M., & Donald, S. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://fbaum.unc.edu/teaching/PLSC541_Fall06/McCombs%20and%20Shaw%20POQ%201972.pdf

Mcclain, C. (2024, August 20). About half of TikTok users under 30 say they use it to keep up with politics, news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/08/20/about-half-of-tiktok-users-under-30-say-they-use-it-to-keep-up-with-politics-news/

Moir, A. (2023). The use of TikTok for political campaigning in Canada: The case of Jagmeet Singh. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157604

Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S. A., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088

Ngilangil, K. M. (2022). Tiktok on SNSU students: Engagement and influence. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(4), 150–155. https://mail.ijels.com/upload_document/issue_files/22IJELS-107202228-Tiktok.pdf

Ortutay, B. (2024, October 18). TikTok let through disinformation in political ads despite its own ban. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/facebook-tiktok-youtube-election-ads-global-witness-8caa6e1217ce4294 bcd14cb3dbc6f41d

Pierson, D. (2022, May 5). Dictator’s son uses TikTok to lead in Philippine election and rewrite his family’s past. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2022-05-05/dictators-son-uses-tiktok-to-lead-philippines-election-and-rewrite-his-familys-past

Quitzon, J. (2021, November 22). Social media misinformation and the 2022 Philippine elections. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/blogs/new-perspectives-asia/social-media-misinformation-and-2022-philippine-elections

Rathi, M., Ghosh, A., Kumari, S., Sarkar, A., & Das, A. (2021). Influence of social media on the political choice making: An exploratory study. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 8326–8339. https://tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/3284/2225

Sajid, M., Javed, J., & Warraich, N. F. (2024). The role of Facebook in shaping voting behavior of youth: Perspective of a developing country. SAGE Open, 14(2),1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241252213

Sugihartono, S. (2024, September 19). The power of social media to influence political views and geopolitical issues: Tiktok, X and Instagram. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/09/19/the-power-of-social-media-to-influence-political-views-and-geopolitical-issues-tiktok-x-and-instagram/

Yahaya, F. Y., Hassan, M. S., Azni, Z. M., Ab Hadi, S. N. I., Allam, S. N. S., & Ibrahim, N. A. N. (2024). Influence of social media on youth voting behaviour: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 1198–1207. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100101

Zamora-Medina, R., Suminas, A., & Fahmy, S. S. (2023). Securing the youth vote: A comparative analysis of digital persuasion on TikTok among political actors. Media and Communication, 11(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6348

Zeng, J., & Kaye, D. B. V. (2022). From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok. Policy & Internet, 14(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.287