Effects of a Child Development Package: Children Aged 30–35 Months at Daycare Programs in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Main Article Content

Somaly Nhem
Harth Bunhe
Prak Kosal

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This research study investigated the effect of daycare programs on improving developmental outcomes for children aged 30–35 months in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, highlighting the critical importance of Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) and the significant role of daycare centers in stimulating physical and health, cognitive, language, and social-emotional development. This paper examines how daycare programs can improve ECCD outcomes in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. It highlights the importance of structured interventions, such as the Child Development Package (CDP) and Parenting Education Program (PEP), in addressing the developmental needs of children from urban settings, where access to quality education and care is limited.


Introduction/Background: Early Childhood Care and Development is essential for health, well-being, and lifelong learning for children. The first 1,000 days are critical for brain development, with proper nutrition, healthcare, and stimulation being vital. In Cambodia, most young children are cared for by relatives, particularly grandmothers, who often lack adequate ECCD knowledge. Despite government efforts through national policies, implementation is uneven, especially in urban areas like Phnom Penh, where demand for quality daycare exceeds supply. The lack of proper daycare programs leaves many children without essential early learning opportunities, hindering their development. Daycare centers provide care and also serve as critical environments for early learning and development.


For working women, access to quality daycare is essential, as it allows them to pursue employment opportunities without compromising their children’s safety and developmental needs. Women’s active participation in the workforce supports the Cambodian government’s goals by contributing to economic growth, enhancing GDP through entrepreneurship, reducing poverty by increasing household income, promoting education and skill development, advancing gender equality and empowerment, improving health outcomes for families, and fostering social stability and community development through advocacy for better childcare options.


Methodology: To explore these dynamics, a mixed-methods approach was employed in this study to investigate the effects of daycare programs on developmental outcomes for children aged 30–35 months in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved a sample of 60 children, divided into an experimental group of 30 participants who received the CDP and a control group of 30 children who received no intervention.


Quantitative data were collected using the Child’s Early Learning Assessment Tool, which assessed four domains of child development, including physical and health, cognitive, language, and social-emotional development. Pre-test assessments established a baseline for comparison, followed by post-tests to evaluate changes resulting from the intervention.


Complementing this quantitative approach, qualitative data were gathered through thematic analysis of interviews with 21 respondents, including seven caregivers/teachers, seven caregivers caring for children at home, and seven caregivers with children in daycare, along with observational notes that provided insights into children's engagement and social interactions. Data analysis involved Analysis of Covariance to compare post-test scores between groups while controlling for pre-test scores, thus assessing the true effect of the CDP. This methodology facilitated a thorough examination of the daycare program's effectiveness, providing valuable insights into the role of structured early childhood interventions in enhancing developmental outcomes.


Findings: Significant improvements in the experimental group were found across all developmental domains. Specifically, physical and health development showed significant differences (F (1, 56) = 28.891, p < .05), with a large effect size (Partial η² = .340). Cognitive development also demonstrated significant gains (F (1, 56) = 75.958, p < .05, Partial η² = .576), while language development showed positive trends, although not statistically significant (F (1, 56) = 1.497, p > .05). Social-emotional development showed significant improvements (F (1, 56) = 23.600, p < .05, Partial η² = .296).


The interviews with teachers, caregivers, and parents revealed significant positive impacts of the CDP and PEP on child development. Caregivers reported notable improvements in children’s physical, cognitive, language, and social-emotional skills. Parents involved in the PEP adopted more positive parenting techniques, such as gentle discipline and engaging in educational activities, leading to enhanced child behavior and self-esteem. In contrast, parents without PEP support relied on punitive measures. Overall, the findings emphasized the effect of structured early childhood interventions in fostering child development and improving parenting practices in Cambodia.


Contribution/Impact on Society: This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by providing empirical evidence of the effect of structured daycare programs in enhancing child development in a Cambodian context. The findings underscore the necessity of investing in ECCD to foster holistic development, thereby supporting Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals, as well as the National Policy and National Action Plan on ECCD in Cambodia.


Recommendations: Considering the findings, the study recommends that policymakers and practitioners prioritize the establishment and funding of quality daycare centers that implement evidence-based programs like the CDP. Additionally, training for caregivers, teachers, and parents should be enhanced to ensure effective delivery of ECCD.


Research Limitation: The study’s limitations include a relatively small sample size and a focus on a specific urban area, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. The reliance on self-reported data from caregivers, teachers, and parents may also have introduced bias.


Future Research: Future research should explore the long-term impacts of daycare interventions on child development and academic success. Studies could investigate the scalability of the CDP in rural areas and its integration with national education policies to enhance ECCD across diverse contexts.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Bagnato, S. J. (2007). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention. The Guilford Press.

Barnett, W. S. (2011). Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science, 333(6045), 975–978. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1204534

Beck, K. (2020). Ensuring content validity of psychological and educational tests-The role of experts. Frontline Learning Research, 8(6), 1–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1275887

Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., Lu, C., McCoy, D., Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., Shiffman, J., Devercelli, A. E., Wodon, Q. T., Vargas-Barón, E., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2017). Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. The Lancet, 389(10064), 77–90. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67361631389-7/abstract

Britto, P. R., Lye, S. J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A. K., Matthews, S. G., Vaivada, T., Perez-Escamilla, R., Rao, N., Ip, P., Fernald, L., MacMillan, H., Hanson, M., Wachs, T. D., Yao, H. Yoshikawa, H., Cerezo, A., Leckman, J. F., Bhutta, Z. A., & Early Childhood Development Interventions Review Group, for the Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. (2017). Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16) 31390-3

Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6640316/

Burchinal, M., Zaslow, M., Tarullo, L., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Miller, P. (2016). Quality thresholds, features, and dosage in early care and education: Secondary data analyses of child outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(2), 1–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45 106669

Butler, J., Gregg, L., Calam, R., & Wittkowski, A. (2020). Parents’ perceptions and experiences of parenting programmes: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the qualitative literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(2), 176–204. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7192883/

CCR CSR & PE&D. (2020). Employer-supported children in Cambodia report. https://planete-eed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Employer-supported-childcare_Cambodia_011119.pdf

Cliff, D. P., Okely, A. D., Smith, L. M., & McKeen, K. (2009). Relationships between fundamental movement skills and objectively measured physical activity in preschool children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 21(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.21.4.436

Corsi, C., Santos, M. M. D., de Andrade Perez Marques, L., & Rocha, N. A. C. F. (2016). Impact of extrinsic factors on fine motor performance of children attending day care. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 34(4), 439–446. https://www.scielo.br/j/rpp/a/h6fLVQ8P6MQQ5j7kTTk5fMp/

Council of Ministers. (2024). Community-based childcare centers (CBCC). https://sala.moeys.gov.kh/kh/library/00002577?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExNk1na0xpR0MxMllhampTQQEeJP7I9gCTExQI7iv2SaV-wWq-RcEzP0hp-YJ_slp1aL0MBkCfrM943JZWwOU_aem_6dc3KPlPV04Fp-BzU9qLSQ

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

de Mattos Amaro, L. L., Pinto, S. A., de Souza Morais, R. L., Tolentino, J. A., Felício, L. R., Camargos, A. C. R., Ferreira, F. O., & Gonçalves, C. A. (2015). Child development: Comparison between children who attend or do not attend public daycare centres. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 25(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.103002

Denboba, A. D., Sayre, R. K., Wodon, Q. T., Elder, L. K., Rawlings, L. B., & Lombardi, J. (2019). Stepping up early childhood development: Investing in young children for high returns. World Bank Publications. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/868571468 321240018/stepping-up-early-childhood-development-investing-in-young-children-for-high-returns

Denham, S. A., & Burton, R. (2003). Social-emotional prevention programs for preschool children. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2008). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(1), 1–25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11324078/

Dwiyatna, A. A., Irwanto, Y. S., & Wardhani, I. L. (2020). The impact of child care on child development in daycare and at home. Pediatria i Medycyna Rodzinna, 16(3), 289–294. https://pimr.pl/assets/pdf/artykuly/289-294-paediatrics-family-medicine-3-2020-dwiyatna-ang.pdf

Engle, P. L., Fernald, L. C., Alderman, H., Behrman, J., O'Gara, C., Yousafzai, A., de Mello, M. C., Hidrobo, M., Ulkuer, N., Ertem, P. I., & Iltus, S. (2011). Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 378(9799), 1339–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60889-1

Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment, physical abuse, and the burden of proof: Reply to Baumrind, Larzelere, and Cowan (2002),

Holden (2002), and Parke (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 602–611. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-1284602.pdf

Grindal, T., Bowne, J. B., Yoshikawa, H., Schindler, H. S., Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2016). The added impact of parenting education in early childhood education programs: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 238–249. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1c96s2gd/qt1c96s2gd.pdf

Hands, B., & Martin, M. (2003). Implementing a Fundamental Movement Skill program in an early childhood setting: The children’s perspectives. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(4), 47–52. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=health_article

Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1128898

Indrayani, N. (2016). Language development at early childhood. International Conference on Education (IECO) Proceeding, 1, 279–289. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229218143.pdf

Jeong, J., Franchett, E. E., Ramos, de Oliveira, C. V., Rehmani, K., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2021). Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med, 18 (5), e1003602. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351464929

Knitzer, J. (2002). Promoting the emotional well-being of children and families [Policy paper No 1]. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D81V5PP3/download

Lehrer, J. S., Lemay, L., & Bigras, N. (2015). Parental perceptions of child care quality in centre-based and home-based settings: Associations with external quality ratings. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0147-8

Lovison, K., Moreira, H. S. B., Silva, J. D., Scorzafave, L. G. D. S., & Mello, D. F. D. (2021). The influence of the quality in daycare environments on children’s motor development between six to 15 months old. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 21(03), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042021000300006

Martikainen, S., Kalland, M., Linnavalli, T., Kostilainen, K., Aittokoski, M., Reunamo, J., Vasileiou, Z., & Tervaniemi, M. (2024). Supporting social-emotional development in early childhood education and care–a randomized parallel group trial evaluating the impact of two different interventions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(5), 1069–1087. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00313831. 2023.2204119

McCarty, D. (2024). The impact of using professional development to support language development focused adult-child interactions with toddlers [Master’s thesis, Northwestern College, USA]. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1612&context=education_masters

McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology, 18(3), 1–9. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html

MoEYS. (2018). State preschool curriculum. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U9iJiJOjAwlLGZx_M4vfOhLJi31SbqKP/view

MoEYS. (2022). Nurturing care. https://sala.moeys.gov.kh/en/library/00001255

Morgan, H. (2019). Does high-quality preschool benefit children? What the research shows. Education Sciences, 9(1), 19. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/1/19

Ngoun, C., De Mey, P., Baesel, K., Khann, R. K., & Stoey, L. S. (2020). Cambodian developmental milestone assessment tool (cDMAT): Performance reference charts and reliability check of a tool to assess early childhood development in Cambodian children. Early Human

Development, 141, 104934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104934

OECD. (2017). Starting strong 2017: Key OECD indicators on early childhood education and care. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/06/starting-strong-2017_g1g7a94b/9789264276116-en.pdf

Pico, M. Y., Montaño, N. V., & Tayaban, T. C. (2023). Is day care important? Basis for cognitive development of kindergarten learners. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(10), 67–78. https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1-IJAMS-OCTOBER-2023-67-78.pdf

Rahman, M. S. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1) 102–112. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1120221.pdf

Rafiyya, A., Kraiwanit, T., Limna, P., Sonsuphap, R., Kasrisom, A., & Snongtaweeporn, T. (2024). Early childhood social-emotional development: An impact on a developing country. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(5), 3081–3089. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.29462

Roberts, M. Y., & Kaiser, A. P. (2015). Early intervention for toddlers with language delays: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 135(4), 686–693. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/135/4/686/33561/Early-Intervention-for-Toddlers-With-Language

Saha, B., & Adhikari, A. (2023). The Montessori approach to the teaching–learning process. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(3), 574–578. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anasuya-Adhikari 2/publication/372368543_The_Montessori_Approach_to_the_Teaching_Learning_Process/links/ 64b2147095bbbe0c6e33bd8d/The-Montessori-Approach-to-the-Teaching-Learning-Process.pdf

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883785

Save the Children. (2017). Caregiver-reported early development index (CREDI): User’s guide. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/caregiver-reported-early-development-index-credi-users-guide/

Save the Children. (2019). IDELA – The international development and early learning assessment. Adaptation & Administration Guide. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/idela-the-international-development-and-early-learning-assessment/

Save the Children. (2022). Caregiver knowledge and practices in early childhood development. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/RAISE-Evaluation-Report.-Final.-16-March-2022-1.pdf/

Shonkoff, J. P., Richter, L., van der Gaag, J., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2012). An integrated scientific framework for child survival and early childhood development. The Lancet, 129(2), e460–e472. https://publications.aap.org/ pediatrics/article-abstract/129/2/e460/32597/An-Integrated-Scientific-Framework-for-Child

Siegel, D. J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Publications.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205511/

UNICEF. (2023). Early childhood development: UNICEF vision for every child. https://www.unicef.org/media/ 145336/file/Early_Childhood_Development_-_UNICEF_Vision_for_Every_Child.pdf

Vidrine-Isbell, B. (2017). Language attachment theory: The possibilities of cross-language relationships. In P. Portanova, J. M. Rifenburg, & D. Roen (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on cognition and writing (pp. 95–114). https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/cognition/chapter5.pdf/1000

World Bank. (2024). Supply of and demand for accessible and affordable childcare services in Cambodia. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099092424012023366/pdf/P178134194793202718f841b6a877d0c5a4.pdf

World Health Organization (WHO). (2018, May 18). Nurturing care for early childhood development. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/child-health/nurturing-care

Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 155–193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0010027790900033

Yoshikawa, H., & Kabay, S. (2015). Investing in early childhood development: A global perspective. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 1–7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885200614001124?via%3Dihub

Yulidar, R., & Sari, S. M. (2024, December 10–12). The importance of emotional development in early childhood through group activities: A literature review at TK Negeri 6 Samatiga. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Science Technology and Health (2nd ICONESTH 2024) (pp. 590–595). Universitas Bina Bangsa Getsempena, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. https://eproceeding.bbg.ac.id/iconesth/article/view/408