Participation, Appreciation, and Learning Effectiveness of the University of Antique’s Market Day Activity: A Mediation Analysis

Main Article Content

Janory P. Tutica
Marievic B. Adarga
Cherryville S. Mejares

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: Traditional business education methods are insufficient for developing competent future business leaders and successful entrepreneurs. It has been observed that current academic practices in business programs emphasize theories more than real-world application. The Commission on Higher Education (CHED), a Philippine government agency that regulates and governs higher educational institutions, has instituted many programs and initiatives to improve the quality of marketing education, ensuring that business schools sufficiently equip students for a dynamic and continually changing corporate landscape. In close collaboration with industry partners, CHED formulated a curriculum for the Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major in Marketing Management (BSBA-MM) Program that emphasizes experiential learning activities and encourages business schools to integrate marketing education with other disciplines, promoting a comprehensive grasp of the sector and developing versatile abilities. Because of the need to bridge the gap between theory and practice, the BSBA-MM Program at the University of Antique, Philippines, introduced a Market Day Activity on a simulation platform. The interactions between participation in, appreciation of, and the effectiveness of these learning styles led to the formulation of the study’s research questions.


Introduction/Background: This study investigated the interplay among Activity Participation (AP), Activity Appreciation (AA), and Learning Effectiveness (LE). It has been observed by some researchers that active student engagement in learning activities promotes better understanding and retention. Furthermore, they have established that active student engagement in their activities leads students to appreciate their learning activities, resulting in enhanced learning outcomes, and some believe that this appreciation of their learning activities influences their motivation (Samad et al., 2021).


Methodology: The Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major in Marketing Management (BSBA-MM) Program under the College of Business and Accountancy accommodates approximately 350 students across all academic year levels. Using a quantitative research design and employing simple random sampling, data were gathered from 252 BSBA-MM students who joined the 2023-2024 2nd semester Market Day Activity. A researcher-developed instrument was used in this study. An F-test power analysis indicated that the minimum sample size to yield a statistical power of 95 percent with an alpha of .05 and an effect size of (d=.30) was 252. A mediation analysis approach was employed to measure the interrelationships between student activity appreciation, participation, and learning effectiveness within the context of the BSBA-MM Program's Market Day Activity.


Findings: The results showed that Activity Participation (AP) significantly and positively affected Activity Appreciation (AA) (β = .676, t = 11.652, p < .000), while AP had a moderately positive influence on Learning Effectiveness (LE) (β = .542, t = 7.749, p < .000). This indicated that respondents with higher levels of participation (AP) showed more appreciation (AA) for Market Day Activity. Participation also had a significant direct and positive influence on learning effectiveness (β = .138, t = .080, p < .042). Meanwhile, the indirect effect of activity participation (AP) on learning effectiveness (LE) (β = .366, t = 6.018, p < .000) was partially mediated. Furthermore, these results revealed that AP impacted learning effectiveness, suggesting that encouraging students to actively participate in the Market Day Activity can lead to a stronger appreciation of and perceived importance of it, which may eventually be converted into positive learning outcomes. This emphasizes the idea that when such activities are embraced by students, one benefit of such active engagement is positive learning experiences.


Contribution/Impact on Society: By understanding the interplay among variables, educators and program administrators of the BSBA-MM Program may consider introducing policies that are based on the study's conclusions. It further suggests that in addition to student participation, other factors such as activity appreciation and learning effectiveness can drive positive educational outcomes and contribute to the overall success of the programs. Instructors should implement activities that encourage active participation, which leads to increased appreciation for the activity and contributes to students' overall academic success. These interplays will eventually translate into creating competent and effective workers, marketers, or entrepreneurs.


Recommendations: Program administrators, educators and other stakeholders of higher educational institutions should develop strategies to foster a supportive climate that encourages student participation and appreciation, as this in turn can enhance overall learning outcomes. By promoting participatory programs and active academic activities, college instructors can foster deeper student appreciation of activities, thereby producing graduates who are competent and effective business administrators and entrepreneurs. These factors are needed to succeed in the marketing industry.


Research Limitation: The research was conducted within a single program, and the findings may not be applicable to other academic programs, either within the university or elsewhere. Follow-up research on the relationships analyzed in this study across various academic programs or institutions would improve the generalizability of the results.


Future Research: Future research may integrate objective assessments of learning outcomes to validate these results. If causal inference methods were employed in future studies, this would enhance the robustness of these findings, as the cross-sectional nature of the data restricts the capacity to establish such relationships.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Amoguis, M. J. B. (2014). Business simulation laboratory: An experiential learning tool for business colleges and universities in Davao City. UIC Research Journal, 20(1), 79–93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 294119687_Business_Simulation_Laboratory_An_Experiential_Learning_Tool_for_Business_Colleges_and_Universities_in_Davao_City/fulltext/5709ff3408ae2eb9421e3708/Business-Simulation-Laboratory-An-Experiential-Learning-Tool-for-Business-Colleges-and-Universities-in-Davao-City.pdf

Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-18630-001

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bedawy, R. (2017). Experiential learning for supporting learning effectiveness in business education: A case study in Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(5), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.5539/ ijbm.v12n5p159

Black, G. S., Daughtrey, C. L., & Lewis, J. S. (2014). The importance of course design on classroom performance of marketing students. Marketing Education Review, 24(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.2753/mer1052-8008240303

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Walker, D. (1993). Using experience for learning. McGraw-Hill Education.

Bucic, T., & Robinson, L. (2016). Motivational engagement in the marketing classroom: Individual goal orientations and class climate. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0965254x.2016.1182579

Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital marketing: Strategy and implementation. Pearson Education. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3413574

CHED. (2017). Revised guidelines for student internship program in the Philippines (SIPP) for all programs. Commission on Higher Education. https://ofa.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CMO-No.104-S.2017.pdf

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED282491

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

Cummins, S., & Johnson, J. S. (2021). The impact of live cases on student skill development in marketing courses. Journal of

Marketing Education, 45(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211034553

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dernova, M. (2015). Experiential learning theory as one of the foundations of adult learning practice worldwide. In Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 5(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/rpp-2015-0040

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28–30). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification." MindTrek ’11: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15), Tampere, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Wang, Y., Alalwan, A. A., Ahn, S. J., Balakrishnan, J., Barta, S., Belk, R., Buhalis, D., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Filieri, R., Flavián, C., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Hollensen, S., Jain, V., Kim, J., Krishen, A. S., ... & Wirtz, J. (2023). Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of consumer research and practice. Psychology & Marketing, 40(4), 750–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21767

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Online learning and community engagement: Strategies for promoting inclusivity and collaboration in education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0693

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002224378101800104

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 00346543074001059

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henke, J. W., Locander, W. B., Mentzer, J. T., & Nastas, G. (1988). Teaching techniques for the new marketing instructor: Bringing the business world into the classroom. Journal of Marketing Education, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347538801000101

Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408095849

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Lathifah, A. S., Hardaningtyas, K., Pratama, Z. A., & Moewardi, I. (2024). Penerapan teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar siswa. DIAJAR Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v3i1.2233

Lazanas, S. H., & Urbina, M. D. C. (2023). Academic marketing climate, marketing strategies and student enrollment turnout of council admission and marketing in selected schools in District 1 Province of Laguna. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 45, 196–209.https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v45i1.9072

Liguori, E., Bendickson, J., Solomon, S., & McDowell, W. C. (2018). Development of a multi-dimensional measure for assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1–2), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537144

Luthfiandana, R., Barus, G. A., Nuraeni, N., Yanthy, S., & Pujiati, H. (2024). Marketing strategy: Segmenting, targeting, and positioning for digital business (Literature review). Siber International Journal of Digital Business (SIJDB), 1(4), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijdb.v2i1.30

Mehmood, K., Kanwal, W., & Shaheen, M. N. ul K. (2021). Implementation of activity based teaching at primary level: a theoretical perspective. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 15–21.

Morgan, F. N., & McCabe, D. B. (2012). Learning Why we buy: An experiential project for the consumer behavior course. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312450387

Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x

Ocon, R. (2012, June 10–13). Teaching creative thinking using problem-based learning [Paper presentation]. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22002

Öncü, S., & Bichelmeyer, B A. (2021, March 12). Instructional practices affecting learner engagement in blended learning Environments. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(3), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.17275/ per.21.62.8.3

Pantao, J. G. (2021). Crisscrossing textbook writing tasks and core values of education students in an outcomes-based education platform. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 520(1), 357–364). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210203.148

Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020). Assessing the authenticity of cases, internships and problem-based learning as managerial learning experiences: Concepts, methods and lessons for practice. The International Journal of Management Education,18(3), 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425

Pespeñan, R., Cababat, J., & Garma, J. (2023). Prerequisite skills in business enterprise simulation of accountancy, business, and management students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(11), 1012–1018. https://10.5281/zenodo.7574724

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-02-2021-0082

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Salmerón, R., García, C., & Garcı́a, J. (2020). Overcoming the inconsistences of the variance inflation factor: A redefined VIF and a test to detect statistical troubling multicollinearity. Cornell University arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.02245

Samad, F., Wondal, R., Mahmud, N., Haryati, H., & Purba, N. (2021). The implementation of ‘market day' activities to improve children entrepreneurship at Telkom Preschool Ternate. Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran danPembelajaran, 7(3), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i3.3597

Santos, A R. (2020). Indicators of buying influence in business markets perceived by marketing students. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(1), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.22161/ ijels.51.53

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds), Handbook of market research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-05542-8_15-1

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

SEAMEO INNOTECH (Southeast Asian Ministers of Education–Regional Center for Educational Innovation and Technology) (2019). Annual report FY 2018-2019. https://www.seameo.org/img/SEAMEO_General/ About_SEAMEO/ SEAMEO%20Units/Centres_Annual_Rpt/2018-2019/INNOTECH.pdf

Shaaruddin, J., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Identifying the effectiveness of active learning strategies and benefits in curriculum and pedagogy course for undergraduate TESL students. Creative Education, 8(14), 2312–2324. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.814158

Siddiqui, K. A. (2021). Developing marketing model canvas as an assessment tool for marketing curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(6), 1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090623

Spaanjaard, D., Hall, T., & Stegemann, N. (2018). Experiential learning: Helping students to become ‘career ready’. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj. 2018.04.003

Soomro, B. A., Memon, M., & Shah, N. (2021). Attitudes towards entrepreneurship among the students of Thailand: An entrepreneurial attitude orientation approach. Education + Training, 63(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2020-0014

Sun, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). The current situation, reform ideas and concrete measures of skill. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-19.2019.82

Talafuse, A. (2021). Marketing research: Innovation, experiential learning, and student engagement. Journal of Education for Business, 96(8), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1887792

Tan, T. A., & Vicente, A J. (2019). An innovative experiential and collaborative learning approach to an undergraduate marketing management course: A case of the Philippines. International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100309

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141

Tuten, T., & Solomon, M. (2018). Social media marketing (3rd ed). Sage Publications.

Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011

Xu, X., Shi, Z., Bos, N A., & Wu, H. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10872981.2023.2268347

Zhiyong, F. (2023). System construction of cultivating the innovative ability of marketing majors. Adult and Higher Education, 5(12), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051208