Digital Transformation Leadership in Thai SMEs During Crisis: A Multiple Case Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim/Purpose: This research addresses a critical knowledge gap in understanding how Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand, as part of an emerging economy, navigate digital transformation during periods of crisis. Specifically, the study examined digital transformation leadership practices that enable SMEs to successfully adopt digital technologies, manage organizational change, and sustain organizational resilience under conditions of uncertainty and disruption. By focusing on leadership as the central mechanism linking technology adoption and resilience, the study moves beyond technology-centric explanations and highlights the human and strategic dimensions of digital transformation in SMEs.
Introduction/Background: Digital transformation has become an essential strategic priority for organizations facing increasing environmental volatility, technological disruption, and crisis conditions. While existing literature has extensively examined digital transformation in large corporations within developed economies, research on SMEs in emerging markets remains limited. This gap is particularly significant in Thailand, where SMEs account for approximately 43% of gross domestic product and employ nearly 72% of the national workforce, positioning them as a cornerstone of economic stability. During crisis periods, such as economic shocks or systemic disruptions, the ability of SMEs to digitally transform while maintaining operational continuity becomes a matter of national economic resilience. However, prevailing digital leadership frameworks are largely derived from large-scale organizations and may not adequately reflect the contextual constraints, cultural characteristics, and leadership structures of Thai SMEs. Consequently, there is insufficient empirical understanding of how SME leaders in emerging economies conceptualize and enact digital transformation leadership during crises.
Methodology: In this study, a qualitative multiple case study approach was adopted to explore digital transformation leadership in depth and within context. Twelve Thai SMEs that had successfully implemented digital transformation initiatives during crisis periods were purposefully selected using theoretical sampling. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with SME owners, senior managers, and key stakeholders directly involved in digital transformation initiatives. These interviews were complemented by documentary analysis of organizational plans, digital project records, and internal communications, as well as direct organizational observations. The data analysis followed systematic within-case and cross-case analytical procedures, enabling the identification of recurring patterns, leadership practices, and contextual mechanisms across diverse organizational settings. This methodological design allowed for rich, nuanced insights into leadership processes that could not be captured through purely quantitative approaches.
Findings: The findings revealed three primary dimensions of successful digital transformation leadership in Thai SMEs during crisis periods. First, adaptive strategic vision was evident in 91.7% of cases, highlighting leaders’ ability to articulate a clear transformation direction while remaining flexible to rapidly changing conditions. Second, collaborative technological integration was observed in all cases (100%), emphasizing leaders’ roles in aligning digital technologies with organizational capabilities, employee readiness, and stakeholder expectations. Third, resilient change management was present in 83.3% of cases, reflecting leadership practices that guided employees through transformation while safeguarding operational stability. Across cases, leaders demonstrated what this study conceptualized as “adaptive resilience,” a dynamic leadership capability that integrates strategic foresight, technological alignment, and people-centered change leadership. Organizations reported that these leadership practices led to an average improvement of 32% in operational efficiency, a 28% increase in customer satisfaction, and a 24% growth in revenue, indicating both short-term performance gains and longer-term sustainability.
Contribution/Impact on Society: This research extends digital leadership theory by proposing an integrated framework of digital transformation leadership tailored to SMEs in emerging economies during crisis situations. The study contributes conceptually by introducing adaptive resilience as a leadership capability that enables organizations to balance innovation with stability, particularly under crisis conditions. Practically, the findings offer actionable insights for SME leaders seeking to manage digital transformation amid uncertainty. At the societal level, the research informs policymakers and supportive institutions by demonstrating that effective digital transformation requires leadership development and organizational learning, not merely investment in technological infrastructure. Strengthening leadership capacity in SMEs contributes directly to sustainable economic development and crisis preparedness in emerging market economies.
Recommendations: Based on these findings, SME leaders are encouraged to adopt phased and flexible digital transformation strategies, ensuring alignment between technological initiatives and organizational readiness. Comprehensive stakeholder communication strategies should be prioritized, as 92% of successful cases had implemented systematic communication to build trust and employee engagement. Leaders should also cultivate adaptive resilience by integrating strategic vision, participatory leadership, and continuous learning. For policymakers, the study recommends shifting policy emphasis toward leadership digital literacy, managerial capability development, and organizational learning systems, rather than focusing solely on hardware or platform adoption.
Research Limitation: This study was limited to Thai SMEs and therefore may not be directly generalizable to other cultural or institutional contexts. The focus on successful digital transformation cases may underrepresent challenges and failure dynamics encountered by less successful organizations. Additionally, while the qualitative methodology provided in-depth insights, it limited statistical generalizability across broader SME populations.
Future Research: Future studies should examine digital transformation leadership across different cultural contexts and emerging economies to assess the transferability of adaptive resilience as a leadership capability. Longitudinal research could explore how leadership strategies evolve over time and across different crisis phases. Comparative studies between successful and unsuccessful digital transformation cases would further enrich understanding of failure mechanisms. Such research would contribute to a more comprehensive and balanced theory of digital transformation leadership in SMEs.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
References
Ahrens, A., Zaščerinska, J., Melnikova, J., Jurgaityte, V., Aļeksejeva, L., & Gukovica, O. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching of immigrants in adult education: A case study in Sweden. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development, 1(12), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2020vol1.12.5390
Alajmi, M. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928
Anggraeni, A., & Nulhaqim, S. A. (2020). Social worker staffing process. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 400, 297–299. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.188
Balwant, P., & Singh, A. (2023). Role-modeling leadership in small and medium enterprises: The role of leader identification, leader–member exchange, job stress, job satisfaction, and turnover intent. Journal of Leadership Studies, 17(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21843
Chen, P., & Hao, Y. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2324
Conlon, C., Timonen, V., O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139
Dubois, A. (2024). Effects of refractive index mismatch between sample and immersion medium in line-field confocal optical coherence tomography. Journal of the European Optical Society: Rapid Publications, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2024010
Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H., & Aydın, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
Foley, G., Timonen, V., Conlon, C., & O’Dare, C. (2021). Interviewing as a vehicle for theoretical sampling in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920980957
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Vilkas, M., Grybauskas, A., & Amran, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption among manufacturing SMEs: A systematic review and transformation roadmap. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(6), 1029–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2021-0505
Halpern, N., Mwesiumo, D., Suau-Sánchez, P., Budd, T., & Bråthen, S. (2021). Ready for digital transformation? The effect of organisational readiness, innovation, airport size and ownership on digital change at airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 90, 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101949
Hasanah, V., Ardiwinata, J., Jubaedah, Y., Ariani, I., & Ardiyanto, A. (2022). The role of community mobilizers in family economic empowerment. Edukasi, 16(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukasi.v16i2.41562
Jewapatarakul, D. (2024). Digital organizational culture, organizational readiness, and knowledge acquisition affecting digital transformation in SMEs from the food manufacturing sector. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297405
Karippur, N., & Balaramachandran, P. (2022). Antecedents of effective digital leadership of enterprises in Asia Pacific. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 26. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v26i0.2525
Koh, C. (2024). Collective leadership for VUCA: From theoretical exploratory study to knowledge creation. Global Policy, 15(S6), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13429
Lei, J., Indıran, L., & Kohar, U. (2022). The digital transformation of SMEs: The difference between East and West in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i12/15718
Lukito, D., & Perdhana, M. (2023). Investigating the relationship of change leadership, knowledge acquisition, and firm performance in digital transformation context. Quality Access to Success, 24(194), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.47750/qas/24.194.32
Marczewska, M. (2023). Digital transformation: A challenging opportunity for the food industry companies. British Food Journal, 126(5), 2027–2040. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2023-0065
Naipinit, A. (2024). The influence of crisis management and management tools on firm performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Thailand. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.8.018
Odeh, R., Obeidat, B., Jaradat, M., Masa’deh, R., & Alshurideh, M. (2021). The transformational leadership role in achieving organizational resilience through adaptive cultures: The case of Dubai service sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(2), 440–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2021-0093
Peng, C., Jia, X., & Zou, Y. (2022). Does digitalization drive corporate green transformation? Based on evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 963878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.963878
Potjanajaruwit, P. (2020). Agrarian business development in accordance with the national economic and social development plan of SMEs in Thailand. E3S Web of Conferences, 175, 13036. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017513036
Pradana, Y. (2024). Implementation of strategic human resource management in improving the quality of education. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 4(2), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v4i2.8599
Promnil, N., & Polnyotee, M. (2023). Crisis management strategy for recovery of small and medium hotels after the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Sustainability, 15(5), 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054194
Ramdhany, M., Mulyadi, H., & Purnamasari, I. (2022). Change management and organizational effectiveness of culinary SMEs in Greater Bandung: Mediating role of value creation. Al-Muraqabah Journal of Management and Sharia Business, 2(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.30762/almuraqabah.v2i2.283
Rojanapanich, A., Sooksomchitra, A., Wimonchailerk, S., Mutakalin, G., & Poprateep, P. (2022). Account management, innovative management, and audit quality affect the accounting performance of small and medium enterprises in Thailand. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns3.5222
Ruslan, N., Yasin, S., Nasir, N., & Isa, M. (2024). The perceived benefits and self-efficacy of an exercise intervention on tobacco withdrawal symptoms: A qualitative study based on the health belief model. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 31(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.3.15
Senadjki, A., Yong, H., Ganapathy, T., & Ogbeibu, S. (2023). Unlocking the potential: The impact of digital leadership on firms’ performance through digital transformation. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 4(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-06-2023-0050
Suriyankietkaew, S. (2022). Effects of key leadership determinants on business sustainability in entrepreneurial enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(5), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-05-2021-0187
Teng, X., Wu, Z., & Yang, F. (2022). Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs. Sustainability, 14(10), 6012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106012
Topçuoğlu, E., Kobanoglu, M., Kaygın, E., Karafakıoğlu, E., Erdoğan, S., Torun, B., & Oktaysoy, O. (2023). The improving role of digital leadership in the impact of social loafing on job performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2023.60347
Wang, Y.-H., Dong, J., Wang, X.-F., Liu, Q., & Li, X. (2021). Grounded theory research on the factors that lead to doctor moral hazard. Saúde e Sociedade, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021190995
Weber, E., Krehl, E., & Büttgen, M. (2022). The digital transformation leadership framework: Conceptual and empirical insights into leadership roles in technology-driven business environments. Journal of Leadership Studies, 16(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21810
Yuliantini, L. (2023). The impact of the e-government development index (EGDI) on the worldwide governance indicator (WGI) in European Union countries. Policy & Governance Review, 7(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.732
Zhang, X., Xu, Y., & Ma, L. (2022). Research on successful factors and influencing mechanism of the digital transformation in SMEs. Sustainability, 14(5), 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052549
Zhu, J. (2023). How flexible leadership ability affects manufacturing enterprises’ digital transformation willingness: The role of innovation commitment and environmental dynamics. PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0288047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288047