Investigating Cognition, Attitudes, and Acceptance of Smart Elderly Care Systems among Chinese Nurses

Main Article Content

Ling Shen

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This study aimed to investigate Chinese elderly care nursing staff’s cognition, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward adopting smart elderly care systems in response to the challenges posed by rapid population aging. This study was based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The research integrated perceived usefulness, ease of use, security, performance expectancy, and organizational support into a unified structural framework, seeking to identify key determinants influencing technology adoption and inter-institutional variations within elderly care settings. The findings are expected to provide both theoretical insights and practical guidance for policymakers and institutional leaders to enhance training, optimize resource allocation, and promote sustainable implementation of smart elderly care systems in China.


Introduction/Background: China’s rapidly aging population has increased the demand for high-quality senior care, encouraging research into smart elderly care systems that combine the Internet of Things, big data, and digital technology. While such systems can improve efficiency and service accessibility, their effectiveness is highly dependent on the elderly care nurse staff’s acceptance and ability. Existing research has rarely focused on nursing staff in elderly care facilities. To fill this gap, this study investigated Chinese nurses’ cognition, attitudes, and adoption intentions for smart elderly care systems, offering evidence to promote effective technology integration and policy development.


Methodology: In this study, a cross-sectional quantitative design was employed to investigate factors that influence Chinese nursing staff’s adoption of smart elderly care systems. The survey focused on frontline providers of eldercare in China, including registered nurses, enrolled nurses, and assistant nurses, as well as eldercare aides and care workers. Participants were drawn from long-term care facilities, nursing homes, community-based eldercare institutions, and geriatric or rehabilitation wards within hospitals. The researcher designed an online survey link with a QR code and shared it with the nursing institutions, the elderly community, and the elderly healthcare institutions in different cities in China. Since the survey was online, no provinces or cities restricted it. After data screening, 537 valid responses were obtained. SmartPLS 4.0 was employed to conduct a series of analytical procedures for the structural model, including the assessment of reliability and validity, the analysis of correlation relationships among variables, and the estimation of path coefficients.


Findings: The study revealed several key findings. First, perceived usefulness, ease of use, security, performance expectancy, and organizational support positively influenced nursing staff’s attitudes toward smart elderly care systems. Second, attitude significantly influenced adoption intention, which highlights its mediating role. However, perceived organizational support did not exert a direct effect on adoption intention. Moreover, attitude mediated relationships between five antecedent variables and adoption intentions. These results aligned with prior studies and confirmed that cognitive, perceptual, and organizational factors collectively shape nurses’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward adopting smart elderly care technologies in practice.


Contribution/Impact on Society: This study enriches theoretical understanding by contextualizing TAM and UTAUT within China’s elderly care sector, emphasizing the attitudinal mechanisms underlying nurses’ adoption of smart elderly care systems. It demonstrated that organizational support indirectly influences adoption through attitudes rather than directly shaping behavioral intentions, which highlights the need to adapt organizational behavior theories to resource-limited care environments. The findings also underscored the centrality of perceived security in technology acceptance within data-sensitive healthcare settings, offering empirical evidence to guide equitable, secure, and sustainable digital transformation in elderly care services.


Recommendations: To foster effective adoption, policymakers should establish unified technical standards, enhance data protection legislation, and reduce urban–rural disparities through targeted subsidies and infrastructure development. Elderly care institutions should strengthen organizational support via continuous training, accessible technical assistance, and incentive programs that foster trust and engagement. At the operational level, integrating smart systems into daily routines, improving perceived usefulness and security, and enhancing user-friendliness can increase adoption sustainability. Emphasizing data protection education would further build confidence among nursing staff, ensuring effective and enduring implementation of smart elderly care technologies.


Research Limitations: This study had several limitations. The quantitative, self-reported design may not have fully captured actual behaviors and could have introduced social desirability bias. The cross-sectional approach limits understanding of long-term adoption trends, while the model excluded contextual factors such as cultural norms, workforce diversity, and patient influences. Moreover, as the research was conducted within China’s elderly care context, the findings may not be directly generalizable to other cultural or institutional settings.


Future Research: Future studies should adopt mixed-method approaches, integrating qualitative interviews or observations to explore deeper behavioral insights. Longitudinal research is recommended to assess adoption dynamics over time. Expanding comparative analyses across diverse cultural, institutional, and policy environments would enrich the understanding of contextual influences and broaden the applicability of the findings.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Aldabbas, H., Pinnington, A., & Lahrech, A. (2023). The influence of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: The mediating role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 42, 6501–6515. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-021-01992-1

Alexandrou, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2019). A security risk perception model for the adoption of mobile devices in the healthcare industry. Security Journal, 32(4), 410–434. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41284-019-00170-0

Bao, J., Zhou, L., Liu, G., Tang, J., Lu, X., Cheng, C., Jin, Y., & Bai, J. (2022). Current state of care for the elderly in China in the context of an aging population. Bioscience Trends, 16(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2022.01068

Barnoy, S., Soffer, T., Raban, Y., Schwartz-Attias, I., Kusha, M., Wechsler, H., & Warshawski, S. (2025). Emerging technologies in community-based older adult care: The perception of nurses. The Journal of Nursing Research, 33(4), e402. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000687

Biancone, P., Secinaro, S., Marseglia, R., & Calandra, D. (2023). E-health for the future. Managerial perspectives using a multiple case study approach. Technovation, 120, 102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102406

Borges do Nascimento, I. J., Abdulazeem, H. M., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Zapata, T., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2023). The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers’ competencies and health workplace: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(8), e534–e544. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(23)00092-4/fulltext

Brown, K. A., & Mitchell, T. R. (1991). A comparison of just-in-time and batch manufacturing: The role of performance obstacles. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 906–917. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256395

Chang, F., Wang, G., & Gu, Z. (2024). Navigating challenges and opportunities in community-based interventions for promoting active aging: A systematic review of the roles of technology. Innovation in Aging, 8(10), igae077. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae077

Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal Of Management, 41, 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Choi, H., Tak, S. H., Song, Y., & Park, J. A. (2025). Nurses’ perspectives on the adoption of new smart technologies for patient care: Focus group interviews. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 391. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12578-z

Dai, Q., Li, M., Yang, M., Shi, S., Wang, Z., Liao, J., Li, Z., E, W., Tao, L., & Tang, Y.-D. (2025). Attitudes, perceptions, and factors influencing the adoption of AI in health care among medical staff: nationwide cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e75343. https://doi.org/10.2196/75343

Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri, & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption, (pp. 205–219). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2

Dermody, G., Wadsworth, D., El Haddad, M., Prichard, R., Benson, A., Benson, T., & Craswell, A. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: A multi‐method evaluation of nursing readiness for digital health technology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70105

Gaughan, M. R., Kwon, M., Park, E., & Jungquist, C. (2022). Nurses' experience and perception of technology use in practice: A qualitative study using an extended technology acceptance model. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 40(7), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000850

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hussain, A., Zhiqiang, M., Li, M., Jameel, A., Kanwel, S., Ahmad, S., & Ge, B. (2025). The mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on nurses’ intentions to adopt advanced technology. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02648-8

Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Skorková, Z. (2021). Perceived organizational support and work engagement of first-line managers in healthcare–The mediation role of feedback seeking behavior. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 3109–3123. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S326563

Kim, Y.-S., Shin, H., Lee, M., Kim, N.-H., Kim, E.-H., Jung, D., Choi, M., & Choi, K.-H. (2024). Changes in technology acceptance of smart care beds among long-term care workers in Korea. Healthcare, 12(21), 2195. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212195

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Larsman, P., Pousette, A., & Törner, M. (2024). The impact of a climate of perceived organizational support on nurses' well‐being and healthcare‐unit performance: A longitudinal questionnaire study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 80(12), 4921–4932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16188

Li, X.-Y., Li, J., Zhu, N.-L., Luo, L., Zhang, S.-Y., Cheng, W.-W., Li, J.-X., Yu, C., Lu, S.-H., & Zhu, L. (2025). When “Aging” meets “Intelligence”: Smart health cognition and intentions of older adults in rural Western China. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1493376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1493376

Lou, S., & Liu, H. (2023). Awareness, use, and need of smart care for older adults: A comparative study based on a survey in Macao, China. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1135164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1135164

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2025, August 15). National economy maintained a steady development momentum with progress in July. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202508/t20250815_ 1960785.html

Pan, M., & Gao, W. (2021). Determinants of the behavioral intention to use a mobile nursing application by nurses in China. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06244-3

Rajak, M., & Shaw, K. (2021). An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption. Technology in Society, 67, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101800

Rony, M. K. K., Kayesh, I., Bala, S. D., Akter, F., & Parvin, M. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: Exploring perspectives of nursing professionals-A descriptive qualitative study. Heliyon, 10(4), e25718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25718

Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model for the sustainability of higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified research gaps. Sustainability, 14(18), 11389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389

Shan, R., Wang, Z., Ma, C., Guo, C., & Cui, N. (2024). Acceptance of the internet-based sharing nursing service among caregivers of elderly with chronic diseases. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 667. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02286-0

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2800121

Won, D., Chiu, W., & Byun, H. (2023). Factors influencing consumer use of a sport-branded app: The technology acceptance model integrating app quality and perceived enjoyment. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(5), 1112–1133. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2021-0709

Zhang, Q., Li, M., & Wu, Y. (2020). Smart home for elderly care: Development and challenges in China. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), 318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01737-y

Zhao, Y., Sazlina, S.-G., Rokhani, F. Z., Chinna, K., Su, J., & Chew, B.-H. (2024). The expectations and acceptability of a smart nursing home model among Chinese older adults: a mixed methods study. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01676-0