From Online Interns to On-Site Educators: A Phenomenological Study of Filipino Teachers’ Professional Identity Reconfigurations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim/Purpose: This study explored the lived experiences of Filipino teachers who completed their pre-service teaching internships entirely through online modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic and later transitioned to on-site teaching when schools resumed face-to-face instruction. Specifically, the study sought to understand how these teachers perceived the transition from virtual practicum environments to physical classrooms, how they navigated the challenges associated with on-site teaching, and how their professional identities evolved as they adapted to these new professional realities.
Introduction/Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted teacher education programs worldwide. As schools closed and learning shifted to remote environments, teacher education institutions were compelled to redesign pre-service teaching internships to be conducted online. In these virtual settings, pre-service teachers delivered lessons via video conferencing, interacted with learners remotely, and relied extensively on digital tools to facilitate instruction. Although these arrangements ensured the continuity of teacher preparation during the pandemic, they also altered the nature of the practicum experience. Opportunities to observe student behavior directly, practice classroom management in physical spaces, and engage with school communities in person became limited. Existing research has documented the experiences of preservice teachers during online internships, highlighting challenges related to technology integration, instructional delivery, and student engagement. However, relatively little attention has been given to the experiences of teachers who trained entirely in online environments and subsequently entered traditional classroom settings as professional educators. In the Philippines, the return to full face-to-face instruction during the 2022–2023 School Year created a significant transition for teachers who had completed their internships online. These teachers were suddenly required to manage physical classrooms, interact directly with students, and respond to the complex social dynamics of face-to-face teaching. Because the early stages of a teaching career play a critical role in shaping professional identity, examining how teachers experience and interpret this transition provides valuable insights for teacher education institutions seeking to prepare future educators for evolving instructional contexts.
Methodology: This study employed a qualitative research design grounded in transcendental phenomenology, guided by Moustakas's framework, to explore teachers' lived experiences of transitioning from online pre-service internships to on-site teaching. Criterion purposive sampling was used to recruit five teachers who had completed their pre-service teaching internships entirely through online modalities during the 2021–2022 academic year and subsequently began on-site teaching during the 2022–2023 academic year. The participants, aged 22 to 25 years, included three female and two male teachers working in junior high school, senior high school, and higher education institutions in Tacurong City, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews conducted via an online conferencing platform. Following Moustakas's phenomenological approach, the researchers engaged in bracketing (epoché), repeatedly reviewed the transcripts, identified significant statements through horizonalization, clustered these into meaning units, and synthesized thematic descriptions to capture the essence of participants' shared experiences. Member checking and systematic documentation of the analytic procedures were employed to ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings.
Findings: Analysis of participants’ narratives revealed several interconnected themes that illuminate how teachers experienced the transition from online preparation to on-site teaching. Participants described the transition as anticipated but staggering, indicating that while they expected challenges, the realities of managing physical classrooms and responding to student behavior were more demanding than they had imagined. Teachers also reported redefining their professional horizons as they adjusted their expectations and gradually expanded their instructional approaches in response to the dynamics of face-to-face teaching. Another theme, putting up with the shadow of doubt, reflected participants’ feelings of uncertainty and self-questioning as they navigated unfamiliar classroom situations and assessed their readiness to meet the expectations of on-site teaching. Despite these difficulties, participants described actively bridging the online and offline teaching rift by drawing from their online teaching experiences and adapting those practices to suit the needs of physical classrooms. Teachers also emphasized nurturing the potential of technology to enhance student engagement, demonstrating that digital tools remained a meaningful component of their instructional strategies even within traditional classroom environments. Put differently, teachers came to see themselves as hybrid and adaptive pedagogues who combined elements of online and traditional instruction, technology-enabled educators who intentionally integrated digital tools into classroom learning, and reflective practitioners who continuously evaluated and refined their teaching practices through experience and reflection.
Contribution/Impact on Society: These findings contribute to ongoing discussions on post-pandemic education by illustrating how teachers trained in online environments adapted to professional practice in physical classrooms. The study highlights the importance of preparing future teachers for flexible instructional contexts that integrate both digital and face-to-face modalities.
Recommendations: Teacher education institutions should strengthen pre-service preparation by incorporating authentic classroom management experiences, structured reflective practice, and blended teaching strategies that integrate digital and face-to-face instruction. Schools should provide comprehensive induction and mentoring programs to support teachers transitioning from online preparation to on-site teaching.
Research Limitations: This study involved a small number of participants from a single geographic location, which may limit the transferability of the findings to other educational contexts.
Future Research: Future studies may involve larger and more diverse samples across different regions or educational systems and may examine how teachers’ professional identities continue to evolve as educators gain greater experience teaching in both online and on-site environments.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Asia-Pacific International University reserve exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
References
Anderson, P. J., England, D. E., & Barber, L. D. (2022). Preservice teacher perceptions of the online teaching and learning environment during COVID-19 lockdown in the UAE. Education Sciences, 12(12), 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120911
Back, M., Golembeski, K., Gutierrez, A., Macko, T., Miller, S., & Palletier, D. L. (2021). “We were told that the content we delivered was not as important”: Disconnect and disparities in world language student teaching during COVID-19. System, 103, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102679
Bansawan, R. G., Calunsag, A. C., Benaning, P. M. A., Castillo, M. S. D. F., & Ehimplar, M. A. C. (2022). Experiences of the NDMU pre-service teachers during their online teaching internship. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education. 3(Special Issue), 116–134. https://www.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/166
Baylan, S. L. (2019). A qualitative study of teacher interns’ experiences of pair teaching during teaching practice sessions. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 5(6), 197–205. https://www.ijirmf.com/volume-5-issue-6-published-in-june-2019/
Brown, D. R. (2020). The effects of school leaders’ support on teachers’ integration of technology in Catholic schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edsc_etds/72
Chen, J. A., Stevens, C., Wong, S., & Liu, C. H. (2019). Psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses among U.S. college students: A comparison by race and ethnicity. Psychiatric Services, 70(6), 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800388
Cheng, S. L., Lü, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020). Understanding teacher technology integration from expectancy-value perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103062
Choi, H., Chung, S. Y., & Ko, J. (2021). Rethinking teacher education policy in ICT: Lessons from emergency remote teaching (ERT) during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Korea. Sustainability, 13(10), 5480. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105480
Cobb, D. J., Harlow, A., & Clark, L. (2018). Examining the teacher identity–agency relationship through legitimate peripheral participation: A longitudinal investigation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1480010
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ramot, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges: Teacher education in Israel in the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, 46(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799708
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadık, O., Şendurur, E., & Şendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Ed.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 645–672). Springer International Handbooks of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_24
Fallah, R., Chalak, A., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2022). Professional identity reflection of Iranian EFL instructors in e-teaching: Focus on achievement orientation theory. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 10 (42), 135–148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361910611
Gómez-Carrasco, C. J., Rodríguez-Medina, J., Chaparro-Sáinz, Á., & Monteagudo-Fernández, J. (2021). Teaching approaches and profile analysis: An exploratory study with trainee history teachers. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402110591. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211059174
González-Calvo, G., Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2021). The virtual teaching of physical education in times of pandemic. European Physical Education Review, 28(1), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211031533
Hamilton, E. R., & Margot, K. C. (2019). Preservice teachers’ community-based field experiences. Frontiers in Education, 4, 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00115
Harvey, W. S., Osman, S., & Tourky, M. (2021). Building internal reputation from organisational values. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00109-x
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
Hernando-Malipot, M. (2022, August 11). Philippines schools to open SY 2022–2023 with face-to-face classes. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2022/08/11/face-to-face-classes-will-be-mandatory-for-public-private-schools-this-sy-deped/?amp
Izadinia, M. (2015). A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.08.003
Jin, M. (2022). Preservice teachers’ online teaching experiences during COVID-19. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(2), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01316-3
Jonker, H., März, V., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teacher educators’ professional identity under construction: The transition from teaching face-to-face to a blended curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.016
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: How teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/naturalistic-inquiry/book842
Mante-Estacio, M. J., & Ugalingan, G. B. (2018). Pre-service ESL teachers’ reflections on their feelings toward action research writing. TESOL International Journal, 13(3), 45–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247332
McMahon, S. D., Anderman, E. M., Astor, R. A., Espelage, D. L., Martinez, A., Reddy, L. A., & Worrell, F. C. (2022). Violence against educators and school personnel: Crisis during COVID (Technical Report). American Psychological Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED622134
Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when, and how. Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006. 00684.x
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nazari, M., & Seyri, H. (2021). Covidentity: Examining transitions in teacher identity construction from personal to online classes. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1920921
Noguera, J. S., & McCluskey, K. (2016). A case study of early career secondary teachers’ perceptions of their preparedness for teaching: Lessons from Australia and Spain. Teacher Development, 21(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1204353
Park, C. L., Russell, B. S., Fendrich, M., Finkelstein-Fox, L., Hutchison, M., & Becker, J. (2020). Americans’ COVID-19 stress, coping, and adherence to CDC guidelines. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(8), 2296–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9
Pepito, G. M. (2022). Student teaching internship amidst the pandemic: The lived experiences of early childhood education student interns. Multicultural Education, 8(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6373538
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2015). From the classroom to the keyboard: How seven teachers created their online teacher identities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1814
Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 732–755). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938690
Scheeler, M. C., Budin, S., & Markelz, A. (2016). The role of teacher preparation in promoting evidence-based practice in schools. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14(2), 171–187. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1118433.pdf
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (Higher Education Series). Jossey-Bass.
Stamatis, P. J. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on teaching and classroom management: Thoughts based on current situation and the role of communication. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.1.48
Suarez, V., & McGrath, J. (2022). Teacher professional identity: How to develop and support it in times of change. OECD Education Working Papers, 267. https://doi.org/10.1787/b19f5af7-en
Sung, C. C. M. (2016). Experiences and identities in ELF communication. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 26(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.26.2.07sun
Tarrayo, V. N., & Anudin, A. G. (2021). Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: Perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703
Tondeur, J., Howard, S. K., & Yang, J. (2021). One-size does not fit all: Towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to preparing future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Ugalingan, G., Edjan, D., & Valdez, P. N. (2021). Online internship experiences among pre-service ESL teachers in the Philippines: Challenges and opportunities. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(3), 1–13. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume25/ej99/ej99int/
Utami, T., Supiani, & Dayu, A. T. (2021). Pre-service EFL teachers’ online teaching challenges at the teaching practicum program amidst COVID-19 outbreak and how they cope with them: A narrative case study. Proceedings of the Islamic University of Kalimantan, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.31602/.v0i0.6713
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & Brummelhuis, A. T. (2011). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
2011.00453.x
Yıldırım, B. (2021). Preschool education in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01153-w
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2014). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771136