The Influence of Social Media Marketing Management, Risk Perception, and Perceived Usefulness on the Performance of Tourism Businesses in Thailand

Main Article Content

Fungkiat Mahiphan
Sukanya Duanguppama
Titirut Rungkaew
Mayurada Mahiphan

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This study investigated how Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Risk (PR) influenced the Business Performance (BP) of tourism enterprises in Thailand, with Social Media Marketing Management (SMMM) positioned as a mediating mechanism. By integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Resource-Based View (RBV), the research sought to explain how entrepreneurs’ cognitive perceptions of digital technologies were transformed into organizational capabilities and, ultimately, performance outcomes. The study specifically investigated whether SMMM functions as a strategic capability that links Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Risk of digital marketing to improved Business Performance in the context of tourism small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).


Introduction/Background: The tourism industry has long been a significant contributor to Thailand’s economic growth, employment, and regional development. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed structural weaknesses among tourism SMEs, particularly in digital readiness and resilience. As travel declined and uncertainty increased, tourism enterprises relied more heavily on digital platforms to maintain visibility, engage customers, and rebuild trust. Consequently, social media marketing has evolved into a strategic managerial function. Despite evidence that social media marketing enhances firm performance, limited research explains how entrepreneurs’ perceptions of digital technologies influence effective social media management and business outcomes in developing economies.


Methodology: In this study, a quantitative design was adopted using survey data from 335 registered tourism entrepreneurs across seven regions of Thailand. Respondents were business owners and senior managers involved in strategic and digital marketing decisions. Data was collected through an online questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Measurement items were adapted from established studies and validated through expert review and pilot testing. Data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, with reliability, validity, and common method variance assessed to ensure robust results.


Findings: The empirical results provided several important findings. First, Perceived Usefulness was found to exert a strong and significant positive effect on both Social Media Marketing Management and Business Performance. This indicated that when tourism entrepreneurs recognize the operational and strategic benefits of digital technologies, they were more likely to adopt structured SMMM practices and achieve superior performance outcomes. Second, Perceived Risk did not have a direct effect on Business Performance; however, it showed a significant positive influence on SMMM. This suggests that higher levels of perceived risk motivate entrepreneurs to manage social media more systematically as a means of reducing uncertainty, enhancing transparency, and building customer trust. Third, Social Media Marketing Management had a significant positive effect on business performance, confirming its role as a critical driver of competitiveness in the tourism sector. Mediation analysis further revealed that SMMM partially mediated the relationship between Perceived Usefulness and Business Performance, whereas it fully mediated the relationship between Perceived Risk and Business Performance. These findings underscore the central role of SMMM as a mechanism that converts cognitive perceptions into tangible organizational outcomes.


Contributions/Impact on Society: This study advances the literature by integrating TAM and RBV in the context of social media marketing. It demonstrates that digital technology perceptions (PU, PR) must be understood alongside managerial processes (SMMM) to explain performance outcomes in SMEs. By highlighting the dual roles of PU and PR, and the central mediating mechanism of SMMM, the study provides a nuanced understanding of how SMEs in emerging markets may leverage digital tools to sustain competitiveness in tourism.


Recommendations: Based on the findings, tourism entrepreneurs are encouraged to move beyond ad hoc social media usage and invest in systematic social media marketing management practices, including content strategy, customer engagement, and performance monitoring. Policymakers and industry stakeholders should support SMEs through targeted training programs that enhance digital competencies and risk management skills. Such initiatives can strengthen the strategic use of social media and amplify its contribution to business performance.


Research Limitations: As with all empirical studies, this research has limitations that present opportunities for future inquiry. The study focused on Thai tourism SMEs, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other sectors or cultural contexts. Future research could conduct cross-country comparisons or explore variations across industries to assess the robustness of the model. In addition, this study employed a cross-sectional design; longitudinal studies are recommended to capture how perceptions of usefulness and risk, along with SMMM practices, evolve over time. Finally, future work could incorporate additional variables, such as entrepreneurial orientation, digital literacy, or customer trust, to enrich the explanatory power of the mode


Future Research: Future research should employ longitudinal designs to track the developing impact of digital trends. Testing more moderators, such as digital literacy and technological infrastructure, across diverse tourism sectors would enhance generalizability. Further studies could also focus on the role of artificial intelligence in social media marketing management to determine its specific influence on long-term business sustainability.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Agah, J. J., Ocheni, C. A., Ezugwu, I. J., Nnaji, A. D., Nnenanya, G. C., & Eke, J. (2024). Application of item objective congruence index (IOC-index) for proper alignment of 2020 physics WASSCE items with objectives and content. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 57–63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383948597 Application_of_Item_Objective_Congruence_Index_IOC-Index_for_Proper_Alignment_of_2020_Physics_ WASSCE_Items_with_Objectives_and_Content

Ahani, A., Rahim, N. Z. Ab., & Nilashi, M. (2017). Forecasting social CRM adoption in SMEs: A combined SEM-neural network method. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032

Ancillai, C., Terho, H., Cardinali, S., & Pascucci, F. (2019). Advancing social media driven sales research: Establishing conceptual foundations for B-to-B social selling. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.002

Armutcu, B., Tan, A., Amponsah, M., Parida, S., & Ramkissoon, H. (2023). Tourist behaviour: The role of digital marketing and social media. Acta Psychologica , 240, 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104025

Bartoloni, S., & Ancillai, C. (2024). Twenty years of social media marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 26(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12360

Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016). Social big data: Recent achievements and new challenges. Information Fusion, 28, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005

Borah, A., Banerjee, S., Lin, Y.-T., Jain, A., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2020). Improvised marketing interventions in social media. Journal of Marketing, 84(2), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919899383

Brink, T. (2017). B2B SME management of antecedents to the application of social media. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.02.007

Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2021). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Fakfare, P., Lee, J.-S., & Han, H. (2022). Thailand tourism: A systematic review. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 39(2), 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2022.2061674

Fakfare, P., Manosuthi, N., Lee, J.-S., Lee, S.-M., & Han, H. (2024). Investigating the formation of ethical animal-related tourism behaviors: A self-interest and pro-social theoretic approach. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(3), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241229237

Garg, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2017). Employee service innovation: The roles of leader–member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2015-0060

Guner, H., & Acarturk, C. (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: A comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.

Hameed, W. U., Nisar, Q. A., & Wu, H.-C. (2021). Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms’ open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745

Han, M. S., Ma, S., Wang, Y., & Tian, Q. (2023). Impact of technology-enabled product eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. Technovation, 128, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102853

Hanaysha, J. R. (2022). Impact of social media marketing features on consumer's purchase decision in the fast-food industry: Brand trust as a mediator. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100102

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hsu, C.-L. & Lin, J. C.-C. (2023). Understanding the user satisfaction and loyalty of customer service chatbots. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103211

Ibrahim, B., & Aljarah, A. (2023). The role of social media marketing activities in driving self–brand connection and user engagement behavior on Instagram: A moderation–mediation approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2022-0452

Ibrahim, B., Aljarah, A., & Sawaftah, D. (2021). Linking social media marketing activities to revisit intention through brand trust and brand loyalty on the coffee shop Facebook pages: Exploring sequential mediation mechanism. Sustainability, 13(4), 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042277

Jacobson, J., Gruzd, A., & Hernández-García, Á. (2020). Social media marketing: Who is watching the watchers? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.001

Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212

Kamalul Ariffin, S., Mohan, T., & Goh, Y.-N. (2018). Influence of consumers’ perceived risk on consumers’ online purchase intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2017-0100

Kero, C. A., & Bogale, A. T. (2023). A systematic review of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities of firms and future research avenues. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(10), 3137–3154. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181016

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021). Social media marketing strategy: Definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3

Magano, J., Silva, C., Figueiredo, C., Vitória, A., Nogueira, T., & Pimenta Dinis, M. A. (2020). Generation Z: Fitting project management soft skills competencies—A mixed-method approach. Education Sciences, 10(7), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070187

McGahan, A. M. (2021). Integrating insights from the resource-based view of the firm into the new stakeholder theory. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1734–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320987282

Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2017). Opportunities for innovation in social media analytics. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12405

Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., & Roh, Y. (2022). Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework. Buildings, 12(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090

Nitzl, C., & Chin, W. W. (2017). The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research. Journal of Management Control, 28(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-017-0249-6

Ozdemir, S., de Arroyabe, J. C. F., Sena, V., & Gupta, S. (2023). Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113955

Park, D. Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Determinants of intentions to use digital mental healthcare content among university students, faculty, and staff: Motivation, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and parasocial interaction with AI chatbot. Sustainability, 15(1), 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010872

Pongsakornrungsilp, S., Pongsakornrungsilp, P., Kumar, V., & Maswongssa, B. (2021). The art of survival: Tourism businesses in Thailand recovering from COVID-19 through brand management. Sustainability, 13(12), 6690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126690

Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658

Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027

Richter, N. F., Schubring, S., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2243–2267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0638

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com

Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M., Cabeza-Ramírez, L. J., Muñoz-Fernández, G., & Fuentes-García, F. J. (2021). Impact of the perceived risk from COVID-19 on intention to travel. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1829571

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Shen, C.-w., Luong, T.-h., Ho, J.-t., & Djailani, I. (2020). Social media marketing of IT service companies: Analysis using a concept-linking mining approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.014

Varadarajan, R. (2020). Customer information resources advantage, marketing strategy and business performance: A market resources-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.003

Varela-Neira, C., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Camoiras-Rodriguez, Z. (2023). Social media marketing system: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Internet Research, 33(4), 1302–1330. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-06-2021-0393

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wang, Z., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Digitalization effect on business performance: Role of business model innovation. Sustainability, 15(11), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119020

Wibowo, A., Chen, S.-C., Wiangin, U., Ma, Y., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2021). Customer behavior as an outcome of social media marketing: The role of social media marketing activity and customer experience. Sustainability, 13(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010189

Yen, Y.-S. (2023). Channel integration affects usage intention in food delivery platform services: The mediating effect of perceived value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2021-0372

Yoopetch, C., Kongarchapatara, B., & Nimsai, S. (2023). Tourism forecasting using the Delphi method and implications for sustainable tourism development. Sustainability, 15(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010126

Zeng, B., & Gerritsen, R. (2014). What do we know about social media in tourism? A review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 10, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.01.001

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Zhu, C., Fong, L. H. N., Liu, C. Y. N., & Song, H. (2023). When social media meets destination marketing: The mediating role of attachment to social media influencer. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(4), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2022-0119