Study of English Vocabulary Learning’s Ability of Mathayomsuksa 1 Students Using Jigsaw Task
Keywords:
he English Vocabulary Learning’s Ability, Jigsaw Task, Jigsaw Task, he Students’ attitude towards teaching English vocabulary learning using Jigsaw TaskAbstract
The purposes of this study were to study and compare English vocabulary learning ability using Jigsaw Task of Mathayomsuksa 1 students before and after the instruction, and to study students’ attitude towards teaching English vocabulary learning using Jigsaw Task. The sample consisted of 39 students of Mathayomsuksa 1 students at Phuwiengwittayakhom School, Khonkaen Province, in the first semester of the academic year 2018. They were selected by purposive selection. The design of this research was a one group pretest-posttest design. The research instruments included 10 lesson plans, an English vocabulary learning ability test, and an attitude questionnaire. The findings were as follows;
- The students’ pretest and posttest mean scores on English speaking ability were 9.23 or 30.77 percent and 22.31 or 74.36 percent respectively. The posttest score was higher than the criteria of 70 percent and it was significantly higher than that of the pretest at the .01 level.
- The students’ attitude towards teaching English vocabulary learning using Jigsaw task was at a good level.
Keywords: The English Vocabulary Learning’s Ability, Jigsaw Task, The Students’ attitude towards teaching English vocabulary learning using Jigsaw Task
References
กรุงเทพฯ: องค์การรับส่งสินค้าและพัสดุภัณฑ์.
_______. (2553). คู่มือการจัดการเรียนรู้กลุ่มสาระภาษาต่างประเทศ. กรุงเทพฯ: องค์การรับส่ง
สินค้าและพัสดุภัณฑ์.
เรวดี หิรัญ (2533). การเปรียบเทียบผลสัมฤทธิ์ในการอ่านเพื่อความเข้าใจภาษาอังกฤษของ
นักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 ที่เรียนจากการตั้งคำถามจากเรื่องที่อ่านเองและโดยการ
ย่อเรื่องที่อ่าน. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาครุศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชามัธยมศึกษา บัณฑิต
วิทยาลัย จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish
Interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 120-136.
Cross, D. (1995). A practical handbook of language teaching. London: Phonix ELT
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and in
implications. New York: Longman Group Limited.
Likert, R. (1932). A teaching for the measurement of attitude. Achieves of
Psychology, 140(1), 1-55.
Nation, I. S. P.. (2006). Teaching Vocabulary. ASIAN EFL Journal. Retrieved
November 7, 2018, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/sept_50_pn.pndf.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Task and Language Learning: Integrating
Theory and Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters
Richard, J. C., & Renandya, W.A. (2005). Methodology in language teaching. An
anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge.
Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice.
New York: McGraw Hill.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Edinburgh: Longman.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Detail published in Saeng Isan Journal is opinion and responsibility of the authors, and it is not relevant with the jouranl. Besides, the authors must certify that the original manuscript is not in the process to publish in other journal or used to publish in other journals. If the authors use paragraph, picture or tables from others, the athours must refer to the original sources.
