Strengthening the Oral Communicative Competence of Senior High School Students through Inquiry-Based and Content-Focused Approaches

Authors

  • Karen Rose A. Serrania Department of Education Lourdes College
  • Revina O. Mendoza Department of Education Lourdes College

Keywords:

constructivist strategy, content-focused, active learning, oral communicative competence

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of inquiry-based and content-focused approaches on the oral communicative competence among the 64 Senior High School students of a public high school in the Division of El Salvador City, Philippines for the SY 2016-2017. A teacher made English language speaking tests was administered to assess the students’ English speaking ability. The test consisted of six items (four mini-guided-situation and two picture-description test items) which reflected the current issues senior high school students were familiar with. Before the intervention, the students from the inquiry-based group were in the “Developing” level for the following competencies: relevance, organization, vocabulary and non-verbal cues and improved to “Approaching Proficiency” after the intervention. With the students exposed to content-focused approach, there were minimal increases in the students’ performance for relevance, organization and non-verbal cues after the intervention. Furthermore, students exposed to inquiry-based approach yielded a significant difference in their pretest and posttest in the said competencies except for vocabulary skill. Students who were exposed to content-focused approach showed no significant difference in their pretest and posttest ratings in oral communication skills. Moreover, there were significant differences in the mean improvement of the two groups in their oral communication skills with the students exposed to inquiry-based approach showing higher mean.

References

Agbatogun, A. (2013). Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: clickers or communicative approach? University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ProQuest Central.Retrieved June 30, 2016.

Beach, R. & Myers Jamie (2001). Inquiry-based Instruction: engaging students in life and literature. Teacher’s College, Columbia University, New York & London

DeBourgh, G. A. (2008). Use of “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse education in Practice, 8(2), 76-87.

Colwell, A. (2003). An Exploration of Inquiry in the English Classroom. Google scholar. https://ed.psu.edu/englishpds/inquiry/projects/Colwell.pdf. Retrieved August 15, 2016

Cuban, L. (1999). How teachers taught (2nd ed.). NY: Teachers College Press.

Dong Wei, et al (2015).Research on cooperative-based listening and speaking English teaching mode and application for fuzzy mathematics.Institute of Technology, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.Proquest Central.Retrieved December 2, 2016.

Dykes, B. (2007). Grammar for everyone: practical tools for learning and teaching. Australia. ACER Press of Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. Books. google.com

Emerson, T. L. N.,& Taylor, B. A. (2004). Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principle of microeconomics course. Southern Economics Journal, 70, 672-693.

Huffman, S. (2011).Using mobile technologies for synchronous CMC to develop L2 oral proficiency. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 122-129). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

Johnson, G. M. (2005). Student alienation, academic achievement, and webCT use. Educational Technology and Society, 8, 179-189.

Lucas, S. (2011) The art of public speaking (11th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Education

Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin.

McCornack, S. (2014). Interpersonal communication and you: An introduction. New York, NY: Bedford/ St. Martin’s.

Met, M. (2000). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. NFLC Report. Washington, D.C.: National Foreign Language Center. Retrieved from http://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/principles/decisions.html

Oluwole, D. A. (2008).The impact of mother tongue on students’ achievement in English language in junior secondary certificate examination in western Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 17(1), 41 – 49.

Onukaogu, C. E. (2001, July). Second language teaching and learning: The Nigerian experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Washington, DC.

Perkins, D. (2000). Educational Leadership, v57 n3 p6-11 Nov 2000 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ597073.Retrieved on January 12, 2017.

Rekrut, D. M. (2002). Inquiry-Based English Instruction: engaging students in life and literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy; Dec 2002; 4; ProQuest Central.Pg. 369. Retrieved July 30, 2016.

Sims, R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87–103

Sipacio, P. & Balgos, A. (2016). Oral communication in context for senior high school. C & E Publishing, Inc. 839 EDSA, South Triangle, Quezon City

Tabbers, H.K., & de Koeijer, B. (2010).Learner control in animated multimedia instruction. Instructional Science, 38, 441-453.

Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic Inquiry, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

How to Cite

Serrania, K. R. A., & Mendoza, R. O. (2018). Strengthening the Oral Communicative Competence of Senior High School Students through Inquiry-Based and Content-Focused Approaches. ASEAN Journal of Education, 4(1), 53–74. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJE/article/view/180410

Issue

Section

Research Articles