A Review of Blended Learning Implementation in the English Language Classroom
Keywords:
Blended learning, Online learning, English language teachingAbstract
Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, technology has played a vital role in instruction at most educational institutions. With the help of technology, the instruction can be considered as being implemented with the Blended Learning (BL) approach, as widely done during school closures due to the pandemic spread, as mandated by the government. This article presents various definitions of blended learning (BL) and different BL models implemented in three different contexts, to provide some ‘valuable and unique insight’ into BL with ‘wider implications’, through the review of both theoretical and practical implementation of blended learning. According to the reviews of relevant studies and three particular BL context, BL instruction has many advantages, including increasing learning flexibility, learning motivation and developing four language skills, enabling teachers to offer immediate feedback in assessment and the ability to manipulate content, as well as ensuring all-time availability of lesson content and larger amounts of content for learners’ self-study. In addition, BL is also found to be beneficial for enhancing higher learning outcomes, promoting communication between teachers and learners and constructing knowledge and skills among teachers and learners. In other words, it is possible to implement BL approach in various instructional contexts and content areas, particularly in English language courses with both general and specific content and language skills, as in the classes of reading skill, translation and literature mentioned in this article. Besides, BL instruction also highlights unexpected situations such as a paradox of the flexibility of content and its manipulation by teachers, learners’ less enthusiasm in communication due to their learning autonomy, impeded online communication due to complication of online tools, platforms and systems and lack of IT literacy and also reverse results of seem-to-be problems among teachers and learners. In conclusion, no technological tools or instruction can claim to be the most effective for blended learning instruction, as discussed in this article. However, the primary key to enhance learning is, in fact, the appropriate blend on both technology and instruction that mostly suits each learning context and students’ needs.
References
Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students' language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 220-229.
Bataineh, R. F., & Mayyas, M. B. (2017). The utility of blended learning in EFL reading and grammar: A case for Moodle. Teaching English with Technology, 17(3), 35-49.
Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Buran, A., & Evseeva, A. (2015). Prospects of blended learning implementation at technical university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 177-182.
Chen, S., & Lu, Y. (2013, June). The negative effects and control of blended learning in university. In 2013 the International Conference on Education Technology and Information.
Chomchaiya, C. (2014). An investigation into the development of English language reading comprehension among Thai undergraduate students using an online blended learning approach. [Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University]. Curtin University databased.
Driscoll, M. (2003). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. Retrieved 2020, August, 10, from http://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf
Erben, T., Ban, R., & Castañeda, M. (2008). Teaching English language learners through technology. New York: Routledge. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Graham, C.R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003) Blended Learning Environment: A Review of the Research Literature. Unpublished Manuscript, Provo, UT.
Graziano, K.J., & Feher, L. (2016). A dual placement approach to online student teaching. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 495–513.
Hancock, S., & Wong, T. (2012). Blended Learning. Retrieved 2012, July 31, from http://sites.wiki.ubc.ca/etec510/Blended_Learning#cite_note-3
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning (Innosight Institute white paper). Retrieved 2012, October 12, from http://www.inno-sightinstitute.org/media-room/publications/education-publications/the-rise-of-k-12-blended-learning/
Kardkarnklai, U. (2015). Hybrid learning design and effective components of e-learning in English writing course. Silpakorn University Journal, 35(1), 1-31.
Kerres, M., & Witt, C. D. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 101-114. Khan, B. (1997). Web-based instruction: What is it and why is it? In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 5-18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Klímová, B., & Pikhart, M. (2019, September). Blended learning approach in English language teaching–Its benefits, challenges, and perspectives. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 293-298). Springer, Cham.
Matukhin, D., & Zhitkova, E. (2015). Implementing blended learning technology in higher professional education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 183-188.
Nilsook, P., & Wannapirun, P. (2012). Blended e-learning activities for the Information and Innovation Management course: Its outcomes of graduate students at Bangkok-Thonburi University. The Proceedings of International e-Learning Conference 2012 (IEC2012) “Smart Innovations in Education and Lifelong Learning”, June 14-15, IMPACT, Muang Thong Thani, Thailand. Retrieved 2016, January 10, from http://support.thaicyberu.go.th/proceeding/proceedingIEC2012.pdf
Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council. (2020). Major changes in Thai education anticipated after the COVID-19 pandemic (Online). Retrieved 2020, August 10, from https://www.nxpo.or.th/th/en/4841/
Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C., & Graham, C. R. (2013). Blended learning: Research perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge Publication.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of online learning and teaching, 9(2), 271-288.
Prachachart.net. (2020). Regular online learning: OBEC launching 3 forms for schools to choose. Retrieved 2020, August 2, from https://www.prachachat.net/education/news-466468.
Shand, K., & Glassett Farrelly, S. (2017). Using blended teaching to teach blended learning: Lessons learned from preservice teachers in an instructional methods course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 5–30.
Shih, R. C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 884-897.
Shih, R. C. (2011). Can web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845.
Simasathiansophon, N. (2014). A perspective on blendedlearning approach through Course Management System: Thailand’s case study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(2), 172-175.
Wansaman, W. (2015). Effects of using facebook as a medium for teaching esp reading for beginners. The degree of Master of Arts in teaching of English as an International language Prince of Songkla University. Retrieved July 10, 2020, from https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/bitstream/2016/10524/1/400851.pdf
Yalavaç G., & Samur Y. (2016). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of after school online course. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 147-162.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1 All articles will undergo a formal peer-review. A panel of experts from within or without the university will examine the article; approval from a minimum of two experts is required for publication. Revisions posed by the experts must be completed by the research prior to publication.
2 Once published in the ASEAN Journal of Education, the article becomes intellectual property of Suan Dusit University. Duplication, in full or part, requires permission from Suan Dusit University.
3 Excluding errors incurred during printing, author(s) are responsible for the content of their articles.