The Impact of Nonlinear Learning on Cognitive Load in Student Rock Climbers: A Comparison of Theoretical and Practical Tasks

Authors

  • HaoHua Dong Faculty of Sports Science, Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences, Chengdu, 610401 China
  • LeeHsing Lu Faculty of Graduate School, Assumption University of Thailand, Bangkok, 10240 Thailand

Keywords:

Cognitive load, Knowledge acquisition, Nonlinear learning, Sports education

Abstract

This study investigated the comparative effects of nonlinear and linear pedagogical approaches on theoretical knowledge acquisition and practical sport climbing performance. A total of 157 university students were randomly assigned to either a nonlinear or linear learning condition. Theoretical knowledge was measured using a standardized test, practical skills were evaluated through International Federation of Sport Climbing (IFSC) competition scoring, and cognitive load was assessed using the Cognitive Load Scale. Results from a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that participants in the nonlinear learning environment achieved significantly higher theoretical knowledge, F(1, 198) = 26.43, p < .01, and demonstrated improved practical climbing performance, F(1, 198) = 9.30, p < .01. Correlation analyses revealed positive associations between nonlinear environments and germane load for theoretical tasks (r = .179, p = .0028) and practical tasks (r = .358, p < .01). A negative correlation between knowledge application and learning environment (r = -.206, p = .001) suggested that nonlinear learning more effectively supports higher-order application skills. Nonlinear environments were also linked to increased germane load (r = .179, p = .0028) and reduced extraneous load (r = -.182, p = .001). Overall, findings indicate that nonlinear learning enhances both theoretical and practical outcomes through greater cognitive engagement and personalization. Educators are encouraged to integrate nonlinear elements into instructional design, and future research should examine these impacts longitudinally across diverse subjects.

References

Asakawa, D., & Sakamoto, M. (2019). Characteristics of counter-movements in sport climbing: A comparison between experienced climbers and beginners. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 31(4), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.349

Blakely, M. J., Smith, S. L., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2021). The impact of cognitive load on climbing and climbing on cognitive performance. Applied Ergonomics, 94, 103413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103413

Brünken, R., Seufert, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Measuring Cognitive Load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 181–202). Cambridge University Press.

Chow, J. Y., Button, C., Lee, M. C. Y., Morris, C., & Shuttleworth, R. (2023). Advice from "pracademics" of how to apply ecological dynamics theory to practice design. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1192332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1192332

Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., & Seifert, L. (2021). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in supporting the design of modified games in junior sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744814

Draper, N., Dickson, T., Fryer, S., & Blackwell, G. (2011). Performance differences for intermediate rock climbers who successfully and unsuccessfully attempted an indoor sport climbing route. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2011.11868564

Ericsson, K. A. (2020). Towards a science of the acquisition of expert performance in sports: Clarifying the differences between deliberate practice and other types of practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1688618

He, C., Ye, L., Sulaimani, H. J., & Hu, W. (2022). Training method of sports athletes using the nonlinear system of moving human body competitive ability. Fractals, 30(02), 2240093. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x2240093x

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2010). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_4

Lee, M. C., Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Tan, C. W., & Button, C. (2014). Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PLoS One, 9(8), e104744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104744

Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1

Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, T., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001

Machado, J. C., Barreira, D., Galatti, L., Chow, J. Y., Garganta, J., & Scaglia, A. J. (2018). Enhancing learning in the context of Street football: a case for Nonlinear Pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552674

Maciejczyk, M., Michailov, M. L., Wiecek, M., Szymura, J., Rokowski, R., Szygula, Z., & Beneke, R. (2021). Climbing-specific exercise tests: Energy system contributions and relationships with sport performance. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 787902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.787902

Macnamara, B. N., & Maitra, M. (2019). The role of deliberate practice in expert performance: revisiting Ericsson, Krampe & Tesch-Romer (1993). Royal Society Open Science, 6(8), 190327. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190327

Orth, D., Davids, K., Chow, J. Y., Brymer, E., & Seifert, L. (2018). Behavioral repertoire influences the rate and nature of learning in climbing: Implications for individualized learning design in preparation for extreme sports participation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00949

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_1

Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2

Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2015). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870

Schmidt, H. G., & Mamede, S. (2020). How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(5), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10011-0

Shapiro, R. (2008). Ondansetron for the treatment of nausea associated with altitude sickness. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 19(4), 317–318. https://doi.org/10.1580/07-weme-le-176.1

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In J. Sweller (Ed.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 71–85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_6

Vasile, A. I., Stanescu, M., Pelin, F., & Bejan, R. (2022). Cognitive factors that predict on-sight and red-point performance in sport climbing at youth level. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012792

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12

How to Cite

Dong, H., & Lu, L. (2026). The Impact of Nonlinear Learning on Cognitive Load in Student Rock Climbers: A Comparison of Theoretical and Practical Tasks. ASEAN Journal of Education, 12(1). retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJE/article/view/275678