Phonics Instruction for Thai EFL Learners: A Review of Pedagogical Challenges and Local Adaptations
Keywords:
Phonics teaching, English learners in Thailand, Phonics methods, Phonics challengesAbstract
This study explored the domain of phonics instruction for English learners in Thailand, critically examining the methodologies employed, the challenges encountered, and the opportunities for bolstering literacy outcomes. Globally recognized for its effectiveness in nurturing early reading skills, phonics instruction emphasizes a systematic approach to elucidating the relationships between sounds and their corresponding letters or letter combinations. The adaptation of phonics teaching strategies for English learners in Thailand, however, presents distinct challenges. These stem primarily from the considerable linguistic differences between Thai and English, including disparities in script, phonetic systems, and grammatical structures. Central to this investigation was the aim to analyze the barriers inherent in teaching English phonics in the Thai educational context. Key obstacles include the intricacies involved in navigating phonetic discrepancies between the two languages, the limited availability of resources tailored to English phonics instruction, and the widespread need for improved teacher training in effective phonics methodologies. In addition, this study sought to identify and elaborate on practical strategies to support the successful integration of phonics teaching for English learners in Thailand. By offering a comprehensive overview of the phonics teaching landscape—including its successes and setbacks—this research provides valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers. The overarching goal is to contribute to the advancement of literacy and educational quality among English learners in Thailand, thereby enriching the global discourse on English language instruction in non-native contexts.
References
Agustine, I., & Al Fatah, M. H. (2023). Spelling error analysis on writing vocabularies in dictation word by the tenth grade students of Smk Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta [Doctoral Dissertation, Uin Raden Mas Said]. Uin Raden Mas Said.
Aldhanhani, Z. R., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. (2021). Oral reading fluency: Teaching and assessment strategies.
Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090704
Andrade Villacís, I. E. (2021). Introduce phonics as a strategy of learning reading in an effective way to the second grader students at “La Salle” high school during the academic period 2020-2021 [Master's thesis, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi]. UTC Digital Repository. http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/8226
Antoniou, F. (2021). Reading comprehension. In R. T. Boon, & V. G. Spencer (Eds.), Best practices for the inclusive classroom (pp. 155–186). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003233237-7
Baker, E. B. A., & Bradley, C. (2021). Closing the gap between oral lexicons and sight vocabulary: Examining speech recognition technologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 21(3), 436–461.
Berkowitz, M. R. (2022). A comparison of guided reading and systematic phonics approaches to supplementary reading instruction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst]. ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst. https://doi.org/10.7275/28355415
Bitney, M. (2021). The impact of explicit phonics instruction and decodable text on fluency with third-grade students [Master’s research paper, University of Wisconsin–River Falls]. MINDS@UW. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/82440
Boldrini, G., Fox, A. C., & Savage, R. S. (2023). Flexible phonics: A complementary ‘next generation’approach for teaching early reading. Literacy, 57(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12245
Bowers, J. S. (2020). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09515-y
Boyer, F., Shinohara, Y., Ishii, T., Inaguma, H., & Watanabe, S. (2021). A study of transducer based end-to-end ASR with ESPnet: Architecture, auxiliary loss and decoding strategies. In 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU) (pp. 16–23). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU51503.2021.9688251
Bredtmann, J., Otten, S., & Vonnahme, C. (2021). Linguistic diversity in the classroom, student achievement, and social integration. Education Economics, 29(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2020.1866499
Brittain, H., Wright, M., Flores, M. M., Dunn, C., Shippen, M. M., & Darch, C. (2022). teaching letter sound correspondence to preschool students with developmental and intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 57(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416472205700207
Brooks, G. (2022). Current debates over the teaching of phonics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1543
Campbell, S. (2021). What’s happening to shared picture book reading in an era of phonics first? The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2004
Ceyhan, S., & Yıldız, M. (2021). The effect of interactive reading aloud on student reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading fluency. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.201
Chen, M. J., Yin, G. J., Goh, H. S., Soo, R. S., Raja Nor Safinas R. H., Swaran Singh, C. K., & Wong, W. L. (2022). Theoretical review of phonics instruction among EFL beginner-level readers in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 449–466.
Claravall, E. B. (2021). Engaging students’ learning and thinking through reading. In A. Garcia-Nevarez, & K. A. Gordon Biddle (Eds.), Developmentally appropriate curriculum and instruction: Pedagogy for knowledge, attitudes, and values (pp. 58–78). Routledge.
Darasawang, P., & Singhasiri, W. (2022). Needs analysis of primary school English teachers: Implications for teacher training in Thailand. In S. Zein, & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English for Young Learners in Asia (pp. 65–84). Routledge.
Davey, H. M. C. (2023). A collaborative approach to enhance the teaching of English phonemic awareness in the Foundation Phase [Doctoral dissertation, North-West University].
Dilgard, C., Hodges, T. S., & Coleman, J. (2022). Phonics instruction in early literacy: Examining professional learning, instructional resources, and intervention intensity. Reading Psychology, 43(8), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126045
Ehri, L. C. (2022). What teachers need to know and do to teach letter–sounds, phonemic awareness, word reading, and phonics. The Reading Teacher, 76(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2095
El Gazi, S., & Ibrahimi, A. (2024). Personalized learning: Theory, practices, and perspectives. In M. Khaldi (Ed.), Fostering pedagogical innovation through effective instructional design (pp. 308–328). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/personalized-learning/336825
Ferrie, B., & Sheppard, S. (2023). Reading and spelling. In L. Lovell (Ed.), Teaching dyslexic students: Theory and practice (pp. 59–88). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Fletcher, J. M., Savage, R., & Vaughn, S. (2021). A commentary on Bowers (2020) and the role of phonics instruction in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1249–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09580-8
Gallagher-Mance, J. (2023). Examining early word recognition instruction: Synthetic phonics vs. analytic phonics [Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University]. https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/7144/
Hanna, C. H. F. (2023). Phonic faces as a method for improving decoding for children with persistent decoding deficits [Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College]. Louisiana State University Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_theses.5725
Hayes-Harb, R., & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 54(3), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000658
Javed, S., Muniandy, M., Lee, C. K., & Husni, H. (2023). Enhancing teaching and learning for pupils with dyslexia: A comprehensive review of technological and non-technological interventions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9607–9643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12195-5
Jiang, Y., Gai, X., Han, X., & Cui, Y. (2023). English phonics instruction for native Chinese speakers: limiting factors and tailoring strategies. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2253214
Kalaivanan, K. (2023). Lexical tone perception and learning in older adults: A review and future directions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(10), 2023–2039. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231211722
Karima, D., & Soundous, B. (2022). The usefulness of dictation strategy in fostering word recognition for reading purposes [Doctoral dissertation, Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University]. Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University Repository. https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/32764
Kumar, D. (2023). Development of English-speaking skill based on phonic of secondary school students in Kusol Suksa School Bangkok, Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Religions and Cultures, 7(1), 175–183.
Kusumaningsih, A., Putro, S. S., Andriana, C., & Angkoso, C. V. (2021). User experience measurement on augmented reality mobile application for learning to read using a phonics-based approach. In 2021 IEEE 7th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITIS53497.2021.9791660
Lamek, J. D. (2023). Teachers’ experiences in using phonics methods in teaching English reading to junior primary phase in Ohangwena region [Doctoral dissertation, University of Namibia]. University of Namibia Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11070/3745
Langille, J., & Green, Z. (2021). The impact of multi-sensory phonics programs in teaching English as an additional language. Canadian Journal of Education, 44(4), 1024–1050. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.v44i4.4723
Levin, L., Porath, S., Anderson, K., & Mackenzie, S. (2023). Phonics–making the letter sound connection. In L. Levin, S. Porath, K. Anderson, & S. Mackenzie (Eds.), Teaching literacy in grades pre-K to 2 (2nd ed.). New Prairie Press. https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/teachingliteracydraft/
Lindsey, J. (2021). Realigning early reading instruction with research: A preliminary evaluation of two research-based early reading programs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan). University of Michigan Library: Deep Blue Documents. https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/3058
Littlemore, J. (2023). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching (2nd ed.). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39796-7.
Maglione, R. (2023). The use of multisensory activities with kindergarten students to improve decoding and encoding of CVC words [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Caldwell University.
Manoharan, A., Jose, J., & Saji, S. (2022). Teaching alphabet recognition and letter sound correspondence using a 4 blocks of literacy model for children with complex communication needs (CCN): Illustrated with a single case study. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 12(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20220114
Montfort, P. M. (2023). Perceptions of preservice and mentor teachers of gaining pedagogical content knowledge in phonics and phonemic awareness [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/13059/
Moore, B. (2021). Sounds of emergence: The pedagogy of language and literacy concepts and strategies in an early learning program [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University]. ScholarWorks@GSU. https://doi.org/10.57709/22723795
Mori, Y., Hasegawa, A., & Mori, J. (2021). The trends and developments of L2 Japanese research in the 2010s. Language Teaching, 54(1), 90–127 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000336
Mounib, S., & Belmahdi, O. (2022). Investigating teachers’ use of phonics on EFL pupils’ word recognition: The case of first year middle school pupils in Ouargla [Master’s thesis, Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University]. Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University Repository. https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/31972
Murphy Odo, D. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of phonological awareness and/or phonics instruction on word and pseudo word reading of English as an L2. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211059168
Noor, V. H., Khairudin, R., Sulaiman, W. S. W., & Ng, L. O. (2022). The effectiveness of fluency building technique in teaching phonic and vocabulary to improve reading outcome in slow learner children. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 36(2), 53–65.
Oduro, P., Mensah, F. A., Quansah, F., Lawer, R. A., & Ankoma-Sey, V. R. (2021). Understanding primary school teachers’ remediation strategies in assisting pupils with reading (phonic) difficulties. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(4), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v8i4p189
Ok, M. W., Haggerty, N., & Whaley, A. (2021). Effects of video modeling using an augmented reality iPad application on phonics performance of students who struggle with reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1723152
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (2021). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognition. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Components of effective reading intervention: A special issue of Scientific Studies of Reading (pp. 235–253). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315046365-4
Oplas, M. G., Laxa, N. K. V., Sarvida, J. A. M., Sevilleno, A. F., Reyes, M. A., Veranga, R. M., Tinapay, A. O., Tirol, S. L., & Samillano, J. H. (2023). Enhancing the reading fluency of grade 2 learners through oral blending. International Journal of Multidiciplinary Research and Publications, 6(3), 72–77.
Paige, D. D., Smith, G. S., & Rupley, W. H. (2023). A study of phonemic awareness, letter sound knowledge, and word reading in struggling adolescent students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 62(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2138648
Pairor, S., & Phusawisot, P. (2022). The use of phonological awareness instruction in improving English word reading ability of Thai primary students [Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University].
Pallathadka, H., Xie, S., Alikulov, S., Sadruldeen Al-Qubbanchi, H., Hamoud Alshahrani, S., Yunting, Z., & Kargar Behbahani, H. (2022). Word recognition and fluency activities’ effects on reading comprehension: An Iranian EFL learners’ experience. Education Research International, 2022, Article 4870251. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4870251
Panjaitan, I. F. (2023). Identifying problems encountered by Thai students in reading classes of English as a Foreign Language. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 9(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v9i2.9161
Park, H. (2020). Exploring learning progress and challenges in English decoding skills development in the Korean EYL context: from the perspectives of the children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Warwick.
Perrodin, D. D. (2021). Thai undergraduate student awareness of regular and irregular grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v4i1.9839
Pham, H. C. (2021). English language education in rural areas: Current issues, complexities and ways forward. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4538
Rehfeld, D. M., Kirkpatrick, M., O'Guinn, N., & Renbarger, R. (2022). A meta-analysis of phonemic awareness instruction provided to children suspected of having a reading disability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(4), 1177–1201. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00160
Rice, M., Erbeli, F., Thompson, C. G., Sallese, M. R., & Fogarty, M. (2022). Phonemic awareness: A meta‐analysis for planning effective instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(4), 1259–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.473
Ross, K. M., & Joseph, L. M. (2021). Effects of a word boxes electronic app on improving letter-sound correspondences of learners of English as an additional language. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(3), 268–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1848953
Rubin, S. C., & Sanford, C. (2021). Pathways to personalization: A framework for school change. Harvard Education Press.
Salarvand, L., Guimaraes, N., & Balagholi, Z. (2022). Instructional strategies' impacts on EFL learners reading fluency: A review. THAITESOL Journal, 35(1), 77–90.
Sargiani, R. D. A., Ehri, L. C., & Maluf, M. R. (2022). Teaching beginners to decode consonant–vowel syllables using grapheme–phoneme subunits facilitates reading and spelling as compared with teaching whole‐syllable decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.432
Savage, R. (2022). Teaching children to read. In M. J. Snowling, C. Hulme, & K. Nation (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (2nd ed., pp. 209–233). Wiley-Blackwell.
Sirichote, P., & Kanokpermpoon, M. (2022). Investigation into Thai EFL learners’ English pronunciation using Microsoft Reading Progress [Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University].
Srimanothip, R., & González, O. (2021). The effect of computer-assisted phonics games on Thai Kindergarten students’ listening proficiency and English phonics achievement. AU Hybrid International Conference 2024 on " Entrepreneurship & Sustainability in the Digital Era" Under the Theme of "People Centric Knowledge in Intelligence World", 2(1), 339–346.
Suminto, E., & Bram, B. (2021). Phonics instruction and perceptions of teachers in Ave Maria Amnatcharoen School in Thailand. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2021.12.1.1-14
Suntornsawet, J. (2022). A systemic review of Thai-accented English phonology. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 63(1), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.63.1.13
Trivedi, V. (2022). Development and implementation of a programme for enhancing reading skills in English language of senior kindergarten students [Doctoral dissertation, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda].
Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2021). Introducing phonics to learners who struggle: content and embedded cognitive elements. Reading and Writing, 34(8), 2059–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10134-9
van den Boer, M., & de Bree, E. H. (2024). To show or tell: Improving the spelling of rule-based words with explicit or implicit practice. Scientific Studies of Reading, 28(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2283636
Webber, C., Patel, H., Cunningham, A., Fox, A., Vousden, J., Castles, A., & Shapiro, L. (2024). An experimental comparison of additional training in phoneme awareness, letter‐sound knowledge and decoding for struggling beginner readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12641
Winskel, H. (2023). Spelling and writing development in Thai. In Y. Ye, T. Inoue, U. Maurer, & C. McBride (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual-motor skills, handwriting, and spelling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 307–318). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003284048
Woore, R. (2021). Teaching phonics in a second language. In E. Macaro & R. Woore (Eds.), Debates in second language education (pp. 222–246). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008361-15
Yusoh, N., Sudinpreeda, H., & Watcharajinda, A. (2022). Applying phonics instructional method for students’ improvement of English pronunciation. In Proceedings of the 13th Hatyai National and International Conference (pp. 53–64). Hatyai University.
Zsargo, L. (2021). Learning to read in the era of systematic synthetic phonics as prime: young children’s views on their experiences [Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield]. University of Huddersfield Repository. https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/35776/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suan Dusit University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1 All articles will undergo a formal peer-review. A panel of experts from within or without the university will examine the article; approval from a minimum of two experts is required for publication. Revisions posed by the experts must be completed by the research prior to publication.
2 Once published in the ASEAN Journal of Education, the article becomes intellectual property of Suan Dusit University. Duplication, in full or part, requires permission from Suan Dusit University.
3 Excluding errors incurred during printing, author(s) are responsible for the content of their articles.



