Encouraging Transformative Learning for Community-based Product Enhancement toward International Food Standards under the Safe Food City Policy

Chanasuek Nichanong; Yuttaya Yuyen; Jiraporn Rodpuang; Suchada Koomsalud; Varaporn  Vittayaporn; Napaporn  Chiawheng; Phanarat  Phromma; Jitwimon Klaysubun

Authors

Chanasuek Nichanong Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Yuttaya Yuyen Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10700 Thailand
Jiraporn Rodpuang Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Suchada Koomsalud Faculty of Management Science, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Varaporn Vittayaporn School of Culinary Arts, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Napaporn Chiawheng Research and Development Institute, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Phanarat Phromma Research and Development Institute, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Jitwimon Klaysubun Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand

Keywords:

Transformative learning, Development goals, Safe Food City, Community-based university

Abstract

Global consumer trends increasingly emphasize food safety and sustainable agricultural production standards, prompting Thailand to accelerate the development of its agricultural sector—particularly in regions with strong potential and distinctive identity. Suphan Buri Province exemplifies such a region, with robust agricultural foundations and readiness to strengthen collaborative networks that elevate products to international standards.
This study aimed to develop a Quadruple Helix collaboration framework involving communities, government agencies, private enterprises, and higher education institutions. The objective was to foster sustainable community learning, enhance production and processing systems in alignment with food safety policies, and upgrade community food products to meet international standards for modern trade channels.
The research employed purposive sampling of nine agricultural groups, communities, and enterprises in Suphan Buri; 400 consumers who purchased safe agricultural products through modern trade channels in the province; and 50 government officials from relevant agencies. Data were collected through surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
Findings revealed that the Quadruple Helix collaboration fostered supportive systems for food safety standards and marketing, enabling community products to comply with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) requirements. The upgraded products gained access to modern trade channels, increased their value, and generated economic opportunities for local communities. Furthermore, the continuous community learning process played a vital role in raising awareness, facilitating knowledge exchange, and strengthening cross-sector collaboration, thereby advancing Suphan Buri toward becoming an effective and sustainable Safe Food City.

References

Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.

Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00273

Brookfield, S. D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 125–148). Jossey-Bass.

Brookfield, S. D. (2005). The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Open University Press.

Cranton, P. (2016). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide to theory and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448433

Cranton, P., & Taylor, E. W. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–20). Jossey-Bass.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). Food safety and quality. https://www.fao.org/food-safety/en/

Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 7–28.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Hall, B. L., Tandon, R., & Tremblay, C. (2017). Strengthening community–university research partnerships: Global perspectives. University of Victoria and PRIA.

Hart, A., Maddison, E., & Wolff, D. (2007). Community–university partnerships in practice. National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Books.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816951

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). Jossey-Bass.

Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. New England Resource Center for Higher Education.

Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427

Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475

Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. (2013). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.

Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-594-9

Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Open University of the Netherlands.

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming—A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023