The Relationship between Serious Leisure and Growth Mindset of Working People in Bangkok
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The field of human resource development (HRD) has been focusing on work-based development. However, life-based development could benefit the results of HRD too. Leisure is one of social science that can provide opportunities to promote and collaborate with HRD in expanding the capabilities of HRD disciplines in both research and practice. This research aims to study the relationship between mechanisms and results of serious leisure, which is a type of leisure that could lead to personal and group development, with development of a growth mindset of for working-age people in Bangkok. Data collection was done through online platform, yielding 414 responses. The results showed that (1) the mechanisms of serious leisure related to development of growth mindset at 0.495, and (2) result of serious leisure related to development of growth mindset at 0.535 at significant level at 0.01. As this research uses quantitative method, future research could consider qualitative research in this area to explore further about serious leisure and HRD. This research can lead to the development and design of HRD mechanisms, policies, or systems to allow HRD to broaden its horizon.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1) The content of article in HROD journal is the author’s wholly responsibility to research, analyze, summarize, compile, and reference data. The editorial department will not be responsible in anyway.
2) The submitted articles in HROD journal must be unpublished before and must not be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. If it is detected for its repetition, the author must be responsible for infringement of copyright.
3) Authors will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher. The article is prohibited to reproduce all or part of the text, unless allowed.
References
กองธรรมศาสตร์และการเมือง สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา. (2558). พจนานุกรมศัพท์ศึกษาศาสตร์ร่วมสมัย. สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา.
ดาวิษา ศรีธัญรัตน์. (2562). นันทนจิตกับการพัฒนาทรัพยากรมนุษย์. ใน รายงานสืบเนื่องการประชุมวิชาการระดับชาติเนื่องในโอกาสครบรอบปีที่ 53 แห่งการสถาปนาสถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์: เปลี่ยนโฉมประเทศไทยให้ก้าวไกลอย่างมั่นคง, (น. 271-299). กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์.
ชัชวาลย์ ศิลปกิจ, อรวรรณ ศิลปกิจ, และ รสสุคนธ์ ชมชื่น. (2558). ความตรงของแบบวัดชุดความคิด. วารสารสุขภาพจิตแห่งประเทศไทย, 23(3), 166-174.
บุญศรี พรหมมาพันธุ์. (2561). เทคนิคการแปลผลการวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลสำหรับการใช้สหสัมพันธ์และการถดถอยในการวิจัย. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์หาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, 11(1), 32-45.
ประพัฒน์ ลักษณะพิสุทธิ์. (2558). นันทนจิต (Leisure): แนวคิดที่ควรทำความเข้าใจให้ถ่องแท้. อ้างอิงจาก http://www.chulapedia.chula.ac.th/images/6/6a/นันทนจิต _(LEISURE)_แนวคิดที่ควรทำความเข้าใจให้ถ่องแท้.pdf
Bartlett, K. R. (2018, June). Work and leisure: A critical integrative literature review to explore the impacts of a false dichotomy on HRD research and practice. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice across Europe. Newcastle, UK: Newcastle Business School.
Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Brajša-Žganec, A., Merkaš, M., & Šverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81-91.
Bower, M., & Konwerski, P. (2017). A mindset for career curiosity: Emerging leaders working in the digital space. New Direction for Student Leadership, 2017(153), 89-101.
Brightbill, C. (1960). The challenge of leisure. Prentice-Hall.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. Harpar and Row.
Curtis, J.E. (1979). Recreation: Theory and practice. Mosby.
Daft, R. L. (2008). The leadership experience (4th ed.). Thomson South-Western.
Dardis, R., Soberon-Ferrer, H., & Patro, D. (1994). Analysis of leisure expenditures in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1994.11969964
Dattilo, J. (2018). Inclusion and education: Creating a path through leisure. In M. J. Monteagudo (Ed.). Leisure experiences, opportunities and contributions to human development (pp. 111-128). DuestoDigital.
Dattilo, A., Ewart, A., & Dattilo, J. (2012). Learning as leisure: Motivation and outcome in adult free time learning. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 30(1), 1-18.
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfill your potential. Ballantine Books.
Faulkner, J., & Latham, G. (2016). Adventurous living lives: Teacher qualities for 21st century Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 4(4), 137-150.
Garavan, T. M. (1997). Training, development, education and learning: different or the same? Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(2), 39-50.
Gunn, L., & Caissie, L. T. (2006). Serial murder as an act of deviant leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 30(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2006.9651340
Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (2005). Leisure and active lifestyles: Research reflections. Leisure Sciences, 27(5), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1080 /01490400500225559
Heo, J., Lee, I. H., Kim, J., & Stebbins, R. A. (2012). Understanding the relationships among central characteristics of serious leisure: An empirical study of older adults in competitive sports, Journal of Leisure Research, 44(4), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2012.11950273
Holder, M. D., Coleman, B., & Sehn, Z. (2009). The contribution of active and passive leisure to children's well-being. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308101676
Isopahkala-Bouret, U. (2008). Developmental leisure: Why work-related learning takes place outside of working hours. Human Resource Development International, 11(5), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860802417619
Jackson, E. L. (1999). Leisure and the internet. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 70(9), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1080 /07303084 .1999.10605963
Kelly, J. R. (1990). Leisure. (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kelly, M, C., Stauss, K,. Arnold, J,. & Stride, C. (2019). The relationship between leisure activities and psychological resources that support a sustainable career: The role of leisure seriousness and work-leisure similarity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103340
Kim, J., Heo, J., Lee, I.H., & Kim., J. (2015). Predicting personal growth and happiness by using serious leisure model. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0680-0
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org /10.1177/001316447003000308
Lee, Y. G., & Bhargava, V. (2004). Leisure time: Do married and single individuals spend it differently? Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 32(3), 254–274. https://doi.org /10.1177/1077727X03261631
McGuire, D. (2010). Foundations of human resource development. Retrieve http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/36589_01_McGuire_CH_01.pdf
McLean, G. N. (1998). HRD: A three-legged stool, an octopus, or a centipede? Human Resource Development International, 1(4), 375-377.
McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. D. (2001). If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context? Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 313-326.
Morris, M. L., & Madsen, S. R. (2007). Advancing work—life integration in individuals, organizations, and communities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307305486
Nadler, C. & Nadler, Z. (1992), Every manager’s guide to human resource development. Jossey-Bass.
Nawrin, R. & Mongkolsirikiet, K. (2012). Post-positivism and its implication on human resource and organization development. Human Resources and Organization Development Journal, 4(1), 10-34.
Neufeld, V. (1998). Webster’s new world dictionary, third college edition. Book Prentice Hall.
Pieper, J. (1963). Leisure: The basis of culture. Random House.
Rojek, C. (2005). Leisure theory: Principles and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sirgy, M.J., Efraty, D., Siegel, P., & Lee, D. J. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55, 241–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010986923468
Sritanyarat, D., Kanjanajuta, C. & Tanawattanakorn, C. (2010). Positivism: To see, to hear, to smell, to touch, but not to feel. Human Resource and Organization Development Journal, 2(2), 31-50.
Sritanyarat, D., Tehmarn, A., Thongteera, W., & Marin, T. (2019). Serious leisure as HRD intervention. In S. Nachmias (Ed.). Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice across Europe. (pp. 28-42). Nottingham Trent University.
Stebbins, R. (2009), Serious leisure and work. Sociology Compass, 3(5), 764-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00233.x
Stodolska, M., Berdychevsky, L., & Shinew, K. J. (2017). Gangs and deviant leisure. Leisure Sciences, 41(4), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400 .2017.1329040
Swanson, R. A. (1995). Performance is the key. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(2), 207-213.
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48 (6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2