Problems of explaining between structure and agency factors: Debates and approaches to explain phenomena in political science
Keywords:
Philosophy of social science, Agency and Structure, Political science Approach, Level of explanationAbstract
Social science phenomena are problematically explained through structural or agency factors perceived as methodological trouble. To resolve this, many thinkers presented dualism explanation as a resolution. However, each concept contains different methods as well as gaps in the explanation of social phenomena. Therefore, to be able to make use of structure and agency concepts to apply to political phenomena, the researcher should be aware of the ontological and epistemological compatibility of the theory or approach. Also, the substances and gaps of each concept should be considered in explaining the relationship and dynamic between structure and agency. Further, consistency of the concept and the political phenomenon is also key in applying each structure and agency concept.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. (Nice, R. Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Furlong, P. & March, D. (2018). “A Skin not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science” In Theory and Methods in Political Science. (4th ed, 184-211). London: Palgrave.
Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis. New York: Palgrave.
Limmanee, A. (1999). kān ʻathibāi kap kān wikhro̜ thāngkān mư̄ang : khō̜ phičhāranā bư̄angton nai chœ̄ng pratyā sangkhommasāt Phim khrang thi 1. [Political Explanation and Analyzation: Initial considerations in Social Science Philosophy 1st edition] Bangkok: Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
Limmanee, A. (2005 a). “pratyā læ withīkān sawǣng hākhwām rū thāng ratthasāt. [Philosophy and Knowledge Acquisition in Political Science]” In lak læ withī wikhro̜ thāngkān mư̄ang samai mai. [Modern political analysis] Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat University.
Limmanee, A. (2005 b). “kānsưksā ratthasāt nǣothāng rabop. [System Approach in Political Science Study]” In lak læ withī wikhro̜ thāngkān mư̄ang samai mai. [Modern political analysis] Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat University.
Limmanee, A. (2018). kān ʻathibāi kap kān wikhro̜ thāngkān mư̄ang : nǣokhit læ khō̜ tōyǣng thāng pratyā sangkhommasāt Phim khrang thi 2. [Political Explanation and Analyzation: Approach and Argument in Social Science Philosophy 2st edition] Bangkok: Sayam Publishing.
Mcanulla, S. (2002). “Structure and agency” In Theory and methods in political science. (2nd ed., 271-291). Houndmills: Palgrave.
Prasongbandit, S. (2010). nǣo khwāmkhit hā bi that khō̜ng pi ʻǣ būdi yœ̄ kap thritsadī thāng mānutsayawitthayā. [Pierre Bourdieu’s Habitas Concept and Anthropology Theories] Bangkok: Sirindhorn Anthropology Center.
Puanghut, C. (2003). Agency – Structure/ phū kratham kān - khrōngsāng : phatthanākān khō̜ng krō̜p khwāmkhit læ kānnam pai chai wikhro̜ sangkhom. [Agency – Structure: Evolution of framework and how to use for social analyzation] Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
Royal Institute. (2005). photčhanānukrom sap pratyā ʻAngkrit Thai chabap rāt bandit yō̜ sathān. [English - Thai Dictionary of Philosophy] Bangkok: Royal Institute.
Sargent, L. T. (1987). Contemporary political ideologies: a comparative analysis. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
Tangsupvattana, A. (2011). .“Agency and Social structure.” In kham læ khwāmkhit nai ratthasāt rūamsamai lem 1 Phim khrang thi 3. [Concepts in contemporary political science Book 1 3rd Edition] Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Yanyongkasemsuk, R. (2012). “manō that hā bitu bō̜kān kǣ panhā thawi niyom khrōngsāng læ tūa sadǣng. [Concept of Habitus and Solution to the Structure-Agency Dualism]” Journal of politics, administration and law, 4(3): 379-409.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Political Science Critique
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.
All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.
