A Study of the Relationship between Political Parties and People during Election Season A Case Study of Pheu Thai Party

Main Article Content

Pakawadee Suphunchitwana

บทคัดย่อ

The research question of this research is how people and Pheu Thai political party interact in the policy development process. Answering this question to clarify the relationship above can be divided into four sub-points, which are 1) who are the people in the perception of the Pheu Thai Party? 2) Does Pheu Thai Party’s regulatory structure and mechanism allow people to be involved? 3) What are the practices and activities of the Party and the member involving the people? And 4) What is the level of people’s participation in the Pheu Thai’s policy development process? To be able to answer all questions, the researcher has looked at the activities that The Party claim “people” as centrepiece in the policy-making process based on the election process on March 24, 2019. To demonstrate the empirical data, the researcher attempted to collect all sources, as follows 1) Pheu Thai Party’s documents, arty regulations, ideology, policy, meeting minutes, etc. 2) The academic’s analysis and ideas from all media. 3) Monitoring of Pheu Thai Party member’s field visits and 4) Interview with eight Pheu Thai political executive members.


The results of the study revealed that the people from the viewpoint of Pheu Thai Party’s consisted of all civilians and residents of Thailand.  The relationship between Pheu Thai Party and the people in policy development process depends on radical change of the political conditions after the coup on May 22, 2014 that limit the interactions between the party, the political member and the people. The relationship between Pheu Thai party and the people currently rests on an important condition: the old successful image of policy’s administrative of group of executive member who are the same groups since the Thai Rak Thai Party.


The Pheu Thai Party’s policy-building mechanism in the 2019 elections, under the legal conditions and relations with the people mentioned above, is characterized by an attempt to open various channels for public hearing. A draft and the improving of a draft of policy were created by specific working group. In the improving process, the working group has been negotiating the direction of the policy between the stakeholder, the people and the executive of the arty. However, the final policy decision-making for electoral campaigns still depends on the executive group within the party.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Buchori, Y. (2003). nayōbāi hāsīang nǣo prachā niyom kap ʻamnāt thāng sētthakit : kānsưksā chœ̄ng sētthakit kānmư̄ang kīeokap khwāmsamret nai kān lư̄aktang khō̜ng phak Thai rak Thai. [Populist campaign policy and economic power: a political-economic study of the electoral success of the Thai Rak Thai party] (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Political Science, Department of Government.

Floridia, A. (2013). Participatory Democracy versus Deliberative Democracy: Elements for a Possible Theoretical Genealogy, Two Histories, Some Intersection. 7th ECPR General Conference Sciences Po. Bordeaux. Section Four Decades of Democratic Innovation Research: Revisiting Theories, Concepts and Methods. Panel 147 Historicising Deliberative Democracy.

Foowongchareon, P. (2015). “saphāwa sēnthāng bang khap ( Path dependence ) : ratthasāt bon sēnthāng prawattisāt. [Path dependence: political science on the path of history]” Political Science Journal, 36(3): 92-127.

HedstrÖm, J. & Smith, J. (2013). Overcoming Political Exclusion: Strategies for marginalized groups to successfully engage in political decision-making. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. StrÖmsborg Sweden.

iLaw. (2018, March 27). 18 khō̜tō̜ ʻong hām thā fāfư̄n hai ʻongkō̜n ʻitsara yup phakkānmư̄angsippǣt khō̜tō̜ ʻong hām thā fāfư̄n hai ʻongkō̜n ʻitsara yup phakkānmư̄ang. [ 18 Prohibitions If violated, independent organizations are required to dissolve political parties] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/4767.

iLaw. (2018, November 9). lư̄aktang 62 phak kān mư̄ang tō̜ ʻong čhœ̄ panhā ʻarai bā ngok ʻon kān lư̄aktang. [Election 62 What problems do political parties have to face before the election?] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/5008.

iLaw. (2018, October 19). khotcha . chai māttrā sīsipsī hā mahā sīang ʻō̜ nalai yoklœ̄k phrai mā rī wōt. [NCPO uses Section 44 to ban online campaigns and abolished the primary vote] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/4978.

iLaw. (2019, April 3). lư̄aktang hoksipsō̜ng sūt kham nawa na sō̜ . sō̜ . pā tī lit mai yāk khit ʻēng dai mai tō̜ ʻong rō̜ kok tō̜. [62 elections, formulas for calculating MPs, party lists are not difficult, you can think for yourself, you don't have to wait for the ECT] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/5240.

iLaw. (2019, February 16). lư̄aktang 62 khum khē makānchai čhāi phakkānmư̄ang chai ngœ̄n dai nō̜i long kot rabīap yumyim yong tit khuk. [Election 2019, tight control of spending less money by political parties, violating of regulations resulted in risk of going to jail] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/5165.

iLaw. (2020, March 8). lư̄aktang 5 khrang 4 rabop prīapthīap rabop lư̄aktang 2540 thưng patčhuban. [Election 5 times, 4 systems, comparing the electoral system from 1997 to present] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From https://www.ilaw.or.th/node/5240.

Kersbergen, Kee van. (2008). The Disenchantment Politics. Kulturelle Grundlagen von Integration. Universität Konstanz.

Klaukka, G., Van Sam der Staak and Valladares, J. (2017). The changing nature of political parties and representation. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Trydells Tryckeri, Stromsborg, Sweden.

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling The Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso.

Muksong, C. (n.d.) prachā niyom. [Populism] Retrieved 8 April 2020 From www.kpi.ac.th.

National Democratic Institute. (2011). Political Parties, Public Policy and Participatory Democracy: How Internal and External Consultation Helps European Political Parties To Develop Responsive Public Policy. National Endowment for Democracy. Washington DC.

National Democratic Institute. (2013). Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Developing Party Policies. National Endowment for Democracy. Washington DC.

Office of the Election Commission of Thailand. (2007). samnao prakāt nāithabīan phakkānmư̄ang rư̄ang rap čhot čhǣ ngō̜kāntang phak phư̄a Thai . nangsư̄ thī lot . ( thop phō̜ . ) 0401/12611 long wan thī 21 Kanyāyon 2550. [A copy of the political party registrar's announcement Regarding notification of the establishment of the Pheu Thai Party. Letter No. Lortor. (TorBorPor.) 0401/12611, dated 21 September 2007]

Pheu Thai Party. (2007). khō̜bangkhap phak phư̄a Thai Phō̜.Sō̜. 2550. [Pheu Thai Party 2007 Regulation] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2008). khō̜bangkhap phak phư̄a Thai Phō̜.Sō̜. 2551. [Pheu Thai Party 2008 Regulation] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2009). bǣp rāingān kāndamnœ̄n kitčhakān khō̜ng phakkānmư̄ang phak phư̄a Thai rō̜p pī Phō̜.Sō̜. 2551 thī phot . 0326 / 2552 long wan thī 27 Mīnākhom 2552. [Pheu Thai Party 2008 Business Operation report no.0326/2552 dated 27 March 2009] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2010). bǣp rāingān kāndamnœ̄n kitčhakān khō̜ng phakkānmư̄ang phak phư̄a Thai rō̜p pī Phō̜.Sō̜. 2552 thī phot . 0063 / 2553 long wan thī 31 Mīnākhom 2553. [Pheu Thai Party 2009 Business Operation report no.0063/2553 dated 31 March 2010] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2011). bǣp rāingān kāndamnœ̄n kitčhakān khō̜ng phakkānmư̄ang phak phư̄a Thai rō̜p pī Phō̜.Sō̜. 2553 thī phot . 0078 / 2554 long wan thī 28 Mīnākhom 2554. [Pheu Thai Party 2010 Business Operation report no.0078/2554 dated 28 March 2011] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2012). bǣp rāingān kāndamnœ̄n kitčhakān khō̜ng phakkānmư̄ang phak phư̄a Thai rō̜p pī Phō̜.Sō̜. 2554 thī phot . 0050 / 2555 long wan thī 30 Mīnākhom 2555. [Pheu Thai Party 2011 Business Operation report no.0050/2555 dated 30 March 2012] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2013). bǣp rāingān kāndamnœ̄n kitčhakān khō̜ng phakkānmư̄ang phak phư̄a Thai rō̜p pī Phō̜.Sō̜. 2555 thī phot . 0278 / 2556 long wan thī 28 Mīnākhom 2556. [Pheu Thai Party 2012 Business Operation report no.0278/2556 dated 28 March 2013] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2018). khō̜bangkhap phak phư̄a Thai Phō̜.Sō̜. 2561. [Pheu Thai Party 2018 Regulation] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2018). nayōbāi phak phư̄a Thai Phō̜.Sō̜. 2561. [Pheu Thai Party 2018 Policy] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2019). rāingān kānprachum khana kammakān bō̜rihān phak khrang thī 6 / 2562 wan thī 16 Singhākhom 2562 Na thīthamkān phak phư̄a Thai ʻākhān ʻō ʻē ʻai thāo wō̜. [Minutes of Pheu Thai Party Executive Committee Meeting No. 6/2019 on August 16, 2019 at the Pheu Thai Party Office OAI Tower] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2020). rāingān kānprachum khana kammakān bō̜rihān Phō̜.Sō̜. 2562-2563. [Minutes of Pheu Thai Party Board of Directors years 2019-2020] (Unpublished manuscript).

Pheu Thai Party. (2020). rāingān kānprachum samāchik saphā phūthǣn rātsadō̜n yǣk rāi phāk Phō̜.Sō̜.2562-2563. [Minutes of the meeting of members of the House of Representatives by region years 2019-2020] (Unpublished manuscript).

Saenphumi, S. (2014). kānčhat ʻongkō̜n phak phāitai kānnam khō̜ng thaksin chin wat : kō̜ranī sưksā phak Thai rak Thai phak phalang prachāchon læ phak phư̄a Thai. [Party Organization Under the Leadership of Thaksin Shinawatra: A Study of the Thai Rak Thai, Palang Prachachon and Pheu Thai Parties] (Master's Thesis). Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Political Science, Department of Government.

Sawasdee, S. N. (2006). Thai Political Parties in the Age of Reform. Institute of Public Policy Studies, Bangkok.

Suphanjitwana, P. (2002). kānphatthanā rūpbǣp kānmī sūanrūam khō̜ng prachāchon nai kānbō̜rihān kānphatthanā ngān sāthāranasuk mūnlathān dōi chai theknik dē lō̜ fāi. [The development of a model of public participation in primary health care development management using the Delphi technique] (Master’s Thesis). Khon Kaen University, Graduation School.

Suwanmanee, C. (2018). kān lư̄aktang khrang rǣk tām ratthammanūn hǣng rātchaʻānāčhak Thai Phutthasakkarāt 2560. [First election According to the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560] National Assembly Library of Thailand.

Tansoon, S. (2007). khwāmsamret thāngkān mư̄ang læ khwāmpen sathāban kānmư̄ang khō̜ng phak Thai rak Thai. [Political Success and Political Institution of the Thai Rak Thai Party] (Term Paper). Thammasat University, Faculty of Political Science.

Tejapira, K. (2019, June 16-22). prachāthipatai mai thammai sērī prachāthipatai čhưng kœ̄t wikrit? [New democracy: Why is liberal democracy in crisis?] Retrieved 8 April 2020 From www.matichonweekly.com.

Thairath. (2019, February 26). nirathōtsakam sut sō̜i hāyana phư̄a Thai lung kamnan nom ʻop lukhư̄ khap lai ying lak. [Absolute Amnesty is a disaster for "Pheu Thai" uncle kamnan spin mob uprising to evict Yingluck] Retrieved 13 April 2020 From www.thairath.co.th.

Treesuwan, H. (2017, December 16). ratthammanūn sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihoksip : nak ratthasāt wičhān kamčhat Thana thō̜n - sakat kǣ ra thana . tham mūanchon long thanon. [The 2017 Constitution: Political Scientists criticized of eliminating Thanathorn -–nterception of the constitution reform, causing masses to enter the streets] Retrieved 3 May 2020 From www.bbc.com.