Cāṇakya’s Political Strategies as Depicted in the Sanskrit Drama Titled Mudrārākṣasa

Authors

  • chayanut chindarak Pd.D Candidate, in Sanskrit Department of Oriental Languages, Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University, Bangkok 10200, Thailand. Email: chayanut_jin@hotmail.com
  • Chainarong Klinnoi Associate Professor Dr., Sanskrit Department of Oriental Languages, Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University, Bangkok 10200, Thailand. Email: klinnoi_c@su.ac.th
  • Nipat Yamdate Lecturer, Dr., Sanskrit Department of Oriental Languages, Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University, Bangkok 10200, Thailand. (Co-Advisor) Email: yamdate_n@su.ac.th

Keywords:

Strategy, Political Affairs, Political Thought, Cānakya, Mudrārākṣasa

Abstract

This article aims to present Cānakya's political strategy model in the Sanskrit drama Mudrārākṣasa, by analogy with Kauṭilīya's Arthaśāstra. The study found that Cānakya adopted the interstate relations management model of Arthaśāstra that uses six guṇa in combination with four upāya, with trivarga, for war or armistice, to shape the political strategy in the drama. There is a process to start from. (1) Formulate a policy directed at six guṇa, namely sandhi (peace), that "will bring amātya Rākṣasa to be the Prime Minister of Lord Chandragupta " to uphold the sovereignty of Lord Chandragupta. (2) Formulate a plan for implementing the policy directly with six guṇa, namely, vigraha (provocation) that "must create a rift between amātya Rākṣasa and his allies." (3) Define practices: (3.1) The operator is a spy, (3.2) the method is a ploy within the concept of four upāya: sāma (bonding), dāna (reward), bheda (provocation), daṇḍa (punishment) has methods: killing, intelligence, forging, and deceit (3.3) tools, namely, 3 objects: rings, stamps, forged letters, and jewelry, all processes use the 7 state elemental conditions of one's own and the enemy's parties, assessing them when they have an advantage: (1) kṣaya, weak condition, (2) sthāna, equal condition, (3) vṛddhi, strong condition.

References

Bhishagratna, K. K. (1911). An English Translation of The Sushruta Vol.2. Calcutta: The Bharat Mihir Press.

Ghosh, M. (Trans.). (1951). The Nātyaśāstra Ascribed to Bharata-Muni (Vol.1). Calcutta: The Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.

Kale, M. R. (Trans.). (1976). Viśākhadatta: Mudrārākṣasa With the Commentary of Ḍhuṇḍhirāja. (6th ed.) Delhi: Motilal anarsidass.

Kangle, R.P. (Trans.). (2010). The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra. Dehi: Motial Banarsidass.

Kidchai, P. (2018). kānprīapthīap nūai rātchakān lap khē čhībī ( KGB ) khō̜ng sahaphāp sō wī yot læ nūai rātchakān lap sī ʻai ʻē ( CIA ) khō̜ng saha rat ʻō̜ mē ri kā kō̜ranī sưksā ʻitthiphon botbāt læ nāthī dān khwāmmankhong khō̜ng prathēt nai chūang songkhrāmyen ( khō̜ . sō̜ . nưngphankāorō̜isīsiphā - nưngphankāorō̜ikāosipʻet). [The Comparison Between Secret Intelligence Agencies of Soviet Union (KGB) and United States of America (CIA) in Case Study of Influence, Roles and Duties of National Security During The Cold War Period (1945 – 1991)] (Bachelor’s research paper) Thammasat University, Faculty of Liberal Arts.

La-oungsri, K. et al. (2016). ʻIndīa mahatsačhan. [The wonder that was India] Bangkok: Toyota Thailand Foundation.

Majumder, Shilpi Dutta. (2010). Concept of Espionage in Kauṭiliya Arthaśāstra: Its Relevance to Present Era. (Doctor of Philosophy’s thesis) Assam University, Department of Sanskrit, School of Languages.

Mitra, Bhaswati. (1989). Place of Mudrārākṣasa as a Political Drama in Ancient Indian Literature. (Doctor of Philosophy’s thesis). Jadavpur University, Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts.

Narain, V. (Ed.). (2005). Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra. Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratiṣthan.

Rangarajan, L.N. (Ed.). (1992). Kauṭilīya The Arthashastra. Calcutta: Penguin Books India.

Sastri, Gaurinath. (1960). A Concise History of Classical Sanskrit Literature. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.

Wantana, S. (2018). lōk thī khit wā khunkhœ̄i ? khwāmkhit thāngkān mư̄ang Thai samai krung sī yut yā. [familiar world? Thai political thought during the Ayutthaya period] Bangkok: Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kasetsart University.

Williams, M. M. (1986). A Sanskrit – English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31 — Updated on 2023-12-31

How to Cite

chindarak, chayanut, Klinnoi, C., & Yamdate, N. (2023). Cāṇakya’s Political Strategies as Depicted in the Sanskrit Drama Titled Mudrārākṣasa. Political Science Critique, 10(20), 171–198. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PSC/article/view/263109

Issue

Section

Academic Article