Survey the State of Knowledge in the teaching of Thai Public Administration.
Keywords:
public administration, cognitive status, road challenges in the 21st centuryAbstract
The research titled “Survey the State of Knowledge in the teaching of Thai Public Administration” has the following objectives: 1. To explore the current state of Thai public administration knowledge 2. To study the challenges in the 21st century that affect the public administration’s knowledge of how to implement. The research is qualitative research using a documentary analysis method, a documentary research method that is related to teaching and learning in public administration that the teaching and learning structure is organized in the faculties, departments, or courses, including a study of academic work and research in public administration in Thailand by scholars of various groups by analyzing the content. The results of the research found that: 1. The body of knowledge in Thai public administration the body of knowledge is integrated with other sciences to explain the phenomenon of public administration in an interdisciplinary manner. There is a study aimed at the study of management by the change in the context of development and the creation of participation from all sectors in the administration of the public, private and civil society sectors. 2. Challenges in the 21st century that affect the body of public administration. It was found that the public administration believes that research is a tool for seeking knowledge or a guideline. Solve effective problems in government administration. It is research of the environment and human behavior. Therefore, research is required as a systematic process of seeking knowledge from clear problems. The hypothesis was tested to show the relationship between cause and effect.
References
Allio, L. (2014). Design Thinking for Public Service Excellence. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/capacitybuilding/global-centre-for-public-service-excellence/DesignThinking.html
Berman, E. (2010). Public Administration in Southeast Asia: An Overview. In Berman, E. M. (Ed.), Public Administration in Southeast Asia: Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Macao (pp. 1-25). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Bowonwattana, P. (2010). Public organization theory. (12th printing). Bangkok: Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
Bowonwattana, P. (1984). Worldviews of Thai academics in public administration. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Bunyaratphan, T. (2013). Principles of good governance of good governance, 10 elements. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.drmanage.com
Charnnarong, C. (2020). “A Guideline to Study Development of Public Administration.” Political Science and Public Administration, 11(1): 115-140.
Cheung, A. B. L. (2011). NPM in Asian Countries. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management (pp. 131-144). Burlington: Ashgate.
Chiangchana, N. (2007). Research Synthesis in Music Education: Meta-analysis and Content Analysis. (Master's Thesis) Chulalongkorn University.
Dokthaisong, B. (2019). Disruptive public administration. Ayutthaya: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.
Glass, G. V. (1976). “Primary secondary and meta–analysis of research.” Educational Researcher, 5(10): 3-5.
Henry, N. (1975a). Public Administration, and Public Affairs. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Henry, N. (1975b). “Paradigms of Public Administration.” Public Administration, 35(4): 378-386.
Henry, N. (2009). Public Administration and Public Affairs. (11th edition) Pearson Education, Inc.
Kenaphoom, S. (2014). “Format for writing a research concept framework. Management: A format for writing a research concept on management.” Journal of Maha Sarakham Rajabhat University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 8(3): 33-42.
Kenaphoom, S. (2015). “Evolution and Scope of Public Administration.” Chophayom Journal, 26(2): 267–294.
Kenaphoom, S. (2016). “Conceptual framework for studying public policy.” Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University Social Science Academic and Research Journal, 11(33): 1-16.
Kerlinger, (1973). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. (2nd edition) Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
Luangprapat, W. (2020). Governance based on cooperation: The state of a decentralized society Fragmentation in the public administration system and seeking new models for driving the state's mission. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok's Institute.
Mongkolpitaksuk, U. (2012). “Public Administration: Government Administration in the 21st Century Public Governance.” Rompruek Journal Krirk University, 30 (3): 176-180.
Noranitipadungkarn, C. (2016). “Public Administration in Thailand: Its Birth Expansion and Thoughts on the Future.” Journal of Public Administration and Politics, 5(1): 198 - 210.
Noranitiphadungkarn, C. (2018) “Public administration in Thailand: theory and practice.” Journal of Public Administration and Politics, 7(2): 197-203.
Nyhan, R. C. (2007). “Changing the Paradigm: Trust and its Role in Public Sector Organization.” The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1): 87-109.
O'Flynn, J. (2007). “From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigm Change and Managerial Implications.” Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66 (3): 353-366.
Okoth, S. (2015). A Review of State of the Art of Public Administration in Western Academic: Lesson for the Gulf States. Middle East Review of Public Administration, 1(1): 1-20.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction: The (New) Public Governance: A Suitable Case for Treatment? In Osborne, S. P. (Ed.) The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.
Photisawang, P. (2011). “Scope and characteristics of public administration knowledge in brief.” political journal Administration and Law, 3(1): 115-142.
Phromrin, N. (2009). The Evolution of Thai Public Administration Paradigms 1955-2008. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Phuphapawat, P. et al. (2020). Guidelines for participation in activities that promote democracy among students of Surin Rajabhat University. Journal of Human Social Studies, 18(3): 102-103.
Phusee-an, S. (2005). “Meta-analysis: Principles and Practices.” Journal of Educational Measurement, 1(1): 86-98.
Ponkaew, N. (2011). Synthesis of Research on Conflict Management in the Education System during 1999-2011. (Master's Thesis) Naresuan University.
Poolsuwan, S. (2011). Meta-analysis: Knowledge Creation from Research. Bangkok: Office of the National Research Council of Thailand.
Poomipratate, P. (2020). “Participatory Guidelines on Activities Promoting Democracy Practices of Surindra Rajabhat University Students” Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (JHUSOC), 18(3): 101–129.
Ratanaset, W. (2014). Public Administration of Citizens. King Prajadhipok's Institute: Nonthaburi.
See-dam, I. (2021). “Public administration in a network format and its use in Thailand.” Journal of Administrative and Management Innovation, 9(3): 95 -106.
Srirongthong, P. (2020). “A variety of New Public Management concepts and the Future of Public Management.” Journal of Chandrakasemsarn, 26(1): 31-44.
Suphachakwathana, W & Puttaraksa, W. (2018). On theories political science and public administration. (2nd Edition) Phitsanulok: Naresuan University Press.
Tantrajin, P. et. al. (2016). “Human Capital: Human Resource Development in the 21st Century.” Suthiparitas Journal, 30(special issue): 119.
Thaweepon, Y. et al. (2017). “Development of the science of public administration during the period of administration separating from politics towards a new style of governance: strategic analysis.” Journal of Politics and Governance, 7(3): 211-231.
Wichianpanya, P. (2004). Knowledge Management: Fundamentals and Applications. Bangkok : Thammamon Printing.
Wirachchai, N. (2002). “Linking the body of knowledge from research through meta-analysis.” Journal of Research Methodology, 15(3): 296-322.
Wirachchai, N. (2008). Synthesis of research on the quality of Thai education: a meta-analysis. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Wiratchai, N. (1999). Meta-analysis. Bangkok: Nichin Advertising.
Wiratniphawan, W. (2004). Public administration concepts in the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (1997) and important constitutions. Bangkok: Rule of law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Political Science Critique
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents and information in the manuscripts published by Journal of Political Science Critique are the authors’ opinions; thus, the authors take sole responsibility for any contents. The editorial board does not agree with or accept responsibility for the manuscripts.
All published articles, information, contents, pictures, or other things in Journal of Political Science Critique are Copyright by the Journal. All Rights Reserved. All contents may not be copied or duplicated in whole or part by any means without the prior written permission of Journal of Political Science Critique.
