Strategies and Self-Regulation in French Language Learning among Thai Learners at the Tertiary Level

Authors

  • Dr. Sunporn Eiammongkhonsakun Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Srinakarinwirot University

Keywords:

self-regulation, French language learning, learning objectives

Abstract

The selection of suitable strategies and self-regulation methods in learning contributes to increased opportunities for learners to achieve success and/or higher motivation in learning. This is because learners are able to engage attentively in their studies and various activities until their objectives are accomplished. The study aims to examine self-regulation strategies in the French language learning process among Thai tertiary-level students and propose effective learning methods and guidance for anticipated success. The researcher conducted interviews with 30 Thai learners studying French language at the tertiary level in Bangkok. The interview questions employed are open-ended inquiries centered around three academic situations: regular classroom learning, exam preparation, and group work. The findings revealed that different learning situations influenced the selection of strategies and self-regulation methods. Specifically, learners emphasized self-directed learning in all activities, but in regular classroom learning, learners prioritized learning objectives. On the other hand, during exam preparation, learners focused on content review with peers, and in group work, social dynamics were identified as a highly influential factor. Additionally, the observed self-regulation processes in all activities included maintaining focus on goals. Furthermore, learners exhibited individual differences in the selection of self-regulation methods based on their own characteristics.

References

Anderson R.D., 2002. “Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 13 (1): 1-12.

Andrade M.S. & Bunker E.L., 2009. “A model for self‐regulated distance language learning.” Distance Education 30 (1): 47-61.

Bandura A., 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Broadbent J. & Poon W.L., 2015. “Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review.” The Internet and Higher Education 27: 1-13.

Butler D.L. & Winne P.H., 1995. “Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245-281.

Dabbagh N. & Kitsantas A., 2005. “Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning.” Instructional Science 33: 513–540.

Davis E.A., 2003. “Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (1): 91-142.

Duncan T.G. & McKeachie W.J., 2005. “The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 117-128.

Garrison R.D., 2003. “Self-directed learning and distance education.” In M.G. Moore & W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hanno E. & Surrain S., 2019. “The direct and indirect relations between self-regulation and language development among monolinguals and dual language learners.” Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 22 (1): 75-89.

Hoch E., Scheiter K., & Schüler A., 2019. “Implementation intentions for improving self-regulation in multimedia learning: Why don’t they work?” The Journal of Experimental Education 88 (4): 536-558.

Hromalik C.D. & Koszalka T.A., 2018. “Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes.” Distance Education 39 (4): 528-547.

Naseri S. & Motallebzadeh K., 2016. “Podcasts: A factor to improve Iranian EFL learner’ self-regulation ability and use of technology.” Educational Technology & Society 19 (2): 328-339.

Nastasi B.K. & Schensul S.L., 2005. “Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research.” Journal of School Psychology 43 (3): 177-195.

Pintrich P.R., 2000. “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning.” In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.

Saks K. & Leijen Äli., 2014. “Model for supporting cognitive and metacognitive strategies in technology enhanced language learning.” In Y.-T. Wu, T. Supnithi, T. Kojiri, C.-C. Liu, H. Ogata, S.C. Kong et al. (Eds.), Workshop Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2014 (pp. 630-639). Japan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, 30 November–4 December 2014.

Schraw G., Crippen K.J., & Hartley K., 2006. “Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning.” Research in Science Education 36 (1-2): 111-139.

Schunk D.H. & Zimmerman B.J. (Eds.), 1994. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Severini E., Kožuchová M., Kuruc M., & Kostrub D., 2022. Self-regulation of learning in the natural science of future teachers. Proceedings Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 10: 289-293.

Zimmerman B.J., 2000. “Attaining self-regulated learning: A social cognitive perspective.” In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26