#ThaiNiRakSaNgopButToRopMaiKhlat (Thailand Values Peace but Will Not Falter in War) : A Phenomenological Study of Hashtag Use in Social Media — The Case of Thailand and Cambodia

Authors

  • Benjarong Tirapalika Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thaksin University

Keywords:

Phenomenology, Hashtag Activism, Social Media, Digital Identity, Discourse

Abstract

This study aims to explore the phenomenon of the hashtag #ThaiNiRakSaNgopButToRopMaiKhlat in the context of the Thailand-Cambodia border clash in May 2025. Employing the framework of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and hermeneutic phenomenology, the research investigates how social media users experience, interpret, and emotionally engage with the hashtag as both a discursive and affective tool. The findings reveal that the hashtag serves not only as a mechanism of state communication during moments of national crisis but also as a contested ideological space. While the Thai Army initially promoted the hashtag to foster unity and national sentiment, it was later appropriated by some users to question military legitimacy and oppose potential coupsillustrating the phenomeno of semantic shift and the existence of multiple realities, as proposed by Alfred Schutz. Furthermore, the hashtag played a key role in creating an affective atmosphere of engagement, enabling users to construct shared experiences through posts, memes, and protestrelated content. These actions demonstrate that digital hashtags are not merely symbolic but are embedded in embodied social practices that bridge online and offline realities. Ultimately, this research underscores the dynamic power of hashtags as socio-political tools in the digital era, facilitating identity formation, emotional expression, and ideological negotiation within networked publics.

References

Castells, M. (2004). The network society A cross-cultural perspective: Edward Elgar.

Couldry N (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge: Polity.

Couldry N, Hepp A (2017). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Context, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3):191-202.

Cull, N. J. (2010). Public diplomacy: Seven lessons for its future from its past. Place branding and public diplomacy, 6(1), 11-17.

Delanty, G. (2003). Citizenship as a learning process: Disciplinary citizenship versus cultural citizenship. Int. of Lifelong Education, 22(6), 597-605.

Dijk van Jan, A. (2006). The network society. Social aspects of new media. In: London- Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Emma, O. U. (2015). The hashtag as a channel of international communication: a study of the# BringBackOurGirls hashtag. Communication Panorama African and Global Perspectives, 1(1), 1 - 13.

Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks,105-117.

Gukelberger, S., & Meyer, C. (2021, September). Creating space by spreading atmospheres: Protest movements from a phenomenological perspective. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol 22, No. 3).

Harris, B. (2013). Diplomacy 2.0: The future of social media in nation branding. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 4(1), 3.

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge.

Hocking, B., & Melissen, J. (2015). Diplomacy in the digital age. The Hague: Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

Izotova, N., Polishchuk, M., & Taranik-Tkachuk, K. (2021). Discourse analysis and digital technologies: (TikTok, hashtags, Instagram, YouTube): universal and specific aspects in international practice. Amazonia Investiga, 10(44), 198-206.

Kampf, R., Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). Digital diplomacy 2.0? A cross-national comparison of public engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(4), 331-362.

Kieowsa-ard, S. (2013). The Making of the Thai National Anthem. National Defence Studies Institute Joumal, 4(2), 42-45. [in Thai]

La Rocca, G. (2020). Possible selves of a hashtag: Moving from the theory of speech acts to cultural objects to interpret hashtags. International Joumnal of Sociology and Anthropology, 12(1), 1-9.

Leight, N., Walton, S. B., Ananian, T., Cruz-Enriquez, M., & Jarwaharlal, K. (2011). PDiN Quarterly-Trends in Public Diplomacy: January, February and March 2011. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7, 136-149.

Manor, I. (2016). Are we there yet: Have MFAs realized the potential of digital diplomacy ?: Results from a cross-national comparison. Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 1(2), 1-110.

Metzl, J. F. (2001). Network diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of Intemational Affairs, 77-87.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Schutz, A. (1970). Alfred Schutz on phenomenology and social relations (Vol. 360). University of Chicago Press.

Tettegah SY (2016). (Ed.). Emotions, Technology, and Social Media. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Tirapalika, B. (2022). The S-CP2D model: The process of building the intimate relationship among MSM-Men who have an intimate relationship or sexual intercourse with men-within Twitter. Kasetsart Joumnal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 547-552.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-21

Issue

Section

Research articles