The Opinion of Graduate Diploma Program Students in Curriculum and Instruction, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University on Using Social Media for Teaching Supervision
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is survey research with the objective of examining and comparing the opinions of students of the Graduate Certificate program, Major in Curriculum and Instruction, at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University regarding the use of social media in instructional management. The study categorizes the opinions according to gender, age, and experience. The sample group consists of 123 students enrolled in the course of teacher vocational experience training in the academic year 2021, obtained by simple random sampling. The number of samples was determined using Krejcie & Morgan table. The research instrument was a questionnaire on the using social media for teaching supervision. Data were analyzed by percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA.
The results showed that 1) the sample group generally holds a high level of opinion regarding the use of social media for teaching supervision. When considering each aspect in order of average scores, it showed that the benefits from social media supervision were the highest average score, followed by consulting and communication, and coaching on professional training and supervision, all three aspects had a high level. 2) The students with different genders, ages and experiences had similar opinions regarding the use of social media for teaching supervision.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อความ ภาพประกอบ ตารางประกอบ ที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเป็นความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนแต่เพียงผู้เดียว ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราชแต่อย่างใด
บทความที่เสนอพิจารณาในวารสาร e-JODIL ต้องเป็นบทความที่ไม่เคยส่งไปลงพิมพ์ เผยแพร่ หรืออยู่ระหว่างการพิจารณาของวารสารอื่น
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการพิจารณาและตัดสินการตีพิมพ์บทความในวารสาร
References
Ajinsamajarn, C. (2004). Educational Supervision. Bangkok: K&P BOOKS Publisher.
Damjub, W. (2019). Social Media for Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century. Journal of Liberal Arts, Maejo University, 7(2), 143-159.
Dong, G., Chiu, D.K.W., Huang, P.-S., Ho, K.K.W., Lung, M.M.-w., & Geng, Y. (2021) Relationships between Research Supervisors and Students from Coursework-Based Master’s Degrees: Information Usage under Social Media. Information Discovery and Delivery, 49(4), 319-327
Harris, B.M. (1985). Supervision Behavior in Education (2nd ed). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Laohacharatsaeng, T. (2007). Next-Generation Learning 1: Section Essential Characteristics of the Tweenies Learners. Chiang Mai: Information Technology Service, Chiang Mai University.
School of Educational Studies. (2020). Graduate Diploma Program in Curriculum and Instruction. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University.
Vaiz, O., Minalay, H, Türe, A., Ülgener, P., Yaşar, H., & Bilir, A.M. (2021). The Supervision in Distance Education: E-Supervision. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 11(3), 137-140.
