Influencers and Fake News Management in Thai Online Social Media
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the dual roles of influencers in managing fake news on Thai social media, encompassing both their role as sources and disseminators of misinformation, and as mechanisms for countering it. The research employed a case study analysis of two initiatives: the “TikTok Anti-Fake News” campaign by Thailand’s Anti-Fake News Center and the “Mor Lam Cofact” project by ESAN Cofact.
The findings reveal that influencers contribute to the dissemination of fake news through four main mechanisms: intentional creation, unintentional sharing, misuse of influence, and echo chamber effects, as well as the use of deepfake technology. At the same time, influencers can counter fake news through proactive surveillance, fact-checking, and promotion of media literacy. A comparison of the two case studies demonstrates clear differences in target audiences, credibility-building mechanisms, and communication strategies. The TikTok initiative focuses on speed and broad reach, whereas Mor Lam Cofact emphasizes depth and long-term sustainability.
This study proposes a new conceptual framework, the “Culturally-Adaptive Multi-Step Flow of Information,” which expands upon the traditional two-step flow theory to explain the complexity of digital-era communication where information flows occur in multiple directions, across platforms, and in reversible patterns, while also being shaped by cultural contexts. The findings underscore that leveraging influencers to combat fake news requires not only adapting strategies to suit different online platforms but also aligning communication approaches with the specific cultural and contextual characteristics of each target audience.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อความ ภาพประกอบ ตารางประกอบ ที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเป็นความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนแต่เพียงผู้เดียว ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราชแต่อย่างใด
บทความที่เสนอพิจารณาในวารสาร e-JODIL ต้องเป็นบทความที่ไม่เคยส่งไปลงพิมพ์ เผยแพร่ หรืออยู่ระหว่างการพิจารณาของวารสารอื่น
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการพิจารณาและตัดสินการตีพิมพ์บทความในวารสาร
References
Anti-Fake News Center Thailand. (2023). TikTok Short Clips “Ru Than Khao Plom” (Be Aware of Fake News from Influencers) by Anti-Fake News Center Thailand. Retrieved August 2023, from https://shorturl.at/Es73K
Bodaghi, A., & Oliveira, J. (2022). The Theater of Fake News Spreading, Who Plays Which Role? A Study On Real Graphs of Spreading on Twitter. Expert Systems with Applications, 189, 116110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116110
Esan Cofact. (n.d.). Home [Facebook page]. Retrieved August 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/p/อีสานโคแฟค-ESAN-Cofact-100064054450605/
Gbaje, E., Agwu, C., Yani, S., & Odigie, I. (2023). Curtailing Fake News Creation and Dissemination in Nigeria: Twitter Social Network and Sentiment Analysis Approaches. Journal of Information Science, 51(4), 987-999. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160029
Hirunburana, V., & Euajarusphan, A. (2020). Communication Strategies and Effect of Social Media Influencers’ Health Ideas. Inthaninthaksin Journal, 15(2), 93–107. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSOTSU/article/view/246602
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). People’s Choice: How The Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Man OneMan. (2021). Molam Cofact: Stop Fake News, reclaim the truth [Online video]. YouTube. Retrieved August 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKtmeSmfAQ8
Murphy‑Reuter, B. (2025, January 16). Social Media Is the New Public Health Frontline. Let’s Treat It That Way. Harvard Public Health Magazine. Retrieved June 26, 2025 https://harvardpublichealth.org/tech-innovation/to-combat-misinformation-social-influencers-need-the-right-tools/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Pérez-Escoda, A., Pedrero-Esteban, L. M., Rubio-Romero, J., & Jiménez-Narros, C. (2021). Fake News Reaching Young People on Social Networks: Distrust Challenging Media Literacy. Publications, 9(2), 24.
Plewsrikaew, R., Uttaman, A., & Phaithayawat, Y. (2022). The Development of Characteristics of Being Social Media Influencers for High School Students. Udon Thani Rajabhat University Academic Journal, 10(2), 1–16. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/UDRUAJ/article/view/257593
Plumewong, N., & Charoenporn, C. (2023). The Participation of Fake News Within Community Organizations: A Case Study of Fake News Monitoring in New Normal World. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 7(1), 248–259. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14456/jeir.2023.17
Roonkaseam, N. (2024). Combating Fake News: From SHARE to Media Literacy Strategies in The Digital Era. Bangkok: O.S. Printing House.
Saber, A. A., Easa, H. K., Ismael, A. R., Saber, H. A., & Omer, A. K. (2023). Detecting Fake News Spreaders on Twitter. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(3), 1648-1654. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i3.pp1648-1654
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The Spread of Low-Credibility Content by Social Bots. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7
Suriwan, K., Puangsuwan, P., & Chulimasat, U. (2016). The Relationship between Opinion Leaders, Consumers, And Brand. NIDA Journal of Communication and Management, 2(3), 79–96.
Warutsardsadanun, S., Kaisomsart, P., Songdach, P., & Chaleeraktrakoon, T. (2022). The Influence of Social Endorsement on Message Credibility of Health-Related Fake News on Facebook in Undergraduate Students. Journal of Communication Arts Review, 26(3), 67–78. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jca/article/view/259143/174229