The Relationship among Profitability,Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand
Keywords:
Profitability of Corporate, Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of ThailandAbstract
This study aimed to examine The Relationship among Profitability, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility of Companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Data were gathered from the total of 2,308 datasets of annual reports and form 56-1, which were prepared by 483 companies at the end of accounting period during B.E. 2557-B.E.2561 as presented in the SET website. In this study, in order to examine the relationship between Profitability of Corporate, Levels of Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility of companies listed on SET, the following variables were selectively determined : Profitability of Corporate (ROA) was the independent variable; The Corporate Social Responsibility performance (CSR) was the dependent variable; and the Levels of Corporate Governance (CG) was the moderating variable.
In order to describe the preliminary statistics of the total 2,308 datasets as the research samples, the descriptive statistics was applied. The findings presented that 4% of the return on assets companies listed on the SET; 14.7% of these companies were ranked in the excellent, 29.6% were ranked in very good, and 26.9% were ranked in good levels of corporate governance; and these companies averagely earned the corporate social responsibility score at 0.56 out of 1. According to the multiple regression analysis on the relationship among profitability of corporate and the moderating effect, the results were presented as follows. 1) Profitability of Corporate positively relation to the corporate social responsibility. 2) There was a positive relationship between levels of corporate governance and the corporate social responsibility at statistical significance. 3) Levels of Corporate Governance negatively relation to the relationships between profitability of corporate and the corporate social responsibility.
References
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information cost, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
Anand, S. (2008). Essentials of corporate governance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). ‘Organizationalslack and the composition of corporate communityinvolvement.’ Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Denver.
Chaimala K., & Tanupol, I. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm’s Performance. Interdisciplinary Sripatum Chonburi Journal, 3(2), 1-9.
Clarke, T.(Ed.). (2004). Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. New York: Routledge.
Garcia L., Gago R., & Nieto, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 10(1), 1-20.
Hensawang S. (2017). The effect of corporate governance score and shareholder structure on excess returns and financial performance: An empirical study in the stock exchange of Thailand. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, 3(2), 35-51.
Iturriaga, J., & Foronda, O. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and large shareholders: An analysis of European Firms. University of Burgos, Spain.
Janshom S. (2010). The relationship between organization size and level of corporate social responsibility disclosure of industrial companies listed on the stock exchange of Thailand. Thesis. Thammasat University.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firms: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Majeed, S., Tariq, A., & Saleem, S. (2015). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure : An empirical evidence from listed companies at KSE Pakistan. International Journal of Financial Studies. 3(4), 530-556.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
Thai Institute of Directors. (2017). CGR reports. Retrieved on 4 January 2020 from http://www.thai-iod.com/th/publications.asp?type=4
Thaipat Institute. (2007). Corporate social responsibility guidelines. Retrieved on 18 August 2020 from http:// www.setsustainability.com/download/ejlrcm56ns3fi7v
The Stock Exchange of Thailand . (2012). The guidance of corporate social responsibility. Retrieved on 2 April 2020 from https://www.set.or.th/sustainable_dev/th/cg/files/2013/CGPrinciple2012Thai-Eng.pdf
The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2015). Concept of financial planning. Retrieved on 4 January 2020 from https://www.set.or.th/set/financialplanning/knowledgedetail.do?contentId=526
The Securities and Exchange Commission. (2017). The guidance of corporate social responsibility. Retrieved on 23 March 2020 from http://www.set.or.th/sustainable_dev/th/sr/publication/files/corporate_ social_responsibility.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economics and Business Administration Journal Thaksin University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.